Aller au contenu

Photo

Loghain > Allister


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
307 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Serogon

Serogon
  • Members
  • 819 messages

KalosCast wrote...

Serogon wrote...

It's possible I'm remembering wrong, but weren't the only Orlesians that were coming Grey Wardens? That's hardly handing Ferelden over to them.


The Orlesian Grey Wardens supported by 2 companies of Chevalier Cavalry (I think they said it was cavalry, might be wrong on that. But I think it is because it's only the second time they mention horses outside of an origin story)


The Halla keeper in the Dalish camp mentions them after the origin story, but that might have been what you were reffering to.

#52
KalosCast

KalosCast
  • Members
  • 1 704 messages

Serogon wrote...

The Halla keeper in the Dalish camp mentions them after the origin story, but that might have been what you were reffering to.


That would be the first time it gets mentioned.

#53
jeckaldied

jeckaldied
  • Members
  • 278 messages
I got the feeling from what we see of Cailan that the average meeting with his advisers went something like this:



Cailan walked into the meeting room, Anora and the advisers had clearly been talking for some time, so deep in their conversation about the current state of affairs they didn't even notice he entered. Sitting at his seat, he glanced at the group of them before finally speaking up. "So...what are we talking about today"



Anora and the Advisers exchanged awkward glances, one of them mouthing to Anora "How did he know we were meeting today?" Anora turns to Cailan, thinking quickly, she smiles and suggest "Why don't you go practice a mock battle with the guards in the court yard, half of you be Grey Wardens, the other half darkspawn."



"Ooooh, good plan, can't have them getting rusty!" Cailan exclaims, jumping from his seat with enthusiastic excitement. Anora and the Advisers sigh with relief, and then get on with ruling the country.



Multiple points in the game pretty much state that Anora was the true leader of Fereldan, even while Cailan was alive.

#54
KalosCast

KalosCast
  • Members
  • 1 704 messages
I have a feeling that Cailan filled the exact same role that Alistair does if you set up Anora-Alistair as the rulers. He's the adorable public face and inspirational leader she does the thinky bits.

#55
koshiee

koshiee
  • Members
  • 312 messages
alistair is an annoying baby which is made abundantly clear at the landsmeet.

If you ignore all the bat **** craziness that Loghain did b4 the landsmeet of which he has no real good justification for then he is a much more fun character.

#56
velmyn

velmyn
  • Members
  • 68 messages
Loghain is ruthless and charismatic sure. So was Hitler.



Now, Loghain wasn't quite THAT bad, but he almost was. I'm sure he was an effective general, but effective general =/= effective politician. If he really knew what he was doing, he'd realize how easy Cailan is to manipulate if you play the 'glory with the Grey Wardens' card...and he'd be using that to further the interests of his own nation.



That's, assuming he even had the best interests for his own nation.



Instead he:



1. Deserts the battlefield.

2. Kills his own king. (No doubt he swore an oath to protect him too)

3. Who also happens to be his son in law.

4. Seizes power in his own nation. (One he claims to be protecting)

5. Sells his citizens into slavery. (Against its own laws no less)

6. Allows members of his court to be tortured.

7. Then blames someone else for it.



If his hatred is his only good reason, and he's allowing this to cloud his judgment, then he's ANYTHING BUT an effective ruler. Maybe, you could argue that Cailan and Loghain are equally incompetent...



As for having both in the same package like Apophis suggested...Eamon seems pretty decent. He's not AS nice as Allistair(he doesn't show Jowan mercy, not that it's expected since this game isn't super goody two shoes material) nor is he as persuasive or imposing as Loghain, but he's close...out of the choices we're given, I'd vote him ruler. (which he sort of becomes in spirit anyway if you let Allistair take the crown)



A few cutscenes and especially his last line(that he can rest easy knowing the Grey Warden is there to protect Ferelden) almost starts to reveal a more tragic side...but so far nothing. As many people are pointing out, the things he's done are just way too drastic. Maybe future material will allow us to view Loghain in a more sympathetic light, but nothing will really absolve him of his guilt, that much is a fact.

#57
KalosCast

KalosCast
  • Members
  • 1 704 messages

koshiee wrote...

alistair is an annoying baby which is made abundantly clear at the landsmeet.
If you ignore all the bat **** craziness that Loghain did b4 the landsmeet of which he has no real good justification for then he is a much more fun character.


Yes, when you ignore everything bad about something, it's usually pretty good.

#58
Fishy

Fishy
  • Members
  • 5 819 messages

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

Loghain > Alistair...as a tyrannical, Orlais-phobic traitor who killed his king. Yep.

Okay, admittedly I think Alistair > Loghain, BUT I did turn Loghain into a Grey Warden exactly once. After chatting with him, I can kind of respect the man that he was before he went completely bonkers over Cailan accepting help from Orlais to fight the darkspawn.


He was completly Manipulated by Howe.But the guy he's a true warrior and prob the best strategic guy on ferelden.While Allistair he's a EMO little **** that just cry 24/24 and want to save every kitten in every tree.

He pissed me off when i said to him

-Our future don't look very Nice

Than the little cry baby that cry 24/24 dare to tell me

- BLABLABLA i'm pissed at you all that matter it's the blight
-5 app

I wanted to kill him right in the bat.

He ****** me off.he do absolotly nothing but cry and dare to judge my descision?
Sten he's a true man that understand what it take to win a war.Allistair he's a children inside the body of a man.

#59
Element CL

Element CL
  • Members
  • 131 messages
I was surprised to find out loghain wasn't a demon's puppet. When it turned out he was just sort of an angry war vet type he got a little more respect. And honestly, my Allistair was as feeble in a fight as he was in taking over as King. I was happy to trade the crybaby for a decent fighter.  When Allistair wanted to storm away pouting, I knew I chose the better Man. 

Modifié par Element CL, 22 novembre 2009 - 09:52 .


#60
Fulgrim88

Fulgrim88
  • Members
  • 1 585 messages

Element CL wrote...

I was surprised to find out loghain wasn't a demon's puppet. When it turned out he was just sort of an angry war vet type he got a little more respect. And honestly, my Allistair was as feeble in a fight as he was in taking over as King. I was happy to trade the crybaby for a decent fighter.  When Allistair wanted to storm away pouting, I knew I chose the better Man. 

This (when it comes the the actual topic)

I got the opposite impression actually. That Cailan does care etc and
also its his advisors and guards who take care to stop any ugly parts
from entering his world.

But if he'd really   cared, he could easily have gone there to look for himself, instead of blindly listening to his guards. "Well, if they say so, it can't be that bad:wizard:" .....

There's no doubt that he's an overally nicer person than Loghain, but there's a hell of a doubt that he's a better ruler.

#61
Lethlar

Lethlar
  • Members
  • 7 messages
I always though the explanation of Loghain selling elves off despite his own deep beliefs against slavery and freedom for fereldans, is that when people have very strong overpowering beliefs the belief tends to become them and they can't disassociate their actions with their beliefs, assuming they always align. They'll act against their original beliefs without realizing it if it serves their own interests.

#62
Dark83

Dark83
  • Members
  • 1 532 messages

velmyn wrote...

effective general =/= effective politician

Bingo.

A good man does not necessarily make a good leader.
A good leader does not necessarily mean he is a good man.

By his actions, a man is judged.
If you act like a saint simply because you want to be regarded as a saint, then in the end you are a saint.
Inversely, if you rule as a tyrant then you are a tyrant, regardless of your desire to help your citizens.

Loghain is not a good person by any stretch of the imagination. By his own actions, he is damned.

#63
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages
O course Loghain > Alisair. In almost everyway. Heck, sometimes Loghain manages to be more funny than Alistair.

And Tyrant =/= bad or "evil".
Most of the great leaders that we today revere were tyrants. A tyrant, in literally Greek, simply means "King". It has no negative connotation.

Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 22 novembre 2009 - 12:50 .


#64
Melichai

Melichai
  • Members
  • 37 messages
I'm not too surprised by the dislike of Loghain. He is set up as the villain of the piece. However, he is not evil - he is simply committed to a goal, the independance of Ferelden and is willing to commit almost any act to advance or defend that independance.

Look at Duncan and the Grey Wardens - if Loghain is evil, are they good? Like Loghain they are commited to a goal, the defeat of the Darkspawn threat and they are willing to commit almost any act to advance that goal. They force initiates to drink tainted blood, and even if they survive the taint is death sentence. If Duncan thought Cailan was was hindering his efforts to defeat the Blight, does anyone think he would hesitate to murder him any more than he hesitated to murder Jory, whose only crime was to value a future with his wife and child more than swallowing tainted, poisonous blood? Would Duncan or any of the Grey Wardens lose any sleep about Fereldens independance if it meant defeating the blight? Duncan does not get involved with rescuing the women in the City Elf origin. He only helps the noble character if they swear to go into the Joining, a potential death sentence.He only offers to help the poisoned Dalish, again if they enter the Joining. We are not talking Awful Good Palidans here, hes got leverage over you and is happy to exploit it so he gets what he wants.

Loghains hostility to the Grey Wardens is probably rooted in that: He knows the Grey Wardens are amoral in their efforts to defeat the Blight, and he knows they place little or no value on Fereldens independance. Hence he fears and resents their influence over Cailan, who he considers naive and reckless: Cailan thinks the Grey Wardens are Awful Good Palidans. Loghain knows theyre just as amoral as he is.

For Loghain its clear hes got problems:
- Firstly he is despairing of his ability to reason with the King, who seems only concerned with building a glorious legend rather than Ferelden: I picked up that Loghain disagreed with the Kings need for an all or nothing, glorious battle with the Darkspawn, especially given the growing numbers of Darkspawn. Loghain never provides an alternative plan for the benefit of the player, but he does believe preservation of forces is the most important thing: hence Id believe he would be willing to trade land for time, and try to maneuvere so as to isolate and crush parts of the horde seperately in a series of one sided battle than to take on the entire horde in one finely balanced battle.

- Nobody considers the Darkspawn to be a true blight; several smaller battles have already been fought without any appearance of an Archdemon. Loghain can be forgiven for going with the conventional wisdom of "This is just a big raid" as opposed to believing Grey Wardens who he wholly distrusts anyway. Cailan believes the same, and Duncan is unable to convince him otherwise. Even if Duncan was to explain how he *knows* there is an Archdemon, it probably wouldnt make Duncan more reliable in Loghains view. It would only give Loghain another reason to distrust and fear the Grey Wardens and their influence over Cailan.

- Loghain sees the King inviting Orlesian forces into Ferelden, whilst planning a bloody battle with the Darkspawn. To his mind, the fresh Orlesians arrive after what at best will be a bloody and costly victory. Cailan is fighting at the frontlines and might even perish, calling the succession into question. From Loghains point of view, who is then to curb the Orlesians ambitions? With their military in the country at the very least they could throw their weight behind a pliable puppet. Loghain, already disagreeing with the "glorious final battle" strategy of Cailan decides he must preserve the bulk of Fereldens armies to secure the countries independance: he hints at this in the "regent" speech early in the cut scenes where he talks about defeating the Darkspawn sensibily so as to ensure their forces are not spent on one opponent.

- Some might confuse Loghains ultra-nationalism with a love of all Fereldens. If anything, the opposite is often the case. For Loghain, Ferelden is defined in opposition to Orlesian rule. Loghain knows that because he fought and bled as part of that opposition to Orlesian rule. That Cailan doesnt recognise this makes him a bad king. If the nobles are not willing to unify to defend Ferelden then that makes them no different to the traitors who bowed to the Orlesians during the occupation. Facing enemies within, he does what he feels he has to do to unify the state and protect its independance from enemies within and without - I dont ever get the sense he revels in cruelty, and indeed when Howe brings him word of the growing civil war his reaction is quite telling. It communicates frustration and maybe confusion at the situation slipping away from him: he probably figured that regardless of problems, the nobles and people would pull together behind him in facing the Darkspawn and the Orlesians.

Loghain isnt the typical bad guy, hes more a mirror to the Grey Wardens. They do what they have to do to defeat the Blight. He does what he has to do to defend Ferelden. Its a question of priorities and Loghain places a greater priority on defending against Orlais than he does defeating what no one is even sure is a Blight until its too late. Alisters attachment to Duncan clouds the issue for him, but if the Grey Wardens considered Loghain vital to defeating the Blight they wouldnt have any moral issues with aligning with him, even after Ostragar. As Alister mentions many, many times the Grey Wardens are willing to accept aid from any quarter to defeat the Blight. Alister has simply lost that perspective given his connection to Duncan.

I like Loghain, he reminds me of Irenicus in that he you can empathise with him: Irenicus might be a souless monster, but his soul was stolen from him. One of the best villain speeches Ive seen in a game was at the confrontation in the Elven city where the queen reminds him of their past love, and he responds with regret that joy and love was taken from him, and all he had left was his memory of that joy and love, and then only the memory of that memory, and now all he has left is his veangence before finishing "AND. I. WILL. HAVE. IT!"

Modifié par Melichai, 22 novembre 2009 - 04:46 .


#65
Akka le Vil

Akka le Vil
  • Members
  • 1 466 messages

Suprez30 wrote...

He was completly Manipulated by Howe.But the guy he's a true warrior and prob the best strategic guy on ferelden.

Killing half of your army and starting a civil war are the new benchmarks of good strategy.
No wonder it's up to the player to save the world when you see the competence of the supposed best mind of the country.

Melichai wrote...

I'm not too surprised by the dislike of Loghain. He is set up as the villain of the piece. However, he is not evil - he is simply committed to a goal, the independance of Ferelden and is willing to commit almost any act to advance or defend that independance.

So you are allowed to kill, betray, slaughter, torture, enslave and the like, as long as it goes with one of your preference, it's not evil ?
Wow, the definition of evil is becoming funnier and funnier these days.

His only flaw was his irrational phobia of Orlais.

Err... And his total, complete, utter lack of anything remotely close to empathy ?

KalosCast wrote...

The Orlesian Grey Wardens supported by
2 companies of Chevalier Cavalry (I think they said it was cavalry,
might be wrong on that. But I think it is because it's only the second
time they mention horses outside of an origin story)

Well, they don't need to say that it's cavalry, "chevalier" MEANS it's cavalry ^^

#66
Melichai

Melichai
  • Members
  • 37 messages

Akka le Vil  wrote...

So you are allowed to kill, betray, slaughter, torture, enslave and the like, as long as it goes with one of your preference, it's not evil ?
Wow, the definition of evil is becoming funnier and funnier these days.


And Duncan murders Jory - a man with a pregnant wife at home whom he clearly loves - with little thought. Wow, the definition of good is becoming funnier and funnier these days.

Modifié par Melichai, 22 novembre 2009 - 05:34 .


#67
Akka le Vil

Akka le Vil
  • Members
  • 1 466 messages

Melichai wrote...

And Duncan murders Jory - a man with a pregnant wife at home whom he clearly loves - with little thought. Wow, the definition of good is becoming funnier and funnier these days.

*reread his post*

Where did I said that Duncan was good ? 'can't find it.
And I don't really think killing Jory was justified in any way, so your strawman falls completely flat.

And by the way, even if I would say that Duncan is "good" (which isn't the case) :
- At least Duncan do it himself from the front and doesn't backstab.
- He seems to clearly dislike it, while Loghain doesn't give a s***.
- It's completely laughable to even put the crimes of Duncan and Loghain on the same level.

#68
Mystranna Kelteel

Mystranna Kelteel
  • Members
  • 9 657 messages

Apophis2412 wrote...

""I will also argue  that "from the perspective of the delusional schizophrenic", he might "have to" cut off his own
arm in order to avoid being spied on by aliens. Doesn't mean doing it is actually right or necessary.

Loghain's actions were right from his perspective. His only flaw was his irrational phobia of Orlais.
If Loghain had been tried in a modern court of law he would not been have been convicted for murder, etc, but merely considered 'not accountable for his own actions.'


I disagree again. Even Anora says she knows Loghain is responsible for his crimes. As does Cauthrien, and those two are about as loyal as they come. There is no way he wouldn't be held accountable.
He willingly and purposefully sold his citizens into slavery. He willingly and purposefully murdered, tortured, and poisoned his own citizens. He willingly and purposefully called everyone who disagreed with him at the Landsmeet a traitor.
It doesn't matter if he thinks he's right. Of course he thinks he's right in his own mind. That doesn't make him any less guilty. :?
He broke the law of his kingdom and showed absolutely no respect or concern for the same people he said he was trying to save. He was trying to force them into line against his own personal quest against Orlais. He's beyond redemption and 100% accountable for his actions.

#69
Melichai

Melichai
  • Members
  • 37 messages
Loghain is no more or less evil than Duncan. They are both men who have a goal and will do anything to accomplish it. Calling one evil, and then making excuses for the other whilst at the same time making grand statements about how funny definitions of evil are is a bit puzzling.



Alister hates Loghain because he holds Loghain responsible for Duncans death. Yet despite that, he barely passes any comment at all on Duncans murder of Jory. Would Alister consider Jorys family justified to similarly hate Duncan for what he did to their husband, brother, father, son? Duncan has his reasons for killing Jory - he felt he had to protect the Grey Wardens secret - but Loghain has his reasons for his actions too.



Dismissing Loghain as evil is a gross simplification in a world where Duncan is held up as a heroic figure to be mourned. The man is the Grey Wardens enemy, but that doesnt mean hes the bad guy. He is simply a man with a different and opposing view of the world. There is nothing Loghain did that the Grey Wardens wouldnt do if it helped them achieve their aims.

#70
Guest_Elphabas_hat_*

Guest_Elphabas_hat_*
  • Guests
It made me very sad to see Loghain sink so low. I can only attribute it to the fact that he didn't have Maric to balance him out anymore, but some of his decisions seem so out of character to me. I mean I knew he was capable of being very brutal when it came to defending Ferelden, but selling the alienage elves into slavery? Really? And his lame justification just pissed me off. I would love to blame it all on Howe's influence, but Loghain was the one who made all the final decisions in the end, and he's not some weak-willed, easily swayed, wishy-wash pansy. Gah! I get so riled when I think about it. Now that's good writing.

As far as Loghain being greater than Alistair. I'm not sure how the OP meant to justify that. Do you mean as a ruler? I don't know... I think the best combo is Alistair + Anora. Loghain is too brutal for my tastes.

Modifié par Elphabas_hat, 22 novembre 2009 - 06:34 .


#71
Melichai

Melichai
  • Members
  • 37 messages
Loghain would simply be reflecting the views of the populace at large: Elves are second class citizens at best, and in many eyes arent even that. They arent *real* Fereldans. Even Duncan doesnt consider saving the women in the Alienage origin worthwhile against his own studied "neutrality".



Also, Loghain isnt trying to save the people of Fereldan. The people of Fereldan might live very happily under Orlesian rule if they just accepted it. He is attempting to save Fereldan as an independant state. People who oppose him in this goal, even Fereldans are simply enemies or worse yet traitors and collaborators. Nationalists are quite willing and capable of killing fellow countrymen who dont live up to the standards of that nationalist.




#72
Mystranna Kelteel

Mystranna Kelteel
  • Members
  • 9 657 messages
You people who use "they're second class citizens anyway!!" as a justification for slavery are hilarious.

#73
Element CL

Element CL
  • Members
  • 131 messages
Damn knife-ears.

#74
Akka le Vil

Akka le Vil
  • Members
  • 1 466 messages

Melichai wrote...

Loghain is no more or less evil than Duncan. They are both men who have a goal and will do anything to accomplish it. Calling one evil, and then making excuses for the other whilst at the same time making grand statements about how funny definitions of evil are is a bit puzzling.

I think your grasp on morality principles and your reading comprehension are even more puzzling.

#75
MFCell

MFCell
  • Members
  • 167 messages
If you gear and spec Alistair out correctly, he is infinity better than Loghain in combat. He alone can reach 100% to Ice resistance, no other character can, unless given Templar as a specilization.

Loghain, story-wise, makes much more sense to me as an ally with armies and political pull, you should pardon him in front of the Landsmeet to prove your worth as King, and then marry Anora, taking Loghain as your step-father and right hand man to defend Ferelden in Wartimes.

Modifié par MFCell, 22 novembre 2009 - 07:08 .