Siansonea II wrote...
The Bottom Line:
If you have "questions" or "concerns" about the real-world believability about implementing same-sex romance in Mass Effect, you should remember that you're playing a VIDEO GAME with talking aliens and biotic "magic". The "realism" ship has sailed, and you weren't on it. And quit trying to make it sound like you're just concerned about realism, that your objections have nothing to do with your attitudes toward real-world homosexuality. Because that's BS. You know it, I know it. Because if "realism" was the real concern, then the backlash wouldn't be crashing on the shores of same-sex romance. It's an optional part of the game, easily avoided, with minimal impact if not pursued.
Do we really want to champion realism? Is this not a thinly veiled campaign against Teh Gay In Mah Game? How about the Lazarus Project? TOTALLY unrealistic, from start to finish, for a number of reasons. Shepard dies, is exposed to hard vacuum for an unknown period of time, suffers enough post-mortem trauma to become "meat and tubes" at the beginning of the Lazarus Project, is mandated to be brought back "exactly as he/she was" (and yet can change class) is brought back by an ENEMY, and yet still, miraculously, stupidly, IT WORKS? Really? All those delicate synapses in the brain that control memory, personality, identity, those were REPAIRED? After all that damage? Body rebuilding is easy, just clone/regenerate tissue (why the cybernetics?) Stem cell the eff out of Shepard's body, I don't care. But brain death is brain death, and no amount of story handwaving is going to excise the fly from that ointment. So why aren't the Soldiers for Realism in Mass Effect weighing in heavily and repeatedly on this issue? Why are they instead just worrying about the possible expansion of some existing characters for an additional romance OPTION? I'll tell you why: because it's not about realism at all. Don't spit in my eye and tell me it's raining, kids, and don't kid YOURSELVES. We all know what's really going on here (and in every previous incarnation of this exact argument). You don't like the gay. Well there's a solution. It's called GETTING OVER YOURSELF. Or, coming into the 21st Century. You might want to do that anyway, because clinging to 1950s mores and values is only going to get more difficult as time goes by.
Just gonna quote this because it truly is the bottom line.
Also the original analysis of this is so ridiculous, OP should read that second quote in their sig and take it to heart.
Modifié par makenzieshepard, 30 septembre 2011 - 04:22 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







