Is ME3 set in 2186?
#1
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:21
I ask because I've been writing quite a bit of the front page articles for the Cerberus Daily News fansite - indeed, for the past few months, I've written most of the articles. I'd like to see CDN continue running front page articles until Bioware's official CDN updates start again. So, I've been trying to plan ahead a bit.
As part of that effort, I've been tossing around ideas for one or two New Years themed articles in late Dec 2011, early Jan 2012. If ME3 takes place in 2186, and not 2187, though, perhaps it would be better to avoid mentioning any events like New Years, to make sure my updates don't conflict with the "canon" timeline.
#2
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:24
#3
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:26
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Actually Thane's projected death was in 2186. No one knows when that guy will die.Lucky Thirteen wrote...
I think it will be taking place in 2186, cause there is a chance Thane will be dead in 2187 and they did confirm he will be returning for ME3.
#4
Guest_SkyeHawk89_*
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:27
Guest_SkyeHawk89_*
#5
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:33
jreezy wrote...
Actually Thane's projected death was in 2186. No one knows when that guy will die.Lucky Thirteen wrote...
I think it will be taking place in 2186, cause there is a chance Thane will be dead in 2187 and they did confirm he will be returning for ME3.
Yeah, but the game can still take place before his projected death or during if Bioware wants to make me cry. Either way, at the current time of stuff goings on there is a chance he will be dead in 2187.
#6
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:38
ME2 does indeed take place in 2185, though Arrival takes place in 86. I THINK I heard that ME3 will take place about 6-12 months after Arrival, but I'm not 100% sure. If that is indeed what I heard, it means ME3 could be in either 86 or 87.
#7
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:39
Arrival's taking of place isn't as clear. I would bet on it being April or March 2186 personally.
Modifié par strive, 01 octobre 2011 - 03:41 .
#8
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:42
I thought that ME3 begins 6-12 months after the end of Arrival, not the end of ME2. If we assume Arrival takes place in March 2186, that would place ME3 anywhere between Sept 2186 and March 2187.
Of course, there's always a chance I just don't know what I'm talking about...
#9
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:44
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
#10
Guest_SkyeHawk89_*
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:47
Guest_SkyeHawk89_*
#11
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:47
jreezy wrote...
I believe ME3 takes place 6-12 months after Arrival.
Which would mean shep has been in trial for that amount of time, the conviction comic basically cannonized that shep turned him/herself in a couple days after arrival.
Modifié par MarchWaltz, 01 octobre 2011 - 03:47 .
#12
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:49
#13
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:53
#14
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:54
jreezy wrote...
I believe ME3 takes place 6-12 months after Arrival.
Casey Hudson said, "Mass Effect 3 takes place two months after the events of Arrival". Jesse Houston said "Mass Effect 3 takes place 6-12 months after Mass Effect 2". Either neither really knew at the time, or the events of Mass Effect 2(Suicide Mission, etc) happen 6-12 months before Mass Effect 3, and Arrival happens 2 months before Mass Effect 3. Between those four months Shepard is doing LotSB or something?
However this is just speculation, and it contradicts playing Arrival before the Suicide Mission.
Modifié par strive, 01 octobre 2011 - 03:55 .
#15
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:56
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Does this mean that those of us who did Arrival pre-SM have completely screwed up the timeline?DWH1982 wrote...
ME2 does indeed take place in 2185, though Arrival takes place in 86.
Modifié par Cthulhu42, 16 décembre 2011 - 07:25 .
#16
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 04:03
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
And this is why it would have been better to restrict Arrival to after the game is beaten.strive wrote...
jreezy wrote...
I believe ME3 takes place 6-12 months after Arrival.
Casey Hudson said, "Mass Effect 3 takes place two months after the events of Arrival". Jesse Houston said "Mass Effect 3 takes place 6-12 months after Mass Effect 2". Either neither really knew at the time, or the events of Mass Effect 2(Suicide Mission, etc) happen 6-12 months before Mass Effect 3, and Arrival happens 2 months before Mass Effect 3. Between those four months Shepard is doing LotSB or something?
However this is just speculation, and it contradicts playing Arrival before the Suicide Mission.
#17
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 04:04
Cthulhu42 wrote...
Does this mean that those of us who did Arrival pre-SM have completely screwed up the timeline?DWH1982 wrote...
ME2 does indeed take place in 2185, though Arrival takes place in 86.
Good question.
I have no clue. Player choice does tend to muck things up a bit.
The Mass Effect Wiki timeline does place Arrival in 86.
Modifié par DWH1982, 01 octobre 2011 - 04:04 .
#18
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 04:14
DWH1982 wrote...
Cthulhu42 wrote...
Does this mean that those of us who did Arrival pre-SM have completely screwed up the timeline?DWH1982 wrote...
ME2 does indeed take place in 2185, though Arrival takes place in 86.
Good question.
I have no clue. Player choice does tend to muck things up a bit.
The Mass Effect Wiki timeline does place Arrival in 86.
And that's why I always play LotSB and Arrival after the SM. I don't want the Time Police on my door.
#19
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 04:48
Nah, they'll probably just say that you did it post-SM (like you're supposed to), and not even acknowledge the fact that you did it before. Canon tends to work like that.DWH1982 wrote...
Cthulhu42 wrote...
Does this mean that those of us who did Arrival pre-SM have completely screwed up the timeline?DWH1982 wrote...
ME2 does indeed take place in 2185, though Arrival takes place in 86.
Good question.
I have no clue. Player choice does tend to muck things up a bit.
The Mass Effect Wiki timeline does place Arrival in 86.
Modifié par wizardryforever, 01 octobre 2011 - 04:48 .
#20
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 05:25
wizardryforever wrote...
Nah, they'll probably just say that you did it post-SM (like you're supposed to), and not even acknowledge the fact that you did it before. Canon tends to work like that.
Based on the latest comic, it's definitely after the SM: Vega hears about the destruction of Bahak only days after it happens, and Shep is already in custody. The comic also clearly takes place after Retribution, which in turn is absolutely post-SM.
#21
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 07:30
el master pr wrote...
And that's why I always play LotSB and Arrival after the SM. I don't want the Time Police on my door.[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/bandit.png[/smilie]
Definitely.
Personaly I thought it was a little unfortunate that they didn't simply restrict LoTsB and Arrival til after the main story.
But then again, options ftw.
Modifié par Nauks, 01 octobre 2011 - 07:32 .
#22
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 07:41
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
You never know. If he keeps up his rigorous exercise methods and clothing fashion he could live a full Drell life.Lucky Thirteen wrote...
jreezy wrote...
Actually Thane's projected death was in 2186. No one knows when that guy will die.Lucky Thirteen wrote...
I think it will be taking place in 2186, cause there is a chance Thane will be dead in 2187 and they did confirm he will be returning for ME3.
Yeah, but the game can still take place before his projected death or during if Bioware wants to make me cry. Either way, at the current time of stuff goings on there is a chance he will be dead in 2187.
#23
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 07:42
#24
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 07:55
JeffZero wrote...
I'm not thrilled with the idea of being able to do LotSB and especially Arrival before SM but the thing that really irks me is how Hackett's transmission is an unavoidable post-Horizon stint. While it's not too difficult to explain away Shepard's decision to put it on hold given how little information about what's really going Hackett possesses (sure it's Reaper-related but colonies are vanishing quickly) the whole notion still manages to get to me.
I don't think Bioware considered it to be important at the time. Still gets on my nerves when it seems to cause confusion among the fans (especially when it comes to silly oversights like the unavoidable Hackett transmission), but eh. It's DLC.
<_<
#25
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 07:59
Mr. MannlyMan wrote...
JeffZero wrote...
I'm not thrilled with the idea of being able to do LotSB and especially Arrival before SM but the thing that really irks me is how Hackett's transmission is an unavoidable post-Horizon stint. While it's not too difficult to explain away Shepard's decision to put it on hold given how little information about what's really going Hackett possesses (sure it's Reaper-related but colonies are vanishing quickly) the whole notion still manages to get to me.
I don't think Bioware considered it to be important at the time. Still gets on my nerves when it seems to cause confusion among the fans (especially when it comes to silly oversights like the unavoidable Hackett transmission), but eh. It's DLC.
<_<
Yeah. It is a shame though... I mean, most of us experienced it for the first time by uploading an old file but having the very-much-post-SM mission get its intro halfway through the game was... well, it was a bit of a shock.
Ah well.





Retour en haut







