1169 réponses à ce sujet

[shepskisaac]

Fiery Phoenix wrote...

spiros9110 wrote...

So Thane is their secret feature "X", "W", whatever the letter. Sounds good.

It isn't. Obviously the bit about Thane was taken from a larger article.

And Palaven bit too. Untless the entire article is 2 paragraphs long lol

[Robhuzz]

Jonathan Shepard wrote...

Mesina2 wrote...

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

jreezy wrote...

Oh snap, Thane cure. I knew it was possible.

Just the kind of weak storytelling one would expect at this point.

Well Thane did say Hanars are trying to cure that diseases and we do have almost a year for that to happen.

As long as it's Thane vs. every other Drell with Kepral's, then I'm kind of okay with this. Still, considering his "incurable" disease, and Mordin's age, I was expecting both of them to die to make it easier on BioWare. I do approve of their inclusion, but a cure for Thane seems... seems kind of like a copout from a really good, personal death scene. I guess it's because justice for FemSheps who romanced him has gotta be served.

Why does Thane need to be cured of his illness? Among the first things he said in ME2 was that he was dying from a disease to which there was no cure. And that, while the Hanar are working on a cure, it would not arrive soon enough to help Thane. That added a lot to his character and while I know it's far too soon to be drawing conclusions, especially since it's based on a leaked article with no way to really verify the info, it sounds like BW is trying to take the easy way out of their previously established plot line by somehow having a cure for Thane's illness now.

[Mr.House]

Yay for more hanar and Thane.

[aridor1570]

Wait a minute, the article didn't talk about any new feature but it did talk about the story?
If this is true, well, some "I told you so." should be handed out.(regarding multiplayer)

[Someone With Mass]

AwesomeName wrote...

aridor1570 wrote...

Wait a minute, the article didn't talk about any new feature but it did talk about the story?
If this is true, well, some "I told you so." should be handed out.(regarding multiplayer)

I think only a small chunk of the article was leaked.

The rest got deleated because it's apparently a spoiler. Yeah, thanks a bunch, Chris.<_<

Modifié par Someone With Mass, 08 octobre 2011 - 04:27 .

[Vertigo_1]

AwesomeName wrote...

Oh so the whole thing was leaked on here, then?

Just two paragraphs were put up before mod came in and deleted them, which detailed two different missions: one involving Thane.

Modifié par Vertigo_1, 08 octobre 2011 - 04:23 .

[aridor1570]

But it is also worth noting that the whole article got leaked.

[Vertigo_1]

aridor1570 wrote...

But it is also worth noting that the whole article got leaked.

Yes, and to your earlier post there was no mention of multiplayer in said article:

JigPig wrote...

This issue was leaked last night. The article has no mention of multiplayer, its a story/character reveal. I'll try and get a hold of the magazine scans, however I can not post them here.

This post was left untouched by the mods^^^

Modifié par Vertigo_1, 08 octobre 2011 - 04:26 .

[aridor1570]

Vertigo_1 wrote...

aridor1570 wrote...

But it is also worth noting that the whole article got leaked.

Yes, and to your earlier post there was no mention of multiplayer in said article:

JigPig wrote...

Edited by moderator.

No spoilers in General Discussion please! .

This post was left untouched by the mods^^^

What's the point on deleating that post if MP is NOT in the article,let alone mentioned in it?

Modifié par Selene Moonsong, 09 octobre 2011 - 01:59 .

[SNascimento]

So it's not multiplayer? That is sad

[Kusy]

Yeeeah, I expected that to be honest. Let's wait to see what the "killer feature" was then.

Modifié par Mr.Kusy, 08 octobre 2011 - 04:59 .

[gammameggon]

What exactly was leaked? Please clarify the details.

[Complistic]

SNascimento wrote...

So it's not multiplayer? That is sad

Don't worry, everyone is free to get their hopes up again next time the rumor mill starts up.

[SNascimento]

Complistic wrote...

SNascimento wrote...

So it's not multiplayer? That is sad

Don't worry, everyone is free to get their hopes up again next time the rumor mill starts up.

.
So true. 

[onelifecrisis]

SNascimento wrote...

So it's not multiplayer? That is sad

It's multiplayer. Wait and see.

[Pepper4]

So the whole issue is now floating in the internet?

[whywhywhywhy]

didymos1120 wrote...

whywhywhywhy wrote...

Again, what does any of this have to do with the series including more FPS design/content?

I can safely say the series has very little in the way of First-Person Shooter design/content.

I think I'm going to find the very first post I made on this and link it in my signature so I have to stop correcting people like you.  Here's the short version.

FPS's historically have had when they made the shift from 2D to 3D multiple camera perspectives the game could be played with, 3rd person was/is one of those perspectives.  Given that the 3rd person perspective is a game engine camera function in a FPS game it cannot be it's own seperate genre but at best a sub-genre of FPS or shooters.  So any reference to it as a FPS or shooter is correct.  Thus the term TPS is just an attempt by marketing to label a game with a new "buzz" word.  Thank you.

[Arcadian Legend]

Ah, well this blows my piloting the Normandy theory to shreds. Still, I'm excited about this new squaddie.

[Blacklash93]

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

jreezy wrote...

Oh snap, Thane cure. I knew it was possible.

Just the kind of weak storytelling one would expect at this point.

Fanservice does not equate to weak storytelling.

Anyway, I missed out on the details...  I feel really pathetic for asking this, but could someone fill me in via PM? I would really appretiate it.

[Someone With Mass]

whywhywhywhy wrote...

I think I'm going to find the very first post I made on this and link it in my signature so I have to stop correcting people like you.  Here's the short version.

FPS's historically have had when they made the shift from 2D to 3D multiple camera perspectives the game could be played with, 3rd person was/is one of those perspectives.  Given that the 3rd person perspective is a game engine camera function in a FPS game it cannot be it's own seperate genre but at best a sub-genre of FPS or shooters.  So any reference to it as a FPS or shooter is correct.  Thus the term TPS is just an attempt by marketing to label a game with a new "buzz" word.  Thank you.

That must be the most stupidest thing I've heard all year.

Read up instead of making it up.

Relationship to first-person shooters
These games are closely related to first-person shooters, which also tie the perspective of the player to an avatar, but the two genres are distinct. While the first-person perspective allows players to aim and shoot without their avatar blocking their view, the third-person shooter shows the protagonist from an "over the shoulder shot" or "behind the back" perspective. Thus, the third-person perspective allows the game designer to create a more strongly characterized avatar, and directs the player's attention as if watching a film. In contrast, a first-person perspective provides the player with greater immersion into the game universe.


Also, I'd like to see you name a first person shooter where the character can do a dodge roll without being slightly disoriented.

Modifié par Someone With Mass, 08 octobre 2011 - 08:32 .