157 réponses à ce sujet

[firefireblow]

TAJ4Life wrote...

firefireblow wrote...

TAJ4Life wrote...

I know that many of you lack common sense and brain cells and without reading what I have said you come out with the usual nerd rage attacks but ME1 played and felt better, ME2 look better visually but a lot of the things that made it an RPG was taken out.

ME3 is NOT far better looking than ME2 I know I was there and played the 360 version, I have played ME2 on the Xbox 360 also.

And a 10min demo? Lol err ok you lot got more excuses? This is why I hate posting on sites sometimes, people that have an actual thing to say about a game get torn to shreds yet most of you will post complaining about the most dumbest things ever.

I stand by what I said originally, ME3 is not a huge improvement over ME2, yes ME1 had static environements but in this gen there is no reason for static boring environments and that is why I also say ME3 doesnt look any better than ME2 just more smokes and mirrors with lighting.

And if ME3 turns out to have multiplayer then it will make even more sense to why ME3 is gimped.

yes that is right tell us off we don't know anything you are so smart why cant i be as smarts as you i wish i was smarts as you then i would writes smarts things too.

Your response made no sense but that is expected.

no shiot it wasn't shee hows smarts you are.

Modifié par firefireblow, 01 octobre 2011 - 05:38 .

[TAJ4Life]

Anyways I have have said my piece on how I feel ME3 is and played, I am not slating the developer neither is my initial response rating and raving its constructive. I am meerly providing feedback of what I experienced in my own view of how ME3 came across and felt.

So again its just some feedback I have played many games by Bioware and all the games I have played I have played 4-5 times each as the gameplay has always been fantastic.

I just hope in their future titles they are able to put more into the game which we the gamer benefit at the end of the day.

[The-Person]

TAJ4Life wrote...

I know that many of you lack common sense and brain cells and without reading what I have said you come out with the usual nerd rage attacks but ME1 played and felt better, ME2 look better visually but a lot of the things that made it an RPG was taken out.

ME3 is NOT far better looking than ME2 I know I was there and played the 360 version, I have played ME2 on the Xbox 360 also.

And a 10min demo? Lol err ok you lot got more excuses? This is why I hate posting on sites sometimes, people that have an actual thing to say about a game get torn to shreds yet most of you will post complaining about the most dumbest things ever.

I stand by what I said originally, ME3 is not a huge improvement over ME2, yes ME1 had static environements but in this gen there is no reason for static boring environments and that is why I also say ME3 doesnt look any better than ME2 just more smokes and mirrors with lighting.

And if ME3 turns out to have multiplayer then it will make even more sense to why ME3 is gimped.

And I am say that ME1 looked and played worse then ME2. I played the demo at PAX this year, and thought it played better then both ME1 and ME2. Then again, your name calling sure has me convinced.

[Nashiktal]

I am one of the biggest criticizers of the Mass Effect series, but I have to disagree mate. I have seen plenty of improvements in ME3 by videos alone. Whether its in the graphics engine, or animations, to a larger boost in powers (and more than two evolutions for current powers) improvement in sound, weapon models, visuals have gone up, you get the point.

I may not like everything happening in ME3 so far, but it is definitely approving.

[ALex360]

If you dont like it,dont play it,its simple.Also:

Your blind.
The graphics are far better.
The gameplay is better.
ME2 is better than ME.
Deal with it.[2]

[whywhywhywhy]

Well given the game engine I don't think we'll see a huge leap.

[JimiShep]

Captain Crash wrote...

Righttttttt.....

OP did you even watch this video???????

[AdmiralCheez]

TAJ4Life wrote...

I know that many of you lack common sense and brain cells and without reading what I have said you come out with the usual nerd rage attacks but ME1 played and felt better, ME2 look better visually but a lot of the things that made it an RPG was taken out.

For the love of god, don't tell me you missed the inventory.  I'll admit ME2 felt too boxed-in compared to the first, but seriously, what RPG elements so essential to your gaming experience are missing?

Brain cells comment = troll probability at 56%

ME3 is NOT far better looking than ME2 I know I was there and played the 360 version, I have played ME2 on the Xbox 360 also.

I played ME2 on a PC, and from screenshots and demo footage alone I have concluded that ME3 looks a helluva lot better.  For one thing, the shadows are realistic now and don't turn everyone into Michael Jackson every time they step partially into the shade.

And a 10min demo? Lol err ok you lot got more excuses? This is why I hate posting on sites sometimes, people that have an actual thing to say about a game get torn to shreds yet most of you will post complaining about the most dumbest things ever.

Ten minutes of fighting through mooks is not enough time to show off all those rich roleplaying features you want so badly.  It was a combat demo, therefore it showed off the combat.  They're not going to give you ten minutes of running around talking to people or putzing around with the color of your armor.

"I hate it here, people are dumb" = troll probability at 72%

I stand by what I said originally, ME3 is not a huge improvement over ME2, yes ME1 had static environements but in this gen there is no reason for static boring environments and that is why I also say ME3 doesnt look any better than ME2 just more smokes and mirrors with lighting.

Tobe fair, ME2 was a pretty good game and they didn't have to fix much.  Mostly the lighting and a few combat/customization things.

You are going to have to explain your definition of "static" and "boring," though.  Because I'm pretty sure leaping from cover to cover while tossing around baddies and darting under the stride of a heavy mech isn't boring or static.

And if ME3 turns out to have multiplayer then it will make even more sense to why ME3 is gimped.

I'm not too fond of multi, either, but it's not like it'll kill the game.  Dead Space 2's core game was better than the first, even though it had multiplayer.  But the multi bit sucked and everyone ignored it, focusing on the better-than-the-original single-player experience.  I'm basing this assumption on critical reviews and the opinions of my friends since I haven't beaten both yet, but you get my drift.

I have reached the conclusion that you are either trolling or just bitter as hell that ME2 didn't play like an ME1 expansion pack.

[nelly21]

TAJ4Life wrote...

This is why I hate posting on sites sometimes...

Ironically enough, threads like this one is why we hate you posting on websites

[Tup3x]

It looks marginally better but to be honest, isn't it rather obvious? You can't really squeeze more performance out of the consoles any more. Consoles are the same and PC user suffer because current generation is 10x more powerful (not talking about dual GPU solutions). Not long and smart phones are faster... Heck, Galaxy S2 for example already has 2x more RAM than Xbox 360.

Modifié par Tup3xi, 01 octobre 2011 - 05:54 .

[Carfax]

To me, ME2 was average at best in the looks department. The art style was good, but as usual with Bioware games, the texture quality was uneven and lacking suffcient detail....because Bioware had the malaise to not use upgraded textures for the PC version, and instead, used the same crappy Xbox textures.

Bioware should fire all of their graphics designers, because many of the textures in ME2 looked absolutely unprofessional.

[Tup3x]

Carfax wrote...

To me, ME2 was average at best in the looks department. The art style was good, but as usual with Bioware games, the texture quality was uneven and lacking suffcient detail....because Bioware had the malaise to not use upgraded textures for the PC version, and instead, used the same crappy Xbox textures.

Bioware should fire all of their graphics designers, because many of the textures in ME2 looked absolutely unprofessional.

It's pure laziness to not give PC users high resolution textures. If they are really working with low resolution textures from start to finish I don't really know what to think about them...

[Someone With Mass]

Tup3xi wrote...

It looks marginally better but to be honest, isn't it rather obvious? You can't really squeeze more performance out of the consoles any more. Consoles are the same and PC user suffer because current generation is 10x more powerful (not talking about dual GPU solutions). Not long and smart phones are faster... Heck, Galaxy S2 for example already has 2x more RAM than Xbox 360.

Good.

Now, give me a real reason to care, since I'm not a graphics wh*re.

[AdmiralCheez]

I hate it when PC players rage about graphics. It makes me feel guilty for playing on PC.

[nelly21]

AdmiralCheez wrote...

I hate it when PC players rage about graphics. It makes me feel guilty for playing on PC.

Don't feel guilty Cheez. Just act the same way I act with my family.

"What? Who, them? Oh I was adopted."

[Bail_Darilar]

Dude everything you said was pure opinion not fact. If you came out and posted some kind of evidence to back your claims like screenshots or a video (such as what the poster above did) with annotations explaining what you mean people would take this as a discussion rather than a rant by a disgruntled gamer.

It doesnt help that you act superior just because your opinion differs from those who enjoyed ME2 over ME1. Personally I prefer ME2 over ME1, I also am an avid RPG gamer but I appreciate the lighter take on the RPG formula employed in ME2 as I feel it suits the game better. Yet again this is an opinion and others (including you) can have their own and differ from my views, but don't go spouting opinion as fact it just serves to make you look ignorant.

[Fixers0]

 If Bioware really wanted to update the Graphics They should add things that improve the imersion, such as.

-Teselation.

-Real time Local reflections.

-SSDO.

-HDR motion Blur.

- Realistic Contact Shadows.

The should also start working on visual aesthetics again and spend less time working on putting explosions all over the screen.

[nelly21]

It's funny. Every time I read posts by the ubergraphics people (or any rpg elitist for that matter), in my head, I hear them with a volus voice.

"I have extremely high performance requirements. I need something that says I own this room. I own YOU."

It makes it less annoying.