4 réponses à ce sujet

[M4ster]

WHat is better safe? xD Critical choose kill many life or save Alliance?

[Mr Zoat]

I always save the people. Won't know the outcome -if there is one- until ME3.

[Bogsnot1]

Dont play the mission. That way, the missiles will forever be in limbo and you dont have to chose.

[Nyysjan]

I always pick the option that keeps the outpost viable in the long term (can't remember wich it was, paceport i think).
Sure, sucks for the all the hundreds of civilians who died, but long term repercussions for loosing the outpost would/could have been lot worse.
But then again, my sheppard has the ruthless (and spacer) background, and i try to play like it when opportunity comes up (still end up taking paragon options most of the time though, not that many real choices where you have to pick between being nice and being effective).

[Jure Simich]

Save the people. There's a ton of empty colonies with all the viable infrastructure intact available, thanks to the collectors...