232 réponses à ce sujet

[Computer_God91]

Shinobu wrote...

Thanks. I don't think it's ever appropriate for anyone to suggest someone else's death, so I can understand you being extremely aggravated by that. But can't we all dial it back a bit like we've been doing and leave out the "grow some balls you spoiled wuss I hope bioware disappoints you and you choke on your own tears no offense" stuff? (It's multiple posters, not just you.)  If someone is too extreme, ignore them until they calm down or go away. Probably I shouldn't have said "ragequit" in my first post or used a smiley as I was semi-joking, but you did reply: "Good. I want people like you to rage quit the francise. That just means
all of you that do don't have the stones to live with someone you adore
dying."

I can respect your opinion that you think sh*t should happen in war, including the possibility of scripted death for Garrus. I can explain why I'm against that. If we still disagree after explaining our positions, let's just shake hands and walk away. Seriously, I'm a girl, so I'm not gonna grow balls no matter how many people tell me to.

Actually, I'm enjoying this discussion -- now that it's actually a discussion.

Well then you and I should just shake hands and walk away because we've explained our positions and still disagree. I honestly support some scripted deaths regardless who it is because if everyone (with a name) in the series was able to survive what has been built up as impossible to defeat machine genocidists then it would be really cheap story telling. "Oh they're invincible machines but we all managed to survive." Is lame to me. Some people should die no matter what.

However, I like what you suggested earlier with the Sidonis Palivan situation. Based on choices you made in ME1 or ME2 different people would have "scripted" deaths. For example Garrus or Tali will die in ME3, it can't be avoided, but based on choices you made throughout the series decides if Garrus has a "scripted" death or Tali has it. So someone important dies in ME3 and it can't be avoided, but your choices do matter to an extent. I think that would be cooler then a multiple choice "Who do you want to die?" button like Virmire. That way you are, to a certain degree, not in control of who dies but you are because of the past. That would be cooler and I could support something like that.

Modifié par Computer_God91, 08 octobre 2011 - 05:37 .

[LilyasAvalon]

Mesina2 wrote...

Garrus CAN die, like everyone else.

This, but i'd rather have an emotional death if he CAN die. It feels more complete than the whole 'Sorry Shep, good luck' I got in an ME2 playthrough.

[Neverwinter_Knight77]

Kakita Tatsumaru wrote...

Won't cry for that.
Actually making people cry for a video game is awfully hard, so good luck on that.

I cried during Metal Gear Solid 4 because I felt so bad for Solid Snake.

Garrus...  He and Wrex are the most awesome characters in Mass Effect.

1. He's a turian, so he's got coolness points right there.

2. He's a really cool guy; reminds me a lot of myself (personality-wise).

The only thing that bothered me is that, during the last part of ME2, no matter what your decision was on the base, he seems disappointed, hahaha.

[JeffZero]

^ I dunno, he visibly smirks after the communication line is cut if you gave him the base.

Modifié par JeffZero, 08 octobre 2011 - 05:31 .

[Neverwinter_Knight77]

But he says something like "I hope you know what you're doing. I just hope we don't end up needing that base later." if you blow it up.

If you don't blow it up, he and all of the others seem to scold you about it.

Modifié par Neverwinter_Knight77, 08 octobre 2011 - 05:38 .

[Romantiq]

That's be a bad move on their part.

[Shinobu]

Computer_God91 wrote...

Well then you and I should just shake hands and walk away because we've explained our positions and still disagree. I honestly support some scripted deaths regardless who it is because if everyone (with a name) in the series was able to survive what has been built up as impossible to defeat machine genocidists then it would be really cheap story telling. "Oh they're invincible machines but we all managed to survive." Is lame to me. Some people should die no matter what.

However, I like what you suggested earlier with the Sidonis Palivan situation. Based on choices you made in ME1 or ME2 different people would have "scripted" deaths. For example Garrus or Tali will die in ME3, it can't be avoided, but based on choices you made throughout the series decides if Garrus has a "scripted" death or Tali has it. So someone important dies in ME3 and it can't be avoided, but your choices do matter to an extent. I think that would be cooler then a multiple choice "Who do you want to die?" button like Virmire. That way you are, to a certain degree, not in control of who dies but you are because of the past. That would be cooler and I could support something like that.

I could also accept that. Let's shake on it.

[Computer_God91]

Shinobu wrote...

Computer_God91 wrote...

Well then you and I should just shake hands and walk away because we've explained our positions and still disagree. I honestly support some scripted deaths regardless who it is because if everyone (with a name) in the series was able to survive what has been built up as impossible to defeat machine genocidists then it would be really cheap story telling. "Oh they're invincible machines but we all managed to survive." Is lame to me. Some people should die no matter what.

However, I like what you suggested earlier with the Sidonis Palivan situation. Based on choices you made in ME1 or ME2 different people would have "scripted" deaths. For example Garrus or Tali will die in ME3, it can't be avoided, but based on choices you made throughout the series decides if Garrus has a "scripted" death or Tali has it. So someone important dies in ME3 and it can't be avoided, but your choices do matter to an extent. I think that would be cooler then a multiple choice "Who do you want to die?" button like Virmire. That way you are, to a certain degree, not in control of who dies but you are because of the past. That would be cooler and I could support something like that.

I could also accept that. Let's shake on it.

Deal. *insert shake here*