972 réponses à ce sujet

[UnadoptedTrack]

DuckSoup wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Fiery Phoenix wrote...
EA fails to understand this, though.

Or that a singleplayer game can be good enough on its own.

The idiot who said that multiplayer is the future shouldn't be allowed to work with video games at all.

 Bit of an extreme reaction, don't you think? 

Besides, they know that a single player game works successfully on a stand-alone basis, but this isn't just about those who want to play single player. There are other people in the world and those other people want to play MP. It's so selfish to complain about an optional extra that you don't even have to take part in.

I fear I'm just banging my head against a brick wall, though.

Wear a helmet.

[Jussylein]

Stupid News, Evil Chris has Lied Day for Day, Me have not MP an what is Me3 have MP, Ea destroyed Bioware. Thats really sad News.

[Lunatic LK47]

DuckSoup wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Fiery Phoenix wrote...
EA fails to understand this, though.

Or that a singleplayer game can be good enough on its own.

The idiot who said that multiplayer is the future shouldn't be allowed to work with video games at all.

 Bit of an extreme reaction, don't you think? 

Besides, they know that a single player game works successfully on a stand-alone basis, but this isn't just about those who want to play single player. There are other people in the world and those other people want to play MP. It's so selfish to complain about an optional extra that you don't even have to take part in.

I fear I'm just banging my head against a brick wall, though.

An optional extra with AN ARTIFICIAL TIME LIMIT. I've played enough UbiSoft games to tell me that multiplayer shouldn't be the "Be all, end all" solution. Last time I checked for games that shoehorned in multiplayer for the later entries of established franchises, how many people are still playing Resident Evil 5, Lost Planet 2, F.E.A.R. 3, Dead Space 2, or BioShock 2 online RIGHT NOW?

Modifié par Lunatic LK47, 10 octobre 2011 - 10:25 .

[RamirezWolfen]

Melrache wrote...

sam726 wrote...

co-op is cool but not multiplayer, btw, Shepard looks pretty bad

Co-op is even worse than random multiplayer. This is no Gears of War.

It's not. And multiplayer will not make it more like it. Just because a game has some features that are similar to another game doesn't mean it's a bad thing.

[AdmiralCheez]

Hathur wrote...

... afterall I did enjoy playing Neverwinter Nights and Baldur's Gate 1&2 in co-op multiplayer many many years ago.

Wait.  classic Bioware RPGs with multiplayer?  Before they sold out to EA and started catering to the low-brow masses?

This... this changes everything.  I need to lie down.

Modifié par AdmiralCheez, 10 octobre 2011 - 10:27 .

[Izhalezan]

Lunatic LK47 wrote...

Last time I checked, how many people are still playing F.E.A.R. 3, Dead Space 2, or BioShock 2 online RIGHT NOW?

None of my friends even want to do Fear co-op....

[UnadoptedTrack]

wiggles89 wrote...

Will it have hats and sandviches?

... *Sigh*

[Xewaka]

Whenever people start frothing at the mouth due to multiplayer rejection rage, I always feel the obligation to remind people that Baldur's Gate and Baldur's Gate 2 had multiplayer, and it didn't diminish the experience.

[CaptainZaysh]

Lunatic LK47 wrote...

An optional extra with AN ARTIFICIAL TIME LIMIT. I've played enough UbiSoft games to tell me that multiplayer shouldn't be the "Be all, end all" solution. Last time I checked for games that shoehorned in multiplayer for the later entries of established franchises, how many people are still playing Resident Evil 5, Lost Planet 2, F.E.A.R. 3, Dead Space 2, or BioShock 2 online RIGHT NOW?

I think the BSN will keep Mass Effect MP alive.

[Lunatic LK47]

Izhalezan wrote...

None of my friends even want to do Fear co-op....

Probably for good reason.

[Melra]

RamirezWolfen wrote...

Melrache wrote...

sam726 wrote...

co-op is cool but not multiplayer, btw, Shepard looks pretty bad

Co-op is even worse than random multiplayer. This is no Gears of War.

It's not. And multiplayer will not make it more like it. Just because a game has some features that are similar to another game doesn't mean it's a bad thing.

It does, they should just stick to what they're good at and improve those. Not add these silly extra features, that other companies do far better.

[RamirezWolfen]

Xewaka wrote...

Whenever people start frothing at the mouth due to multiplayer rejection rage, I always feel the obligation to remind people that Baldur's Gate and Baldur's Gate 2 had multiplayer, and it didn't diminish the experience.

And that a lot of other games that are very popular or well recieved had multiplayer.

[ItsPhilsTime]

DuckSoup wrote...

UnadoptedTrack wrote...

My biggest problem with co-op would be one that I stated earlier, with "who would be who".

I doubt they will run the main campaign as co-op. I should imagine it'll be Deathmatch and Fire-fight etc.

That right there is what I'm afraid of but I think they'll make it where its Co-op if they even end up doing it, I'm just wounder what they going to do make it like Fable and split the cash and XP or what, which XP you get on ME after completing a mission?!?!?!

[Someone With Mass]

Lunatic LK47 wrote...

An optional extra with AN ARTIFICIAL TIME LIMIT. I've played enough UbiSoft games to tell me that multiplayer shouldn't be the "Be all, end all" solution. Last time I checked for games that shoehorned in multiplayer for the later entries of established franchises, how many people are still playing Resident Evil 5, Lost Planet 2, F.E.A.R. 3, Dead Space 2, or BioShock 2 online RIGHT NOW?

My guess: Fifty.

Could be either because of the crappy advertising or because the multiplayer is crappy.

Sometimes it's both.

[UnadoptedTrack]

ItsPhilsTime wrote...

DuckSoup wrote...

UnadoptedTrack wrote...

My biggest problem with co-op would be one that I stated earlier, with "who would be who".

I doubt they will run the main campaign as co-op. I should imagine it'll be Deathmatch and Fire-fight etc.

That right there is what I'm afraid of but I think they'll make it where its Co-op if they even end up doing it, I'm just wounder what they going to do make it like Fable and split the cash and XP or what, which XP you get on ME after completing a mission?!?!?!

...What?

[Michael177]

Lunatic LK47 wrote...

Last time I checked, how many people are still playing F.E.A.R. 3, Dead Space 2, or BioShock 2 online RIGHT NOW?

That's a good point, but as I said, as long as it's required to get the story line or additional story line parts I'll be happy... because if it isn't I can see myself playing ME 1-3 every year =p.

Although... if it does have additional storyline parts, i can't see anyone playing it 5 years from now, or 6 months after release like any other multiplayer game other than the obvious ones.

[K_Tabris]

I wouldn't mind co-op, but I am not about to run into another Halo MP episode. Kids should reach the age of 21 before they should be allowed to play games, if they can't behave.

[JediHealerCosmin]

Wow...

Wow, seriously wow...


How the hell will MP even work ? 
Let me guess: TIM actually managed to clone Shepard during the Lazarus Project.

Again... wow. Somebody shoot me.

[ItsPhilsTime]

UnadoptedTrack wrote...

wiggles89 wrote...

Will it have hats and sandviches?

... *Sigh*

That would not happen, there is to many people that for the Xbox buy it and don't have gold, for others theres people who get it without Internet, yes there is people out there that still dont have internet lol.

[Centauri2002]

Xewaka wrote...

Whenever people start frothing at the mouth due to multiplayer rejection rage, I always feel the obligation to remind people that Baldur's Gate and Baldur's Gate 2 had multiplayer, and it didn't diminish the experience.

I'd just like to point out that multiplayer was a part of that from the very first game. 

That said, it does go to show BioWare can implement it well. Although, it was a different kind of RPG but I'm not feeling particularly bad about the news of multiplayer in ME3. I'm just a bit irked that they went back on a statement they made earlier and that multiplayer seems to get into everything these days. 

[UnadoptedTrack]

NovinhaShepard wrote...

I wouldn't mind co-op, but I am not about to run into another Halo MP episode. Kids should reach the age of 21 before they should be allowed to play games, if they can't behave.

I think 18 would be fine.

[RamirezWolfen]

Melrache wrote...

RamirezWolfen wrote...

Melrache wrote...

sam726 wrote...

co-op is cool but not multiplayer, btw, Shepard looks pretty bad

Co-op is even worse than random multiplayer. This is no Gears of War.

It's not. And multiplayer will not make it more like it. Just because a game has some features that are similar to another game doesn't mean it's a bad thing.

It does, they should just stick to what they're good at and improve those. Not add these silly extra features, that other companies do far better.

Quite often developers try new things. And we really can't say that other companies do it better if Bioware hasn't even tried.