Modifié par SuperNova42, 10 octobre 2011 - 10:48 .
Modifié par TobyHasEyes, 10 octobre 2011 - 10:44 .
Pepper4 wrote...
We are going to know everything about the mutiplayer on the 19th. Possibly earlier. Till then, let's stop guessing what kind of mutiplayer it is going to be.
Guest_Aotearas_*
Ruud333 wrote...
(Assuming the rumour is true this time) I can't believe I'm at work when MP got (sort of) confirmed! Ive spent the past hour or so trying to read this thread in my iPhone as gaming sites are blocked in my office.
Again assuming it's true, I wonder what the 'it's been denied a thousand times' brigade will have to say ;-)
Ruud333 wrote...
(Assuming the rumour is true this time) I can't believe I'm at work when MP got (sort of) confirmed! Ive spent the past hour or so trying to read this thread in my iPhone as gaming sites are blocked in my office.
Again assuming it's true, I wonder what the 'it's been denied a thousand times' brigade will have to say ;-)
TobyHasEyes wrote...
Its probably a common view, but for me I don't have any issue with ME multiplayer in itself, it could be fun
It just sucks that you can be sure it has taken time away that could have been used to make the single player campaign even better, and it is that story that I am invested in, and this is their last chance to bring together the story and make the choices count
If the single player turns out to be great, then I'll have no problem with the multiplayer.. but if it is so-so you will just keep looking at the 'Multiplayer' in the main menu and thinking.. damn you
DuckSoup wrote...
First of all, you have completely misinterpreted the EA publicists quote. From reading that, the person is suggesting that we can no longer just have single player games where it's all guns ablazing and no real plot or storyline. Presumably because more and more gamers are enjoying the more immersive worlds of games such as Mass Effect and Dragon Age: Origins.
Secondly, all those games you mentioned still have single-player as their main element. Maybe the campaigns weren't as good because the games themselves were running out of Steam. As far as we know, Mass Effect still has a lot of life left. Stop making assumptions based on other games and other production companies.
Guest_DuckSoup_*
TobyHasEyes wrote...
It just sucks that you can be sure it has taken time away that could have been used to make the single player campaign even better, and it is that story that I am invested in, and this is their last chance to bring together the story and make the choices count
Gravity Bun wrote...
I don't know why this is such a polarizing issue.
If you don't like/don't want multiplayer, don't play it.
Don't know about entire brigade, but I'll raise eyebrow, say "it happens" and will wait for details.Ruud333 wrote...
<...>
Again assuming it's true, I wonder what the 'it's been denied a thousand times' brigade will have to say ;-)
Calm down, Pacino.Lunatic LK47 wrote...
Tootles FTW wrote...
No need to bash other games. I loved RE5 and (gasp) FEAR 3 co-op, and will play them quite often when a friend is ready & willing. Also, those are examples that don't really apply since co-op was the crux of gameplay in RE5 and FEAR 3, whereas it will be an optional mode in ME3.
And "shoe-horned in" multiplayer in a decidedly singleplayer game does not equate a death sentence to either the core game or the MP experience...as someone mentioned before, Red Dead Redemption's MP was actually pretty solid and the main story certainly did not suffer from it's inclusion.
Uh, Rockstar is the EXCEPTION TO THE RULE (i.e. Sandbox games in general have more flexibility). Other games, not so much.
Lunatic LK47 wrote...
DuckSoup wrote...
First of all, you have completely misinterpreted the EA publicists quote. From reading that, the person is suggesting that we can no longer just have single player games where it's all guns ablazing and no real plot or storyline. Presumably because more and more gamers are enjoying the more immersive worlds of games such as Mass Effect and Dragon Age: Origins.
Uh, no. That quote was something along the line of "Every game must have some type of online element. Vanilla single-player games is no longer desirable." I remember reading that article vividly.Secondly, all those games you mentioned still have single-player as their main element. Maybe the campaigns weren't as good because the games themselves were running out of Steam. As far as we know, Mass Effect still has a lot of life left. Stop making assumptions based on other games and other production companies.
Uh, no. Resident Evil's majority of the franchise was SINGLE PLAYER. Last time I checked, only 3 of them had co-op (i.e. Two crappy Wii games and RE5). Single-player is a chore because of how bad the partner A.I. is, and last time I checked, I had to rely on using my friend as a crutch just to play the harder difficulties. F.E.A.R. 3, developers changed hands, and last but not least, they had to rely on using co-op as a gimmick just to hype the game, and last time I checked, no one played online TWO MONTHS AFTER RELEASE.
I've also played enough Tom Clancy games to know that their life span is ridiculously short. Splinter Cell: Pandora Tomorrow and Chaos Theory for the X-Box? Bought them at $9.99 in 2006, and guess what, barely anyone playing. Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2? Bought them at $19.99 ON APRIL 2010. Guess what, No one online. Rainbow Six Vegas 2, SAME DAY, SAME PRICE. Only less than A DOZEN PLAYERS.
DuckSoup wrote...
Maybe they are completely happy with all the time and money gone into the single player element and are now creating the MP as a seperate thing? What if they actually have two seperate teams of people working on the two different elements? It's been a year and half and they've put the release date back further, so maybe that's to accommodate the creation of MP? We have no idea what they have been doing.
Guest_DuckSoup_*
Lunatic LK47 wrote...
DuckSoup wrote...
First of all, you have completely misinterpreted the EA publicists quote. From reading that, the person is suggesting that we can no longer just have single player games where it's all guns ablazing and no real plot or storyline. Presumably because more and more gamers are enjoying the more immersive worlds of games such as Mass Effect and Dragon Age: Origins.
Uh, no. That quote was something along the line of "Every game must have some type of online element. Vanilla single-player games is no longer desirable." I remember reading that article vividly.Secondly, all those games you mentioned still have single-player as their main element. Maybe the campaigns weren't as good because the games themselves were running out of Steam. As far as we know, Mass Effect still has a lot of life left. Stop making assumptions based on other games and other production companies.
Uh, no. Resident Evil's majority of the franchise was SINGLE PLAYER. Last time I checked, only 3 of them had co-op (i.e. Two crappy Wii games and RE5). Single-player is a chore because of how bad the partner A.I. is, and last time I checked, I had to rely on using my friend as a crutch just to play the harder difficulties. F.E.A.R. 3, developers changed hands, and last but not least, they had to rely on using co-op as a gimmick just to hype the game, and last time I checked, no one played online TWO MONTHS AFTER RELEASE.
I've also played enough Tom Clancy games to know that their life span is ridiculously short. Splinter Cell: Pandora Tomorrow and Chaos Theory for the X-Box? Bought them at $9.99 in 2006, and guess what, barely anyone playing. Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2? Bought them at $19.99 ON APRIL 2010. Guess what, No one online. Rainbow Six Vegas 2, SAME DAY, SAME PRICE. Only less than A DOZEN PLAYERS.
Modifié par DuckSoup, 10 octobre 2011 - 10:55 .
Kabanya101 wrote...
Ah yes, "multiplayer." As if enough things didn't ruin ME2, now they just want to do the same to ME3.
Kabanya101 wrote...
Ah yes, "multiplayer." As if enough things didn't ruin ME2, now they just want to do the same to ME3.
Modifié par Wannabe_Overlord, 10 octobre 2011 - 10:57 .
Guest_DuckSoup_*
Lunatic LK47 wrote...
DuckSoup wrote...
Maybe they are completely happy with all the time and money gone into the single player element and are now creating the MP as a seperate thing? What if they actually have two seperate teams of people working on the two different elements? It's been a year and half and they've put the release date back further, so maybe that's to accommodate the creation of MP? We have no idea what they have been doing.
Medal of Honor 2010 had 2 separate teams, and guess what, both aspects of the game were mediocre (even when DICE of Battlefield fame was responsible for the multiplayer.). I also remember Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway having similar problems (i.e. Rockstar being responsible for multiplayer.)
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut