972 réponses à ce sujet

[dayvancowboy1]

 it's my birthday today

[Lunatic LK47]

DuckSoup wrote...
You need to relax. 

Why do you care if other people play MP or not? It's down to whether you enjoy it, not what other people think.

Look, genius. Gamer community= Chances of playing multiplayer. No community= No multiplayer games.  Simple common sense logic. Second of all, Price of a video game in the U.S. is $70 including taxes. I'm not going to shell $70 for a four-hour long game. I'm not even shelling out $70 for a game that may be riddled with glitches or bugs in single-player just because the devs wanted to focus so much on a multiplayer that HAS A TIME LIMIT.

[Lunatic LK47]

DuckSoup wrote...

As far as I can see you're referencing games that had already exceeded their sell-by-date.

Critical thinking skills. Multiplayer's gimmick is all about "PLAY NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW!" What about those gamers that are on the fence about it? Price drops are not even an option. What are you going to say "**** you for being cautious?"

[TobyHasEyes]

DuckSoup wrote...

TobyHasEyes wrote...

 It just sucks that you can be sure it has taken time away that could have been used to make the single player campaign even better, and it is that story that I am invested in, and this is their last chance to bring together the story and make the choices count

You're making assumptions.

Maybe they are completely happy with all the time and money gone into the single player element and are now creating the MP as a seperate thing? What if they actually have two seperate teams of people working on the two different elements? It's been a year and half and they've put the release date back further, so maybe that's to accommodate the creation of MP? We have no idea what they have been doing.

 Well.. I mean they were still working through powers and various levels over the summer, if you follow the tweets

 I accept the point that they may have had a different team on MP, and different funding from EA specifically to do MP, and if that is the case then I don't have an issue. I probably should phrased it as 'you can be quite sure' as admittedly we don't know for certain

[dewayne31]

if it true oh well, it was coming one way or another. personally wont play it.

[Lunatic LK47]

DuckSoup wrote...

So don't. Genius.

In short, multiplayer has more cons than pros. In ME3's case, I'm going on record to blame the inclusion of multiplayer if ME3 is disappointing in any way, shape, or form, just like all the disappointments with the games I mentioned.

[mineralica]

dayvancowboy1 wrote...

 it's my birthday today

Congratulations:wizard:

[marshalleck]

ahahaha

[UnadoptedTrack]

marshalleck wrote...

ahahaha

What the hell is so ****ing funny?

[Lunatic LK47]

TobyHasEyes wrote...

 I accept the point that they may have had a different team on MP, and different funding from EA specifically to do MP, and if that is the case then I don't have an issue. I probably should phrased it as 'you can be quite sure' as admittedly we don't know for certain

Having different teams doesn't guarantee any consistency in quality. Medal of Honor 2010 and Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway already proved that.

Modifié par Lunatic LK47, 10 octobre 2011 - 11:05 .

[ItsPhilsTime]

Lunatic LK47 wrote...

DuckSoup wrote...

As far as I can see you're referencing games that had already exceeded their sell-by-date.

Critical thinking skills. Multiplayer's gimmick is all about "PLAY NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW!" What about those gamers that are on the fence about it? Price drops are not even an option. What are you going to say "**** you for being cautious?"

Hey don't be a dick to Duck, she just saying how she ****ing feels about it, simple. I mean u not buying it, just so u know u will be one out of um 1 million i think thats a good way to put it, do u really think they care that u say ur not going to buy the game... I would say no!!

[Aliffz]

well imho, as long as this multiplayer doesnt DECREASE THE TIME I SPEND TO SAVE THE GALAXY / LIARA then i don't mind. As long as the story is awesome. i don't give a ****

[TobyHasEyes]

Lunatic LK47 wrote...

TobyHasEyes wrote...

 I accept the point that they may have had a different team on MP, and different funding from EA specifically to do MP, and if that is the case then I don't have an issue. I probably should phrased it as 'you can be quite sure' as admittedly we don't know for certain

Having different teams doesn't guarantee any consistency in quality. Medal of Honor 2010 and Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway already proved that.

 Didn't say it guaranteed consistency, but it would mean that effort and investment hadn't necessarily been pulled from the singleplayer to do the multiplayer

[mopotter]

Well, if it's a DLC that I don't have to buy and never see, I won't care that much.

If it's part of the game and it messes up any part of the single player story, action or game play I'll be pissed. But I'll wait till it's official and see how it's going to effect the game before going deciding how angry I should get.

[Lunatic LK47]

DuckSoup wrote...

I can see you're getting frustrated because your limited argument is waivering. You're also starting to sweat a little. *offers towel*

Riight, being glib really helps <_<

Modifié par Lunatic LK47, 10 octobre 2011 - 11:07 .

[UnadoptedTrack]

Lunatic LK47 wrote...

TobyHasEyes wrote...

 I accept the point that they may have had a different team on MP, and different funding from EA specifically to do MP, and if that is the case then I don't have an issue. I probably should phrased it as 'you can be quite sure' as admittedly we don't know for certain

Having different teams doesn't guarantee any consistency in quality. Medal of Honor 2010 and Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway already proved that.

Yeah, but if it's the same team that worked on ME2 that's working on the campaign and a new team is working on the multiplayer, then the SP should be fine the MP is unknown.

[dayvancowboy1]

mineralica wrote...

dayvancowboy1 wrote...

 it's my birthday today

Congratulations:wizard:

thanks

btw, MP shouldn't be a problem if it got it's own team and resources. which it probably did.

[marshalleck]

UnadoptedTrack wrote...

marshalleck wrote...

ahahaha

What the hell is so ****ing funny?

This whole situation. Don't mind me, I'll just be siting over here with a smug, self-satisfied smirk on my face. 

Phaedon will have to update his thread!

[RamirezWolfen]

marshalleck wrote...

UnadoptedTrack wrote...

marshalleck wrote...

ahahaha

What the hell is so ****ing funny?

This whole situation. Don't mind me, I'll just be siting over here with a smug, self-satisfied smirk on my face. 

Phaedon will have to update his thread!

You enjoy other people's misery over optional features?

[marshalleck]

RamirezWolfen wrote...

marshalleck wrote...

UnadoptedTrack wrote...

marshalleck wrote...

ahahaha

What the hell is so ****ing funny?

This whole situation. Don't mind me, I'll just be siting over here with a smug, self-satisfied smirk on my face. 

Phaedon will have to update his thread!

You enjoy other people's misery over optional features?

Schaudenfreude is my midle name. 

Well, no not really, but it should be. 

Also, I like to watch people eat crow.