2368 réponses à ce sujet

[VallenValiant]

The-Person wrote...

VallenValiant wrote...

- It's their baby. They can do whatever they want and you can do nothing about it. Except DON'T BUY IT. And of you don't, someone else will. It's no skin off their nose.
-

But it's skin off MY nose that I don't get to play ME3 the way I wanted, so I LOSE.

Yes, they have the right to abandon the single player gamers after pretending to care about us all this time. They didn't tell us about the decision until now because they wanted to hide it.

No, they don't care if I don't buy it. But I care that I lost a game I want to play. So don't tell me I have no grounds for complaints just because you say I am unimportant.

You understand there is still single player, no one is forcing you to plat with multiplayer. Stop pretending this is not and optional way to play the game.

That's what Blizzard said about Diablo III. Then everything changed. We know what happens when a game developer changes their priorities.

[Uezurii]

The-Person wrote...

Uezurii wrote...

About the art on the cover. Since they dont look like the characters from the game, what if these characters are the multiplayer characters?

The krogan looks like wrex, has the same scar too.

Ah my bad, did not spot the scar.

[aragfore03]

I'm assuming this is coop and not something revolutionary. I'd be very disappointed if it was team deathmatch or capture the flag type games. Drop in\\out coop during the main quest would be great.

[Dave of Canada]

PoliteAssasin wrote...

Is that right? For people like me who have valuable information on our computers, no we won't. 

Battlefield 3 fans don't seem to be bothered.

[slimgrin]

Siansonea II wrote...

I can see it's too much to hope that people will wait until they see how something will be implemented, or have played through the content, before yelling about it. Geez. Common sense tells you that the single-player game isn't going to suddenly become a stripped-down Angry Birds just because they added a multiplayer element. But I guess expecting people to be calm and reasonable about a video game feature announcement is too much to ask.

Sian, as I said before, find me a 30+ hr game with solid multi-player.

Modifié par slimgrin, 10 octobre 2011 - 05:29 .

[MR CHEESENGRITS]

I would rage but i saw this coming months ago.

[robarcool]

El_Chala_Legalizado wrote...

If it's coop...
Who wants to play with me?

Well, I can be your ally.

[DarkDragon777]

How much do you want to bet that Stanley Woo is going to show up in 2 seconds and claim that everyone wanted multiplayer?

[SaddleTrampNC]

Well, grandpa says there's no sense getting angry about anything until all the facts are in. And even then, getting angry would be a waste of energy. He's been right about a lot of things in my life, so I gotta go with him on this too. He got me to playing ME in the first place. And I'm hoping there's no way that BW would end an excellent trilogy in a bad way.

I've never played an MP before. How does that work? My understanding is you're playing on an 'online server'. So there wouldn't be anything I would need to load on my PC? And is there a server designated for new MP players so I wouldn't get bashed and kicked around by the one's that have been playing MP a lot?

[FlyinElk212]

Uezurii wrote...

The-Person wrote...

Uezurii wrote...

About the art on the cover. Since they dont look like the characters from the game, what if these characters are the multiplayer characters?

The krogan looks like wrex, has the same scar too.

Ah my bad, did not spot the scar.

The Krogan is definitely Wrex, which is an odd choice considering the confirmed perma-member squadmates so far...

The Asari, while I THINK is supposed to be Liara, is rather poorly drawn. It's hard to tell, it kinda just looks like an average Asari Commando.

[bobthecrusher]

I No longer want to live on this planet. First Origins only to play the game,and now I hear that it's going to have MP. There's potential, don't get me wrong, but I think that I'd have preferred them jus tletting our game end with some dignity, as opposed to squeezing every drop of lifeblood from it to try and get CoD fans to play.

Bioware, I'm sorry, I've been with you guys for a decade, from Baldur's gate, to DA: Origins you have never failed to produce good quality games that deliver. But there is indeed a startling trend that is slowly but surely taking shape. I don't want MP in Mass Effect (I will probably not play it unless there's some part of the story that is purposely withheld from you unless you finish MP), There's potential in this, so much potential, to either ruin ths game series, or elevate it to the next level.

I digress and don't make much sense, but my point is this: if you mess this game up like you messed up DA2, then you can say goodbye to my business.

[Arcadian Legend]

This thread is going a mile a minute, and I'm not surprised in the slightest. xD

[DaringMoosejaw]

PoliteAssasin wrote...

DaringMoosejaw wrote...

I do find these rebellious noises about Origin pretty amusing though, we all know 99.99% of them are going to put up with it in the end.

Is that right? For people like me who have valuable information on our computers, no we won't. In my case, why would I want to give EA access to source files of the games I work on? I'll most likely play ME1 and 2 on PC, and create custom saves based on those playthroughs for ME3 on xbox. But anyways lets not pull the discussion towards origin in here, this is about multiplayer.

-Polite

When faced with a choice between having to suffer through an inconvenience like disabling Origin or not playing ME3 altogether or violating their ill-defined principles about the 5th amendment, I'll bet on the latter.

Modifié par DaringMoosejaw, 10 octobre 2011 - 05:30 .

[Bekkael]

BatmanPWNS wrote...

RolandX9 wrote...

Snip to the chase:

I012345 wrote...

You can see a positive in playing as a Krogan running around shotgunning other Geth? Not even a little bit?

In co-op? It might be possible. In traditional online matches? Not even a microscopic similarity to a positive, with a million thirteen-year-old snarl-fountains playing those same krogans.

Hate to break it to you but the average age of a gamer in 2011 is 37. So I don't know how your going to find so many 13 year olds.

Wow, I had no idea I was the average age of gamers. That's kinda cool.

[xSTONEYx187x]

John Newton wrote...

Hey DS2 was brilliant and it had multiplayer, why can't this be the same?

I actually had fun with DS 2's MP, but only for a week or two, add to the fact that it took me 12-13 hours to complete Dead Space 1 whereas it took me only 7 and half hours to complete DS 2 and that was on multiple discs! 

Anywho, I actually can't wait to see what the do, as long as the SP is untouched. 

[The-Person]

Rista B wrote...

Frankly this makes no sense at all...Bioware has positioned the entire trilogy as your story that you shape through your decisions (so, okay they haven't turned out that big of a deal yet, but there was always hope that they would in ME 3). Now just ignore that and go jump into the multiplayer map of council races fighting reapers on xyz map.

But that's okay 'cause it's multiplayer, none of that story/character stuff matters!

You understand that the single player and multiplayer are seperate modes. Anyways, everything is pointing to this being co-op not competitive.

[DiegoProgMetal]

RamirezWolfen wrote...

We should totally set up clans.

Take a look at my thread: social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/323/index/8476271

[shepskisaac]

xSTONEYx187x wrote...

Worst kept secret, ever!

No, that was TOR. For some reason, people were in bigger denial about MP in ME3 than with TOR's existance.

[Quinnzel]

If it's competitive Multiplayer, Imma totally name my Clan 'Urdnot'

[Quole]

I just hope they dont touch the SP.

[In Exile]

bobobo878 wrote...
What do you mean "I don't get to play ME3 the way I wanted" as far as we know, the single player is still the way it was before.  Unless you're going to argue that the fact that knowing multiplayer exists ruins the singleplayer experience, you have nothing to cry about.

If there's story based co-op related to the main story that in some way adds new story content, that can wreck the SP. If it's standalone MP, then there's just a concern of feature creep. But that's the same with any feature someone doesn't like. 

[Cyberstrike nTo]

Rista B wrote...

Not excited about this at all and it makes no sense to add multiplayer into the last chapter of a trilogy. Sounds like another excuse to sell overpriced online "subscriptions" and map packs. Will be spending zero time on ME3 multiplayer.

The same here.

[bobthecrusher]

SaddleTrampNC wrote...

Well, grandpa says there's no sense getting angry about anything until all the facts are in. And even then, getting angry would be a waste of energy. He's been right about a lot of things in my life, so I gotta go with him on this too. He got me to playing ME in the first place. And I'm hoping there's no way that BW would end an excellent trilogy in a bad way.

I've never played an MP before. How does that work? My understanding is you're playing on an 'online server'. So there wouldn't be anything I would need to load on my PC? And is there a server designated for new MP players so I wouldn't get bashed and kicked around by the one's that have been playing MP a lot?

(sorry for the double post)

it all depends on how they handle it, but yes, there're normally ways to avoid getting placed head to hed with really good players if you're a noob. Hopefully it won't end up being competitive, but yes, you should be able to find matches with players of equal skill level.

[Jaron Oberyn]

http://www.gameinfor...s-effect-3.aspx

Eurogamer is reporting that the multiplayer will be separate from single player and will include a competitive component.

I don't know about that seeing as the job listing said they need someone to take existing single player systems and make them multiplayer safe. Bioware needs to clarify some of this stuff as soon as possible.

-Polite