Ce sujet est fermé
Calm down, man. You do know it is an entirely optional feature, right?MasterMegatron wrote...
No.
**** you.
**** you up the ass, BioWare.
NOT EVERY GAME NEEDS TO HAVE MULTIPLAYER IN IT. GET THIS THROUGH YOUR THICK GODDAMN SKULLS.
Nobody asked for this. And yet you do it anyway.
Agreed. I hope the Co-Op is not forced on us.solstickan wrote...
Dragoonlordz wrote...
Very valid point since he already stated will be story based co-op, if you can't play unless have friends who also own the game aswell as the on the very same system you use aka PC, 360 or PS3 then thats story content you can't play if requires co-op to play. If it can be played as single player with AI companions like would do in single player game (if he didn't lie about it being story based) then technically it's not so bad because it can also be classed as single player content.
That would be swell if you could play with AI companions. I mean it should be possible right? It's not like they have to solve any puzzles or anything.
Modifié par Rip504, 11 octobre 2011 - 01:06 .
OdanUrr wrote...
gammameggon wrote...
Like I said many times....ME3 already looked like a very linear third person shooter. With energy swords and railgun sequences!!! Is anyone really surprised by multiplayer, since ME3 pretty much looked like a third person shooter, anyways?
Whatever the outcome of the single player....full effort wasn't given to it. Some of the effort was given to multiplayer.
How people cannot comprehend this simplistic logical correlation baffles me.
Your reasoning is based on the unverified premise that a single team worked on both the single player and the multiplayer, rather than have two teams working at the same time. I'll give you that there could be integration problems even so.
NOD-INFORMER37 wrote...
MasterMegatron wrote...
No.
**** you.
**** you up the ass, BioWare.
NOT EVERY GAME NEEDS TO HAVE MULTIPLAYER IN IT. GET THIS THROUGH YOUR THICK GODDAMN SKULLS.
Nobody asked for this. And yet you do it anyway.
I feel your rage man, but dont think this was Bioware's doing, mainly EA's.
EA has a wonderful reputation of f-ing up things. x| (Dead Space 2, C/C4, etc)
gamer_girl wrote...
There have been four major uproars about ME3's new features now - most if not all unnecessary.
-Omni blade: Use of this weapon is optional.
-s/s romances: Pursuing this in your ME3 is also optional.
-Fem Shep face voting: Playing as default Fem Shep is optional.
-multiplayer: Playing with others is also optional.
...Anyone else noticing a trend or is it just me?
Guest_Davian1980_*
Flashflame58 wrote...
Calm down, man. You do know it is an entirely optional feature, right?MasterMegatron wrote...
....
Dragoonlordz wrote...
It would have to include it imho if it's story based like Casey said. Because failure to do so excludes people from the story based content no different than having DRM to stop people playing single player game if not logged in to some spyware. Unless they force you to team up with random people in a LFG style nonsense or PuG if you happen to have not enough friends own both the same game and same system you have it for yourself.
That is assuming they don't add a single player option to that.Davian1980 wrote...
Flashflame58 wrote...
Calm down, man. You do know it is an entirely optional feature, right?MasterMegatron wrote...
....
Except it's supposed to be story based co-op so if you don't play it you're gonna miss out on part of the story.
Abirn wrote...
gamer_girl wrote...
There have been four major uproars about ME3's new features now - most if not all unnecessary.
-Omni blade: Use of this weapon is optional.
-s/s romances: Pursuing this in your ME3 is also optional.
-Fem Shep face voting: Playing as default Fem Shep is optional.
-multiplayer: Playing with others is also optional.
...Anyone else noticing a trend or is it just me?
Except the multiplayer is supposedly story based so saying it's optional is like saying playing the game is optional. Technically correct but thats kind of why we buy the game.
You also miss out part of the story if you don't read comics, books, played ME Galaxy etc.Davian1980 wrote...
Except it's supposed to be story based co-op so if you don't play it you're gonna miss out on part of the story.
RamirezWolfen wrote...
NOD-INFORMER37 wrote...
MasterMegatron wrote...
No.
**** you.
**** you up the ass, BioWare.
NOT EVERY GAME NEEDS TO HAVE MULTIPLAYER IN IT. GET THIS THROUGH YOUR THICK GODDAMN SKULLS.
Nobody asked for this. And yet you do it anyway.
I feel your rage man, but dont think this was Bioware's doing, mainly EA's.
EA has a wonderful reputation of f-ing up things. x| (Dead Space 2, C/C4, etc)
EA was the direct cause of those? How do you know?
Tested-Faythe wrote...
To everyone saying bioware denied that multiplayer in ME3, am I the only one who remembers them adamantly denying that Legion would be a squad member, as well?
Like 300 times?
Retour en haut
