3794 réponses à ce sujet

[Curl of the Burl]

Darkeus wrote...

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Doesn't help the other side either.  They really don;t have concrete evidence by any means.

No really?  And here I was thinking that excluding a source of supporting evidence strengthened a case.

You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

With or without the faq, we know that Multiplayer affects the game one way or another.  Not to hard.

Quite negative? Sites I frequent are hailing this.

EDIT: Why did I quote that?

Haven't been to Gamespot or IGN lately?

lol @thinking Gamespot and IGN are good, at all.

With that attitude, no site is worth anything.

That's not attitude, but simple fact. Though...if you're one to spell ignorant without IGN it may be attitude.

Modifié par Curl of the Burl, 12 octobre 2011 - 01:22 .

[TheGreenAlloy]

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Doesn't help the other side either.  They really don;t have concrete evidence by any means.

No really?  And here I was thinking that excluding a source of supporting evidence strengthened a case.

You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

With or without the faq, we know that Multiplayer affects the game one way or another.  Not to hard.

Yep. So far, we know that it helps boost readiness. If you want it to.

But not to what extent it affects the Single Player.  That is the main point.  It may be intrusive....

Current evidence tips in my favour, but it may turn out to be money-sucking lies in the end, anyway. You say nay, I say yay.

Thread summarized.

No a PR faq released to quell anger is all you have for evidence.  Not very reliable and full of PR. I would say the scales tip in no one's favor.

Hm, yes. It all depends on the validaty of the FAQ, and the regard it is held in.

[gamer_girl]

Darkeus wrote...

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Doesn't help the other side either.  They really don;t have concrete evidence by any means.

No really?  And here I was thinking that excluding a source of supporting evidence strengthened a case.

You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

With or without the faq, we know that Multiplayer affects the game one way or another.  Not to hard.

Quite negative? Sites I frequent are hailing this.

EDIT: Why did I quote that?

Haven't been to Gamespot or IGN lately?

lol @thinking Gamespot and IGN are good, at all.

With that attitude, no site is worth anything.

With your attitude, nothing BioWare says is worth anything.

[shep82]

I grow tired of this. I think I will go back to ME2 and relax now.

[Darkeus]

Il Divo wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

No a PR faq released to quell anger is all you have for evidence.  Not very reliable and full of PR. I would say the scales tip in no one's favor.

The PR release detailed what multi-player would contain. The scale tips in the favor of Bioware saying "X will not affect Y", until further elaboration.

The PR release is just that, PR..

Smoke up rear-end and all of that.  We have no clue what the real truth is but we will ffind out soon if it sucks or actually works.  I am betting for the former.

[Taciter]

Ditto @ shep82

Modifié par Taciter, 12 octobre 2011 - 01:23 .

[JigPig]

My prediction: It falls flat on it's face, like Dead Space 2's multiplayer.

[gamer_girl]

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Doesn't help the other side either.  They really don;t have concrete evidence by any means.

No really?  And here I was thinking that excluding a source of supporting evidence strengthened a case.

You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

With or without the faq, we know that Multiplayer affects the game one way or another.  Not to hard.

Yep. So far, we know that it helps boost readiness. If you want it to.

But not to what extent it affects the Single Player.  That is the main point.  It may be intrusive....

Current evidence tips in my favour, but it may turn out to be money-sucking lies in the end, anyway. You say nay, I say yay.

Thread summarized.

No a PR faq released to quell anger is all you have for evidence.  Not very reliable and full of PR. I would say the scales tip in no one's favor.

Hm, yes. It all depends on the validaty of the FAQ, and the regard it is held in.

While true, you forget that the only thing he has as evidence is a theory that the faq is false. Which do I trust more with regards to a BioWare game? BioWare or some random poster on a web forum?

[TheGreenAlloy]

shep82 wrote...

I grow tired of this. I think I will go back to ME2 and relax now.

Lucky guy. I was in the middle of the Thorian lair, when suddenly, le wild MP discussion, author paper and 3 AM appears.

[Darkeus]

gamer_girl wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Doesn't help the other side either.  They really don;t have concrete evidence by any means.

No really?  And here I was thinking that excluding a source of supporting evidence strengthened a case.

You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

With or without the faq, we know that Multiplayer affects the game one way or another.  Not to hard.

Quite negative? Sites I frequent are hailing this.

EDIT: Why did I quote that?

Haven't been to Gamespot or IGN lately?

lol @thinking Gamespot and IGN are good, at all.

With that attitude, no site is worth anything.

With your attitude, nothing BioWare says is worth anything.

Nothing an EA controlled BioWare says.

Nice try though.....

[TheGreenAlloy]

gamer_girl wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Doesn't help the other side either.  They really don;t have concrete evidence by any means.

No really?  And here I was thinking that excluding a source of supporting evidence strengthened a case.

You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

With or without the faq, we know that Multiplayer affects the game one way or another.  Not to hard.

Yep. So far, we know that it helps boost readiness. If you want it to.

But not to what extent it affects the Single Player.  That is the main point.  It may be intrusive....

Current evidence tips in my favour, but it may turn out to be money-sucking lies in the end, anyway. You say nay, I say yay.

Thread summarized.

No a PR faq released to quell anger is all you have for evidence.  Not very reliable and full of PR. I would say the scales tip in no one's favor.

Hm, yes. It all depends on the validaty of the FAQ, and the regard it is held in.

While true, you forget that the only thing he has as evidence is a theory that the faq is false. Which do I trust more with regards to a BioWare game? BioWare or some random poster on a web forum?

That's our point of view. He discards the FAQ entirely.

[Darkeus]

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Doesn't help the other side either.  They really don;t have concrete evidence by any means.

No really?  And here I was thinking that excluding a source of supporting evidence strengthened a case.

You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

With or without the faq, we know that Multiplayer affects the game one way or another.  Not to hard.

Quite negative? Sites I frequent are hailing this.

EDIT: Why did I quote that?

Haven't been to Gamespot or IGN lately?

lol @thinking Gamespot and IGN are good, at all.

With that attitude, no site is worth anything.

That's not attitude, but simple fact. Though...if you're one to spell ignorant without IGN it may be attitude.

Okay, I will give you IGN,

[Taciter]

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

shep82 wrote...

I grow tired of this. I think I will go back to ME2 and relax now.

Lucky guy. I was in the middle of the Thorian lair, when suddenly, le wild MP discussion, author paper and 3 AM appears.

lol.. join the club!

Shadow Broker DLC actually

Modifié par Taciter, 12 octobre 2011 - 01:25 .

[Kakita Tatsumaru]

Digifi wrote...

shep82 wrote...

Kakita Tatsumaru wrote...

Novate wrote...
I am just wondering what are they gonna do about DLC's , Will DLC's be an extension of the SP , or will it be the extension of the MP. If its the MP then I am very disappointed, because all the fears of the masses will be coming true where the funds and time are spent on MP and not the SP aspects of the Game.

DLC will be extention of the MP, as numerous people here prooved without the slightest doubt that the ME3 single player experience cannot be expanded even with more time and money...

Um they have stated they have dlc plans and why would they focus soley on the MP? Bioware has never done that. The Dlc will likely be split.

I believe Kakita was being sarcastic.

How could I when my fears (and not my hopes) where cast away by such evidences that ME3 cannot be made more complete that it is already?
By such, it's absolutely normal they spent their spare time and money to make Multiplayer, cause that was the only way left to expand the ME3 experience.

[Darkeus]

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

gamer_girl wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Doesn't help the other side either.  They really don;t have concrete evidence by any means.

No really?  And here I was thinking that excluding a source of supporting evidence strengthened a case.

You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

With or without the faq, we know that Multiplayer affects the game one way or another.  Not to hard.

Yep. So far, we know that it helps boost readiness. If you want it to.

But not to what extent it affects the Single Player.  That is the main point.  It may be intrusive....

Current evidence tips in my favour, but it may turn out to be money-sucking lies in the end, anyway. You say nay, I say yay.

Thread summarized.

No a PR faq released to quell anger is all you have for evidence.  Not very reliable and full of PR. I would say the scales tip in no one's favor.

Hm, yes. It all depends on the validaty of the FAQ, and the regard it is held in.

While true, you forget that the only thing he has as evidence is a theory that the faq is false. Which do I trust more with regards to a BioWare game? BioWare or some random poster on a web forum?

That's our point of view. He discards the FAQ entirely.

Not entirely, I just think it is filled with speech to placate the masses and should be taken with a large grain of salt.

Modifié par Darkeus, 12 octobre 2011 - 01:26 .

[felipejiraya]

Holy ****, I've gone to sleep yesterday and Darkeus was whining.

So now I'm back from work and Darkeus is still whining.

Some people really don't know when to stop.

[Curl of the Burl]

Darkeus wrote...

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Doesn't help the other side either.  They really don;t have concrete evidence by any means.

No really?  And here I was thinking that excluding a source of supporting evidence strengthened a case.

You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

With or without the faq, we know that Multiplayer affects the game one way or another.  Not to hard.

Quite negative? Sites I frequent are hailing this.

EDIT: Why did I quote that?

Haven't been to Gamespot or IGN lately?

lol @thinking Gamespot and IGN are good, at all.

With that attitude, no site is worth anything.

That's not attitude, but simple fact. Though...if you're one to spell ignorant without IGN it may be attitude.

Okay, I will give you IGN,

You should give me Gamespot too. They gave Grand Theft Auto IV a 10/10; a perfect score, if you didn't know. When it's common knowledge that Grand Theft Auto IV is complete trash compared to past Grand Theft Auto installments, and a pretty average game period.

Modifié par Curl of the Burl, 12 octobre 2011 - 01:27 .

[Darkeus]

felipejiraya wrote...

Holy ****, I've gone to sleep yesterday and Darkeus was whining.

So now I'm back from work and Darkeus is still whining.

Some people really don't know when to stop.

And, so what.  Not the only one not happy about this...

Please, whatever... 

[Il Divo]

Curl of the Burl wrote...

You should give me Gamespot too. They gave Grand Theft Auto IV a 10/10; a perfect score, if you didn't know. When it's common knowledge that Grand Theft Auto IV is complete trash compared to past Grand Theft Auto installments, and a pretty average game period.

Oh man, this is about to get heavy...

[Taciter]

felipejiraya wrote...

Holy ****, I've gone to sleep yesterday and Darkeus was whining.

So now I'm back from work and Darkeus is still whining.

Some people really don't know when to stop.

He's got impressive stamina.. I'll give him that!

[didymos1120]

Darkeus wrote...


You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

Yes, another obvious fact that didn't need pointing out.  But, just for giggles, what exactly is it that you think I might be wrong about?  Because I don't actually recall claiming anything about the effects of MP on SP other than that they don't preclude achieving the best ending (and yes: I do acknowledge the possibility that that could have been an outright lie. I just don't see any reason to rate that possibility particularly highly without, you know, EVIDENCE).   I DO recall stating that someone else had no evidence for their claims that there would be all sorts of missed SP content due to not using MP, and if it's that you think I might be wrong about, well, feel free to point out where said person actually provided anything other than bare assertion.

[Darkeus]

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Doesn't help the other side either.  They really don;t have concrete evidence by any means.

No really?  And here I was thinking that excluding a source of supporting evidence strengthened a case.

You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

With or without the faq, we know that Multiplayer affects the game one way or another.  Not to hard.

Quite negative? Sites I frequent are hailing this.

EDIT: Why did I quote that?

Haven't been to Gamespot or IGN lately?

lol @thinking Gamespot and IGN are good, at all.

With that attitude, no site is worth anything.

That's not attitude, but simple fact. Though...if you're one to spell ignorant without IGN it may be attitude.

Okay, I will give you IGN,

You should give me Gamespot too. They gave Grand Theft Auto IV a 10/10; a perfect score, if you didn't know. When it's common knowledge that Grand Theft Auto IV is complete trash compared to past Grand Theft Auto installments, and a pretty average game period.

Well, bad review is bad review.  They were not the only ones to overhype that game..  Everybody did.

[meaddict]

IronSabbath88 wrote...

Seriously... this forum makes my head hurt sometimes..

Ditto. So, is there anyway to block users that one does not wish to read? Certain frequent posters in here are giving me a headache.

[Taciter]

Darkeus wrote...

felipejiraya wrote...

Holy ****, I've gone to sleep yesterday and Darkeus was whining.

So now I'm back from work and Darkeus is still whining.

Some people really don't know when to stop.

And, so what.  Not the only one not happy about this...

Please, whatever... 

lol.. Darkeus.. you've probably determined by now that you're preaching to the unconvertable.. let's just call it a day man!

[Dark_Caduceus]

[quote]Darkeus wrote...

[quote]Curl of the Burl wrote...

[quote]Darkeus wrote...

[quote]Curl of the Burl wrote...

[quote]Darkeus wrote...

[quote]Curl of the Burl wrote...

[quote]Darkeus wrote...

[quote]TheGreenAlloy wrote...

[quote]Darkeus wrote...

[quote]didymos1120 wrote...

[quote]Darkeus wrote...

Doesn't help the other side either.  They really don;t have concrete evidence by any means.

[/quote]

No really?  And here I was thinking that excluding a source of supporting evidence strengthened a case.

[/quote]

You might be wrong.  Come on...  Really...

With or without the faq, we know that Multiplayer affects the game one way or another.  Not to hard.

[/quote]
Quite negative? Sites I frequent are hailing this.

EDIT: Why did I quote that?

[/quote]

Haven't been to Gamespot or IGN lately?

[/quote]

lol @thinking Gamespot and IGN are good, at all.
[/quote]

With that attitude, no site is worth anything.

[/quote]

That's not attitude, but simple fact. Though...if you're one to spell ignorant without IGN it may be attitude.[/quote]

Okay, I will give you IGN,

[/quote]

You should give me Gamespot too. They gave Grand Theft Auto IV a 10/10; a perfect score, if you didn't know. When it's common knowledge that Grand Theft Auto IV is complete trash compared to past Grand Theft Auto installments, and a pretty average game period.[/quote]

Well, bad review is bad review.  They were not the only ones to overhype that game..  Everybody did.

[/quote]

Our pyramid will rival the Egyptian's.