3794 réponses à ce sujet

[Biotic Sage]

MGIII wrote...

Biotic Sage wrote...

I really like their vision for integrating multiplayer. It doesn't detract from the single player, but it's still relevant to it should you choose to participate. I'm on board with the content, just not the way Bioware went about announcing it (i.e. they always denied its existent instead of saying "no comment").

They never outright denied multiplayer.

Sigh* I won't argue with you.  If you want to believe that go ahead.

[RamirezWolfen]

Lard wrote...

You're wrong.

How so? It's just my opinion.

[Einz360]

and i need you to recover,
because i cant make it on my own

[Lard]

RamirezWolfen wrote...

How do you know that it's bad,
though? It's not March yet. Let's not be pessimistic about something we
have no knowledge of.

MP is bad. It's that simple.

MGIII wrote...

Lard wrote...

It's incredibly disappointing to a lot of people. And rightfully so.

Don't like it, don't play it. It doesn't affect you. You'll just be missing out on some enjoyable experiences, is all.

Except MP is not enjoyable and it's confirmed it directly affects the single player. It affects me.

RamirezWolfen wrote...

How so? It's just my opinion.

It's still wrong.

Modifié par Lard, 11 octobre 2011 - 05:50 .

[Zanallen]

This has got to be one of the best threads on this forum in a while.

[didymos1120]

LPPrince wrote...

zico291 wrote...

Is MP on the same disk or seperate? Different disk maybe?

I highly HIGHLY doubt its gonna be on a separate disk now.

Probably end up on the 2nd disk.

(almost typo'd that to 32nd disk, whooooa)

Or it's the ME3 equivalent of Zaeed, with just a skeletal infrastructure to hook into on the discs.

[jeweledleah]

Cainne Chapel wrote...

jeweledleah wrote...

I figured out how bioware can redeem this idiocy. sell MP as a separate feature. that way people who don't wish to pay full price for half a game, you know people who have zero interest in MP - can pay 40 bucks and those who do want MP-can pay the full price of 60. becasue that's what it feels like right now. unless you intend to play both features, you are basically paying full price for half a game.

someone made a steak dinner analogy earlier? it fits actually. you order a steak, just a plain steak and they bring you half a steak but with vegetables instead and they make you pay a full price. I don't want vegetables. I didn't order vegetables. I ordered full steak, not half of it.

right now the game is not worth the full price for me. I do not wish to pay for a feature that i will never use, feature so extensive that its quite literally its own campaign that feasibly affects the main one.

Really? Game isn't worth it now because they ADDED a co op component? So getting more than a single player game is now not worth it because they ADDED something?

*Sigh*

Somtimes the B*tching logic on these forums makes my head spin.  Did you even read the FAQ priestly posted with the announcement? By your logic, since I never used Jack, or Tali or Thane in my first ME2 playthrough it was a waste of money since I paid for characters I had no use for right?

......BSN for ya I guess....

no.  by this logic - it would be like bioware forcing you to pay for Kasumi, Shadow broker and arrival and telling you - but you don't have to play them, they are entirely optional.

[JeffZero]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

Motherf*ck.

That is all.


*tears*

I'm genuinely sorry this is causing you such agony, EA. 

[majinstrings]

Nashiktal wrote...

Filament wrote...

majinstrings wrote...

I keep seeing people freaking out about the whole 'Multiplayer can affect the Single Player campaign' issue so let me say this: Multiplayer can not affect the single player campaign if you avoid the multiplayer feature.

Personally, I'm going to try out the multiplayer...but only after I finish the single player campaign...

Like I said, I just hope the singleplayer-only method of getting the optimum solution isn't extremely tedious compared to taking advantage of multiplayer instead.

Yeah I agree. I can't help but feeling multiplayer might be a way to cheat the system. Want your LI to live AND save the galaxy? Play online!

Of course we still dont know how the readiness slider will even work.

Hmmm...that does seem really cheap...but I would totally exploit it if that were the case 

[Iakus]

Cainne Chapel wrote...


Really? Game isn't worth it now because they ADDED a co op component? So getting more than a single player game is now not worth it because they ADDED something?

*Sigh*

Somtimes the B*tching logic on these forums makes my head spin.  Did you even read the FAQ priestly posted with the announcement? By your logic, since I never used Jack, or Tali or Thane in my first ME2 playthrough it was a waste of money since I paid for characters I had no use for right?

......BSN for ya I guess....

So they're giving us two games for the price of one?

I find that highly unlikely.

[ciaweth]

Zanallen wrote...

This has got to be one of the best threads on this forum in a while.

Right?  But I'm bored already.  I kind of wish people would go back to insulting each others' choice of LIs.

[Darkeus]

Soul Cool wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

I don't think everybody believes that in the end it will not have an effect on Single player. I know I don't, this sounds tacked on and EA pushed.

It honestly cannot be any worse than planet scanning or driving the Mako around.

You say that now... If it works out then fine but this sounds tacked on and I don't have a lot of faith that it is going to work.  I feel like it will affect the Single Player negatively and will detract from what is supposed to be the important part of the game, the Single Player story.  

I feel like this is a cash in attempt by EA and it is sad.  This will not bring in new fans....  And it alienates existing fans that have been here from the beginning.

And I liked the Mako, just not the crappy terrain they made you drive on.  The Mako could have been easily fixed and made better.

[didymos1120]

jeweledleah wrote...

 that way people who don't wish to pay full price for half a game....

Whoa there. I think you skipped a few steps.

[MGIII]

Biotic Sage wrote...

MGIII wrote...

Biotic Sage wrote...

I really like their vision for integrating multiplayer. It doesn't detract from the single player, but it's still relevant to it should you choose to participate. I'm on board with the content, just not the way Bioware went about announcing it (i.e. they always denied its existent instead of saying "no comment").

They never outright denied multiplayer.

Sigh* I won't argue with you.  If you want to believe that go ahead.

I believe facts, yes.

[Zanallen]

Terror_K wrote...

They're still making the same game and drawing from the same overall budget. Any money and resources allocated to multiplayer could have gone somewhere else. Simple as that.

Are they? Do you know that for sure? Are you certain that EA didn't add to the budget when they set up this new development team specifically to create multiplayer for ME3? No? Didn't think so.

[JeffZero]

Einz360 wrote...

and i need you to recover,
because i cant make it on my own

[Pythonicus]

MGIII wrote...

Lard wrote...

It's incredibly disappointing to a lot of people. And rightfully so.

Don't like it, don't play it. It doesn't affect you. You'll just be missing out on some enjoyable experiences, is all.

Not true. It does affect me even if I choose to not use it I still paid for it. It is gonna suck or they would sell it as a stand alone game. 

[RamirezWolfen]

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

RamirezWolfen wrote...

How do you know that it's bad, though? It's not March yet. Let's not be pessimistic about something we have no knowledge of.

It isn't that it's bad or good multiplayer; it's that it's multiplayer.

D*mmit, Mass Effect introduced me to RPGs, to world of a (mostly) single player genre!

F*ck, I really do feel like crying.

Bioware has made other games that have multiplayer. Like NWN, BG2, and Shattered Steel. And those worked.

And those except Shattered Steel were RPGs.

[Lord Jaric]

Lard wrote...

RamirezWolfen wrote...

How do you know that it's bad,
though? It's not March yet. Let's not be pessimistic about something we
have no knowledge of.

MP is bad. It's that simple Thats my opinion 

fixed, just because you think something is bad doesn't many everyone agrees with you.

[Lard]

Lord Jaric wrote...

Lard wrote...

RamirezWolfen wrote...

How do you know that it's bad,
though? It's not March yet. Let's not be pessimistic about something we
have no knowledge of.

MP is bad. It's that simple Thats my opinion 

fixed, just because you think something is bad doesn't many everyone agrees with you.

Yes, but they're wrong.

[Zanallen]

ciaweth wrote...

Right?  But I'm bored already.  I kind of wish people would go back to insulting each others' choice of LIs.

Just wait until the "MP Caused [Insert Favorite Character Here] To Be Cut As A Squadmember For ME3" threads.