3794 réponses à ce sujet

[TheBlackBaron]

didymos1120 wrote...

Holy crap. I just realized that I haven't seen one "Ah yes, X" post on this thread.

Ah yes, making "Ah yes, X" posts in this thread. We have dismissed those claims. 

Modifié par TheBlackBaron, 11 octobre 2011 - 06:35 .

[MGIII]

didymos1120 wrote...

Holy crap. I just realized that I haven't seen one "Ah yes, X" post on this thread.

At first I was going to say that croc in your avatar was adorable, but then I looked closer, and became afraid...

[jbg927]

ok I'll bite "Ah yes, multiplayer! We have un-dismissed those claims"

[Lord Jaric]

didymos1120 wrote...

Holy crap. I just realized that I haven't seen one "Ah yes, X" post on this thread.

I never really found those jokes funny anyways, so I didn't take any notice through the flame war.

jbg927 wrote...

ok I'll bite "Ah yes, multiplayer! We have un-dismissed those claims"

damn you

Modifié par Lord Jaric, 11 octobre 2011 - 06:36 .

[NitrAce]

Just one question, what about the different decisions each player has made in the previous games? How would these technically collide in multiplayer? Or is the influence just omnidirectional and single player has no affect on multi player just vice versa? If not then what if two players have different choices, say one saved the Rachni the other didn't? How does the game handle such a situation? Do our games function individually, as in the person without the Rachni doesn't see them in his game and the other one does? If so then how does it make sense in multiplayer for each person in your squad to be playing his own game rather than a cooperative game? If multiplayer is just a completely different section with all races unlocked and following the paragon route then how will it make sense for someone who got rid of the Rachni and they appear in multi for them but not in their single player game?

Okay that's not just one question but you know for a shocker like this I think I'm justified in wanting some clarity so I can be just as hyped for the game as I have been since last years VGA's.

[Lard]

mrcrusty wrote...

sTrYkZ1LLa wrote...

I hope they add a lot of multiplayer achievements/trophies!!

ADLegend21 wrote...

SilentNukee wrote...

I will make love to my copy of ME3 as soon as I get it.

That should be one of the achievements.

His penis must be incredibly small to fit in the hole.

[didymos1120]

TheBlackBaron wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Holy crap. I just realized that I haven't seen one "Ah yes, X" post on this thread.

Ah yes, making "Ah yes, X" posts in this thread. We have dismissed those claims. 

You son of a....<_<

[ciaweth]

Lard wrote...

MGIII wrote...

No, they played it right. They eased it in really well.

Refusing to comment and misleading people into thinking it would be a single player game is not "easing people int it".

You're joking, right?  "We have no comment" universally translates as "Yes, what you've surmised is mostly correct, but we're not going to talk about it until later." 

It's not misleading to say "no comment."  It's not even misleading to say "We have no plans for that at this time."  It's misleading to say, "No, there will not be any multiplayer comment."

There's plenty wrong with how the information got out, but the thing you are wailing about is not part of it.

[Soul Cool]

didymos1120 wrote...

Holy crap. I just realized that I haven't seen one "Ah yes, X" post on this thread.

"Ah, yes, sanity. The cohesive force of society and human existence in general. We have dismissed that claim."

[Robuthad]

Ahhh yes, co-op effecting the quality of the single player campaign. We've dismissed these claims.

[Fixers0]

So now it's openly confirmed that the Bioware staff lied to by repeatitly saying that Mass Effect is a singelplayer experiance on these boards?

I personal have no fundamental problems with Multiplayer but these kinds of jokes severly damage the credibilty of Bioware staff.

[MGIII]

jeweledleah wrote...

MGIII wrote...

jeweledleah wrote...

AntiChri5 wrote...

btw - ability to play multiplayer missions as solo with henchmen is an acceptable compromise. becasue as it stands right now? this is basically content that is unacessible to me. not optional. unacessible. and yet if I wanted to play a main game, I have to pay for it.

If that is fine, then why is the option to have some of your human friends join in not?

becasue Cris, dear - its not an option.  if I can play alone - i could care less if you play with others.  but I cannot play alone.  I have to play with other people or not play at all. but still pay for it. 

at least I'm goddamn trying to find a compromice here that would work you know for all involved.  discounted game that comes with single player only.  or multiplayer being available as a solo option.  something that doesn't just lock out content while still requiring full price.

make no mistake about it.  I still feel that multiplayer HAS taken away from single player development.

Just play the single player. Quit with the strawman and ad hoc ergo propter hoc.

you are all heart and soul of compromice, arent' you.<_<  I don't know about you, but you know not living in my parent's basement and having to actualy budget - I cannot afford to pay for content that I will never use.  60 dollars is a lot of money.  80 dollars for collector's edition even more so. 

And now, personal insults. You antimultiplayers are so charming.

Modifié par MGIII, 11 octobre 2011 - 06:37 .

[didymos1120]

NitrAce wrote...

Just one question, what about the different decisions each player has made in the previous games? How would these technically collide in multiplayer? Or is the influence just omnidirectional and single player has no affect on multi player just vice versa?

The OP said our ME1 and ME2 saves don't influence the co-op.

[Darkeus]

Robuthad wrote...

Ahhh yes, co-op effecting the quality of the single player campaign. We've dismissed these claims.

No, no we haven't.  Until we have more information than a PR faq thrown out to appease the pissed-off masses then no we have not dismissed anything.

[TheBlackBaron]

didymos1120 wrote...

TheBlackBaron wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Holy crap. I just realized that I haven't seen one "Ah yes, X" post on this thread.

Ah yes, making "Ah yes, X" posts in this thread. We have dismissed those claims. 

You son of a....<_<

I thought it was good. 

[MGIII]

NitrAce wrote...

Just one question, what about the different decisions each player has made in the previous games? How would these technically collide in multiplayer? Or is the influence just omnidirectional and single player has no affect on multi player just vice versa? If not then what if two players have different choices, say one saved the Rachni the other didn't? How does the game handle such a situation? Do our games function individually, as in the person without the Rachni doesn't see them in his game and the other one does? If so then how does it make sense in multiplayer for each person in your squad to be playing his own game rather than a cooperative game? If multiplayer is just a completely different section with all races unlocked and following the paragon route then how will it make sense for someone who got rid of the Rachni and they appear in multi for them but not in their single player game?

Okay that's not just one question but you know for a shocker like this I think I'm justified in wanting some clarity so I can be just as hyped for the game as I have been since last years VGA's.

Read the FAQ in the original post, that should set you straight.

[didymos1120]

Robuthad wrote...

Ahhh yes, co-op effecting the quality of the single player campaign. We've dismissed these claims.

Damn it.  What have I done?

[Lard]

MGIII wrote...

And now, personal insults. You antimultiplayers are so charming.

And you MP dudebro jocks are so condescending.

MGIII wrote...

Read the FAQ in the original post, that should set you straight.

Yes, don't forget the part where it says the MP directly affects the SP.

Modifié par Lard, 11 octobre 2011 - 06:41 .

[Lord Jaric]

Fixers0 wrote...

So now it's openly confirmed that the Bioware staff lied to by repeatitly saying that Mass Effect is a singelplayer experiance on these boards?

I personal have no fundamental problems with Multiplayer but these kinds of jokes severly damage the credibilty of Bioware staff.

beats head into computer, do should I even have to repeat what has already been said about this.

Modifié par Lord Jaric, 11 octobre 2011 - 06:41 .

[ciaweth]

didymos1120 wrote...

Robuthad wrote...

Ahhh yes, co-op effecting the quality of the single player campaign. We've dismissed these claims.

Damn it.  What have I done?

You've brought levity to a thread where there is altogether too much runny mascara on all sides of the debate.  So thanks for that!

[didymos1120]

TheBlackBaron wrote...

I thought it was good. 

We have nothing to announce regarding whether it was good or not at this time.

[Soul Cool]

didymos1120 wrote...

Robuthad wrote...

Ahhh yes, co-op effecting the quality of the single player campaign. We've dismissed these claims.

Damn it.  What have I done?

You have unleashed the beast. It is a lumbering, plodding thing. Dedicated to the creation of humor and fun in a SERIOUS thread. You have done a bad thing, and you should feel bad for it.

Modifié par Soul Cool, 11 octobre 2011 - 06:41 .

[Lord Jaric]

didymos1120 wrote...

Robuthad wrote...

Ahhh yes, co-op effecting the quality of the single player campaign. We've dismissed these claims.

Damn it.  What have I done?

you should of kept you damn mouth shut

[Robuthad]

Haha didymos I'm just foolin' around! Could it affect it? Possibly.
Will it affect it? Hopefully not

[NOD-INFORMER37]

Hey guys when do they release more info of this this anyways? Was it the day after tommorow or the day after the day after tommorow? xP