Mesina2 wrote...
Darth Vengeant wrote...
Mesina2 wrote...
@Darth Vengeant don't give me this completionist garbage.
If you really care to get 100%, you'll get friends or deal with some random people for a Co-Op achievements.
To YOU it is garbage, to others it is not. That is my point. Making it fair for EVERYONE. Some people enojy it, you obviously dont care. But, why ruin others enjoyment just because YOU dont care? See my point?
So, your saying I should be forced to socialize with people I do not want to deal with inorder to earn the 100% in a game? I think not. News flash. Not everyone is Mr Social. Not everyone enjoys having to deal with others all the time. Some people, which this may suprise you, are quite anti-social. It is called being an Introvert. It does't mean there is something wrong with us either. Introverts are very creative and artistic. We enjoy the quite of solitude and doing things on our own. We are all different people.
What kinda bull is this?
Being anti-social is not a good thing for anyone.
Besides, you being here replying to me is a social activity.
If you can bother to reply to me and so with the other I think you can easly do a Co-Op with other people as well.
Besides, Bioware never did any insane achievement like Ubisoft and games like Mass Effect don't have hard to do achievements.
Ironically, your veiwpoint on this is quite anti-social. Rather than be open-minded, you've trying to force your opinion and tastes/preferences down his throat while he's complaining about his expectations for having multiplayer achievements forced down his throat if he wants to 100% the game.
"Deal with it" is not inclusive or open language. It does not come from a position of empathy and it infers a superiority complex. It's aggressive and confrontational, coming from a position where you're already convinced that you're right and he's wrong. It's the kind of behavior that one might not want to put up with in a social setting when trying to enjoy a forum or a game.
I've played a variety of games w/ multiplayer achievements and they are often much more difficult for some to obtain and not others, not due to a skill-level requirement, but due to the limitations of and sometimes nature of multiplayer.
For some people, those imaginary points next to their name are a point of pride and a measure of completion. They may not have a tangible or concrete facet to them, but they can still instill a sense of pride and accomplishment. if you don't understand that or don't agree with that mindset, that's fine. That's your perogative. But I don't think it makes sense to talk down to or trash his position just because you disagree with it. I get his perspective and i get yours, but I also see that your point is the more confrontational.
I'm all for conflict. I play Halo. But since there's really no information about what exactly the achievements are, how they work and how MP factors in, I think his concerns are warranted while you're coming from a position that assumes facts not in evidence. His also makes assumptions but he's not telling anyone to "deal with it."
Modifié par ODST 5723, 11 octobre 2011 - 08:17 .