2261 réponses à ce sujet

[1136342t54_]

Commodore Q wrote...

is it xbox only? O_o

No. Its for all platforms.

[zico291]

Il Divo wrote...

zico291 wrote...

Can someone please answer this, I have posted on twitter and I have not got a response.

From what I have heard co-op ONLY helps raise the readiness bar to the max which can also be achieved in singleplayer and does not give alternative endings dialog, cinematics etc to the singleplayer?

So far, that's all they've indicated that co-op will do and that it is possible to achieve the best ending strictly through single-player. Far as we know, co-op does not lead to exclusive single player content...yet.

If that is all co-op will do, then I really don't see a problem with it.

[1136342t54_]

Dark_Caduceus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...


You and Killjoy post that quote multiple times as some sort of proof that SP will not give the best possible ending.

Ugh. You're actually such a dense moron.

There's no need for name-calling, it's just a game at the end of the day.

Awesome edit there /sarcasm

[Dragoonlordz]

I asked in other thread but will also ask in this one since multiple threads discussing same thing not sure which will give me the answer.

The war asset's are only a currency like number tracked through single player which can reach number high enough to do everything in single player alone . The co-op war asset's number is added to single player war asset number if choose to play co-op but if choose not to play co-op and those two numbers do not get added together. The actual co-op does not in [any] way infringe on single player at all which includes cinematics, dialogue or missions etc through the entirity of the single player game other than this "war asset" number? Once reach point in game that requires spending of these assets, players in single player get given choice of how to spend or is it done without consent?

Is this all correct and what is the answer to last question.

[Il Divo]

zico291 wrote...

Il Divo wrote...

zico291 wrote...

Can someone please answer this, I have posted on twitter and I have not got a response.

From what I have heard co-op ONLY helps raise the readiness bar to the max which can also be achieved in singleplayer and does not give alternative endings dialog, cinematics etc to the singleplayer?

So far, that's all they've indicated that co-op will do and that it is possible to achieve the best ending strictly through single-player. Far as we know, co-op does not lead to exclusive single player content...yet.

If that is all co-op will do, then I really don't see a problem with it.

Yeah, I'm definitely hoping it stays that way.

[Major Alenko]

1136342t54 wrote...

Commodore Q wrote...

is it xbox only? O_o

No. Its for all platforms.

why does he only talk about xbox live though?

[mcneil_1]

Curunen wrote...

The PLC wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

Including Elcor and Hanar?

...Never say never...

THERE'S STILL HOPE WE CAN PLAY AS HANAR YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hanar announced as DLC. Only 4000 ms-points

Would be an instant buy for me.

Same here but only if it was with biopoints (Then I could have my Hanar Infiltrator)

[zico291]

Il Divo wrote...

zico291 wrote...

Il Divo wrote...

zico291 wrote...

Can someone please answer this, I have posted on twitter and I have not got a response.

From what I have heard co-op ONLY helps raise the readiness bar to the max which can also be achieved in singleplayer and does not give alternative endings dialog, cinematics etc to the singleplayer?

So far, that's all they've indicated that co-op will do and that it is possible to achieve the best ending strictly through single-player. Far as we know, co-op does not lead to exclusive single player content...yet.

If that is all co-op will do, then I really don't see a problem with it.

Yeah, I'm definitely hoping it stays that way.

Yeah, same I will be fine with it to.

[1136342t54_]

Commodore Q wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

Commodore Q wrote...

is it xbox only? O_o

No. Its for all platforms.

why does he only talk about xbox live though?

I would assume because more people are worried about having to pay money to actually be able to play the MP mode when you can actually play it solo.

[Zhijn]

I'll just throw this in. Whats the news on Origin and ME3.

Had hoped it would be in your FAQ considering its multiplayer. =/

Off i go, whoosh!.

[wicked117]

Dark_Caduceus wrote...

 it's just a game at the end of the day.

It is but the way people react on here you would think it was the end of the world. Seriously one can throw all the quotes and assumtions around that they want, the truth is we wont know 100% for sure what its going to be like til it's actually in our consol and we are playing it. 

[Lard]

1136342t54 wrote...

Edit: Seriously your debating practice is so childish. It is basically if you like MP then your big stupid head!

You're a big stupid head. Not your.

[Jonttu1]

jake112296 wrote...

I think it's just story missions with your friends the, 2 stories will probably intertwine, because that is the shuttle the little boy was in at 1:17. Maybe they're some specters, or an Alliance military group of some sort

Did you listen to what the video said at all?

[1136342t54_]

Lard wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

Edit: Seriously your debating practice is so childish. It is basically if you like MP then your big stupid head!

You're a big stupid head. Not your.

I'm guessing you didn't get that was the part of me calling you childish. If you were acting like a child my minor hyperbole of your point would include a small amount of grammatical error showing how much of a child you are acting like.

Hell now you have gotten to the point where your only argument is attempting to point a grammar mistake.

I am done with you now.

Modifié par 1136342t54 , 12 octobre 2011 - 08:00 .

[Il Divo]

The PLC wrote...

So all this talk about MP got me thinking... what's the deal with airline food?

I'm not a fan, especially when they try to serve me bloody vegetable lasagna, of all things.

Modifié par Il Divo, 12 octobre 2011 - 07:57 .

[Lard]

1136342t54 wrote...
I am done with you know.

You mean now.

Jonttu1 wrote...
Did you listen to what the video said at all?

Why would he when it's just propoganda?

Modifié par Lard, 12 octobre 2011 - 07:58 .

[Meglivorn]

BAD news

I have nothing against the multiplayer fun, and getting together and have a game. So my problem is not that.
But to make it count in the single player game is awful. This actually mean that I MUST get 3 people to beat the multi content if I want  that the adventure and epic of my Shepard end the best way.
Great.
I usually don't care about game design, and mechanics, I love ME2 as it is, but this just made me sad. Technically this just determined my gameplay experience as it is (since I do know taht I won't get 3 friends to play, even if I have more friends who like the game itself).
Thanks really. I never understood why some wants multi in this specific, definitely singleplayer game. Why can't they want some different game, after the trilogy, or as a standalone DLC. 
I hope they happy now, at least.

[Il Divo]

I saw that coming a mile away.

[Chaos-fusion]

Zhijn wrote...

I'll just throw this in. Whats the news on Origin and ME3.

Had hoped it would be in your FAQ considering its multiplayer. =/

Off i go, whoosh!.

That is the one thing that would stop me buying it so far. I'm guessing we won't hear on that until alot closer to release though.

Would be a shame to have to miss the final game over that, but *shrug*.

[Curl of the Burl]

Jonttu1 wrote...

jake112296 wrote...

I think it's just story missions with your friends the, 2 stories will probably intertwine, because that is the shuttle the little boy was in at 1:17. Maybe they're some specters, or an Alliance military group of some sort

Did you listen to what the video said at all?

It would seem most people on this forum don't listen, or have the ability to read, period.

Modifié par Curl of the Burl, 12 octobre 2011 - 08:00 .

[didymos1120]

Lard wrote...

Prove to me that that there are more people who want MP in Mass Effect than those who want it to remain SP, and I won't make another post on here. Too bad you can't, because it's not the case.

Why would I want to do that?  It's not a claim I've ever made, nor will I ever make it. 

[Lard]

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Jonttu1 wrote...

jake112296 wrote...

I think it's just story missions with your friends the, 2 stories will probably intertwine, because that is the shuttle the little boy was in at 1:17. Maybe they're some specters, or an Alliance military group of some sort

Did you listen to what the video said at all?

It would seem most people on this forum don't listen, or have the ability to read, period.

Particularly the ones that don't think the MP will affect the SP.

[Killjoy Cutter]

addiction21 wrote...

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

In the video, Casey Hudson says (at ~2:15) regarding assets and such, "... fighting to control those on the multiplayer side, and the better you do, the more you control, the better your single player ending will be."

Amusing how you are conveintly leaving the rest out. What does he explain imediatly after that?

I'm reposting a quote that others have posted as well. 

[didymos1120]

Dark_Caduceus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...


You and Killjoy post that quote multiple times as some sort of proof that SP will not give the best possible ending.

Ugh. You're actually such a dense moron.

There's no need for name-calling, it's just a game at the end of the day.

And there's another one DC.  Ready to stop altering people's posts yet?