2261 réponses à ce sujet

[whitey2525]

how can this coop mode be enabled anyway, this transition sounds odd to me. Will it be a menu option to enter on the Main Menu Screen and a multiplayer lobby.
and
whose SP story is the multiplayer missions affecting in the party, the host's story? i don't want to play the same mission 4 times for my friends

just a thought
even after you kill the reapers and the fight is over and you are just flying around scanning planets, will you be able to continue with the coop mode in past missions or play in traning missions, kinda like Pinnacle Station from ME1?

this multiplayer sounds fun and im excited for it, but i just don't get how they are gonna make this work while making sense in the story.

[Killjoy Cutter]

didymos1120 wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

You and Killjoy post that quote multiple times as some sort of proof that SP will not give the best possible ending.

It's also rather dishonest to keep deliberately ignoring the context.  There's a term for that: quote-mining. 

So what is the context?  

[Someone With Mass]

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Jonttu1 wrote...

jake112296 wrote...

I think it's just story missions with your friends the, 2 stories will probably intertwine, because that is the shuttle the little boy was in at 1:17. Maybe they're some specters, or an Alliance military group of some sort

Did you listen to what the video said at all?

It would seem most people on this forum don't listen, or have the ability to read, period.

Sad, but true.

[Killjoy Cutter]

Dark_Caduceus wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

You and Killjoy post that quote multiple times as some sort of proof that SP will not give the best possible ending.

Ugh. You're actually such a dense moron.

There's no need for name-calling, it's just a game at the end of the day.

You know, I don't care what side you're on, that's pathetic. 

I've seen you pull this trick multiple times, where you completely change what someone said and then respond as if scolding them for whatever you put in place of their actual words. 

Knock it the hell off.  Reported. 

(And I'm sure you'll misquote me in the same pathetic way now too.)

[Doug4130]

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

You and Killjoy post that quote multiple times as some sort of proof that SP will not give the best possible ending.

It's also rather dishonest to keep deliberately ignoring the context.  There's a term for that: quote-mining. 

So what is the context?  

that right after he says what you're quoting, he says that the complete ending is still achieveable by single player alone

[Lard]

whitey2525 wrote...
this multiplayer sounds fun and im excited for it, but i just don't get how they are gonna make this work while making sense in the story.

They can't.

Look at:

MGS4
Bioshock 2
Uncharted 2
Dead Space 2
GTA 4

All of those games were previously single player that had MP modes added to them that contributed nothing to the game. MP mode in those games sucked. It happens time after time after time. It's a simple cash grab and adds nothing. MP just does not belong.

Modifié par Lard, 12 octobre 2011 - 08:12 .

[didymos1120]

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

You and Killjoy post that quote multiple times as some sort of proof that SP will not give the best possible ending.

It's also rather dishonest to keep deliberately ignoring the context.  There's a term for that: quote-mining. 

So what is the context?  

You've been given the context I don't know how many times now by I don't know how many different people.  I'm not doing it yet again because you'll just say it doesn't matter and then repeat the same behavior.

[Someone With Mass]

Lard wrote...

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Jonttu1 wrote...

jake112296 wrote...

I think it's just story missions with your friends the, 2 stories will probably intertwine, because that is the shuttle the little boy was in at 1:17. Maybe they're some specters, or an Alliance military group of some sort

Did you listen to what the video said at all?

It would seem most people on this forum don't listen, or have the ability to read, period.

Particularly the ones that don't think the MP will affect the SP.

Aw, that's cute. He's in denial.

Butts gonna hurt.

[Killjoy Cutter]

Curl of the Burl wrote...

Jonttu1 wrote...

jake112296 wrote...

I think it's just story missions with your friends the, 2 stories will probably intertwine, because that is the shuttle the little boy was in at 1:17. Maybe they're some specters, or an Alliance military group of some sort

Did you listen to what the video said at all?

It would seem most people on this forum don't listen, or have the ability to read, period.

It would seem that several people on the forum can't be bothered form a cogent and coherent agrument, and must instead fall back on repeating the same tired, pathetic, boxed insults in the direction of anyone who doesn't agree with them. 

[Lard]

Someone With Mass wrote...

Aw, that's cute. He's in denial.

Butts gonna hurt.

Yours will when you realise paying for this game translates into you getting (metaphorically) anally raped.

[Ghost-621]

shinobi602 wrote...

*sigh*

Every time Casey says ME3 is the best place to start, I die a little more inside.

Prepare to die completely on the inside and outside when you find out that NONE of your choices matter, because all it's actually about is filling up a meter in the corner of your screen.

This reminds me of how disappointed I was at the ending of Fable 3...but 50 times worse.

[Doug4130]

whitey2525 wrote...

this multiplayer sounds fun and im excited for it, but i just don't get how they are gonna make this work while making sense in the story.

They fit it in the story because Shep isn't there, the story behind it is you are a 4 person squad under the command of Admiral Hackett and you're fighting for resources/whatever on various planets in the galaxy

[1136342t54_]

Ghost-621 wrote...

shinobi602 wrote...

*sigh*

Every time Casey says ME3 is the best place to start, I die a little more inside.

Prepare to die completely on the inside and outside when you find out that NONE of your choices matter, because all it's actually about is filling up a meter in the corner of your screen.

This reminds me of how disappointed I was at the ending of Fable 3...but 50 times worse.

It was specified in another thread that the Galactic Readiness is but one part of it. No matter how high your readiness bar is it still depends on what choices you make.

Edit: Hear is the post https://twitter.com/...916777854996480

Modifié par 1136342t54 , 12 octobre 2011 - 08:15 .

[whitey2525]

Lard wrote...

whitey2525 wrote...
this multiplayer sounds fun and im excited for it, but i just don't get how they are gonna make this work while making sense in the story.

They can't.
Look at:
MGS4
Bioshock 2
Uncharted 2
Dead Space 2
GTA 4
All of those games were previously single player that had MP modes added to them that contributed nothing to the game. MP mode in those games sucked. It happens time after time after time. It's a simple cash grab and adds nothing. MP just does not belong.

Well maybe they can just add a pinnacle station coop mode with dlc maps and missions and other stuff like that, i wouldn't mind that at all.

[Killjoy Cutter]

didymos1120 wrote...

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

You and Killjoy post that quote multiple times as some sort of proof that SP will not give the best possible ending.

It's also rather dishonest to keep deliberately ignoring the context.  There's a term for that: quote-mining. 

So what is the context?  

You've been given the context I don't know how many times now by I don't know how many different people.  I'm not doing it yet again because you'll just say it doesn't matter and then repeat the same behavior.

You mean the context of the other devs statements, or the context of the rest of Hudson's statement? 

Maybe it was silly of me, but I assumed that the person who originally posted it wouldn't be intellectually dishonest enough to post it in that form if the surrounding context of the quote significantly alters the meaning of Hudson's statement.  As it was originally posted here, the question remains, "better" than what?  IF Hudson's full statement makes that clear, fine. 

Modifié par Killjoy Cutter, 12 octobre 2011 - 08:17 .

[didymos1120]

Lard wrote...

They can't.

Look at:

MGS4

Whoa. Whoa. Whoa.  You honestly think MGO was to blame for MGS4's story issues?  

[subby19]

Doug4130 wrote...

whitey2525 wrote...

this multiplayer sounds fun and im excited for it, but i just don't get how they are gonna make this work while making sense in the story.

They fit it in the story because Shep isn't there, the story behind it is you are a 4 person squad under the command of Admiral Hackett and you're fighting for resources/whatever on various planets in the galaxy

Krogan, Salarian, Turian, Asari, and Drell under the command of an Alliance officer? That doesn't seem right. Is that really what the article said?

[Someone With Mass]

Lard wrote...

Yours will when you realise paying for this game translates into you getting (metaphorically) anally raped.

It does? I thought it was just a game with some optional multiplayer mode that will have absolutely no impact on the singleplayer unless I want it to.

Well, good thing I paid for the CE about...half a year ago, then.

[1136342t54_]

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

You and Killjoy post that quote multiple times as some sort of proof that SP will not give the best possible ending.

It's also rather dishonest to keep deliberately ignoring the context.  There's a term for that: quote-mining. 

So what is the context?  

You've been given the context I don't know how many times now by I don't know how many different people.  I'm not doing it yet again because you'll just say it doesn't matter and then repeat the same behavior.

You mean the context of the other devs statements, or the context of the rest of Hudson's statement? 

Maybe it was silly of me, but I assumed that the person who originally posted it wouldn't be intellectually dishonest enough to post it in that form if the surrounding context of the quote significantly alters the meaning of Hudson's statement.  As it was originally posted here, the question remains, "better" than what?  IF Hudson's full statement makes that clear, fine. 

It was silly. When you constantly put up a quote as evidence and have others call you out on it it would be best to actually find the source of that quote (the video) then confirm if it was out of context or not.

[THX-1137]

So it looks pretty good.

Though, what does "You can reach the highest levels of success in the single player experience alone, but Galaxy at War gives you alternative ways to get there" really mean? Will by playing some segments in multiplayer cut them out of single player or make a mission easier? I'm thinking that in single player you might be coordinating with ground forces which could be carried out through multiplayer. Interesting...

[Lard]

didymos1120 wrote...

Lard wrote...

They can't.

Look at:

MGS4

Whoa. Whoa. Whoa.  You honestly think MGO was to blame for MGS4's story issues?  

I never said that. I said it contributed nothing to the single player game. And it didn't.

[Doug4130]

subby19 wrote...

Doug4130 wrote...

whitey2525 wrote...

this multiplayer sounds fun and im excited for it, but i just don't get how they are gonna make this work while making sense in the story.

They fit it in the story because Shep isn't there, the story behind it is you are a 4 person squad under the command of Admiral Hackett and you're fighting for resources/whatever on various planets in the galaxy

Krogan, Salarian, Turian, Asari, and Drell under the command of an Alliance officer? That doesn't seem right. Is that really what the article said?

Yes, it was in the leaked OXM article I do believe.  I guess what with the fate of the galaxy at stake everyone put aside their differences

[didymos1120]

Lard wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Aw, that's cute. He's in denial.

Butts gonna hurt.

Yours will when you realise paying for this game translates into you getting (metaphorically) anally raped.

Well, some of us have a bit more perspective about these things and don't get quite so melodramatic when we have the rather minor misfortune (in the grand scheme of things) of buying a bad video game.

[Pallid]

Ghost-621 wrote...
This reminds me of how disappointed I was at the ending of Fable 3...but 50 times worse.

Please don't remind me of the Fable 3 ending, it hurts, it huuuurts.

[Killjoy Cutter]

1136342t54 wrote...

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

So what is the context?  

You've been given the context I don't know how many times now by I don't know how many different people.  I'm not doing it yet again because you'll just say it doesn't matter and then repeat the same behavior.

You mean the context of the other devs statements, or the context of the rest of Hudson's statement? 

Maybe it was silly of me, but I assumed that the person who originally posted it wouldn't be intellectually dishonest enough to post it in that form if the surrounding context of the quote significantly alters the meaning of Hudson's statement.  As it was originally posted here, the question remains, "better" than what?  IF Hudson's full statement makes that clear, fine. 

It was silly. When you constantly put up a quote as evidence and have others call you out on it it would be best to actually find the source of that quote (the video) then confirm if it was out of context or not.

The only "calling out" was people calling me illiterate and a fanboy and other such boxed insults because of how I was reading the posted statement.  If you or they were so sure that the Hudson statement was being taken completely out of context, you could have said that.  But unless I missed it in the storm of stupid insult posts, no one did. 

(And no, "but some other dev said!" is not the context we're talking about here.)

Modifié par Killjoy Cutter, 12 octobre 2011 - 08:23 .