2261 réponses à ce sujet

[TheGreenAlloy]

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...
Not sure about the name calling since I never read those posts only read the ones in which people were attempting to argue that quote without resorting to name calling.

Also Casey hudson in the same video directly after that quote says "If you wanna do a really complete single player playthrough. Then you can absolutely get to the highest level of success in the endgame."

Here's what really confuses me:  why is one dev quote being treated as the irrefutable Gospel Of The Worst-Case Scenario by Killjoy, and yet another quote from that very same person that soundly contradicts his interpretation,  not to mention those from other devs, automatically suspect and not to be entered into evidence? 

It's not that any one is being taken as Gospel Truth, it's that as a whole all the posted dev quotes and comments look like a company trying to have it both ways. 

"MP is great and will really enhance your SP experience!"
"You'll never notice a difference in your SP experience if you don't touch the MP!" 

Both are correct, but 1# is optional.

[Someone With Mass]

Some games have had the singleplayer make some change in the multiplayer. Why can't it be optional to have it the other way around?

[subby19]

Doug4130 wrote...

subby19 wrote...

Doug4130 wrote...

whitey2525 wrote...

this multiplayer sounds fun and im excited for it, but i just don't get how they are gonna make this work while making sense in the story.

They fit it in the story because Shep isn't there, the story behind it is you are a 4 person squad under the command of Admiral Hackett and you're fighting for resources/whatever on various planets in the galaxy

Krogan, Salarian, Turian, Asari, and Drell under the command of an Alliance officer? That doesn't seem right. Is that really what the article said?

Yes, it was in the leaked OXM article I do believe.  I guess what with the fate of the galaxy at stake everyone put aside their differences

Yeah,  war is the great equalizer I guess. Maybe its some Council created task force and Admiral Hackett was appointed its leader, that'd be pretty cool.

[bigheadzach]

Ghost-621 wrote...

shinobi602 wrote...

*sigh*

Every time Casey says ME3 is the best place to start, I die a little more inside.

Prepare to die completely on the inside and outside when you find out that NONE of your choices matter, because all it's actually about is filling up a meter in the corner of your screen.

Instead of a series of IF statements checking certain conditions being met? Where is the proof the War Assets system completely replaces choice making entirely?

[masterkajo]

Why can the Mayor of Bluebell already enjoy himself some ME3 and I am stuck waiting until March?

[shepskisaac]

Ghost-621 wrote...

shinobi602 wrote...

*sigh*

Every time Casey says ME3 is the best place to start, I die a little more inside.

Prepare to die completely on the inside and outside when you find out that NONE of your choices matter, because all it's actually about is filling up a meter in the corner of your screen.

What a nonsense. Galactic Readiness Level is only one of the factors that influence the ending. You can't get the best ending just by maxing GRL out. Choices (from all 3 games) will still be the most important:

@gtez Does maxing out Galactic Readiness Level automatically GUARANTEES the best ending or merely makes it achievable depending on choices?

Choice of course! And the structure doesn't quite work that simply. There are many factors to the ending. Readiness is 1.

twitter.com/#!/gtez/status/123916777854996480

Modifié par IsaacShep, 12 octobre 2011 - 08:47 .

[Killjoy Cutter]

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

Not sure about the name calling since I never read those posts only read the ones in which people were attempting to argue that quote without resorting to name calling.

Also Casey hudson in the same video directly after that quote says "If you wanna do a really complete single player playthrough. Then you can absolutely get to the highest level of success in the endgame."

Here's what really confuses me:  why is one dev quote being treated as the irrefutable Gospel Of The Worst-Case Scenario by Killjoy, and yet another quote from that very same person that soundly contradicts his interpretation,  not to mention those from other devs, automatically suspect and not to be entered into evidence? 

It's not that any one is being taken as Gospel Truth, it's that as a whole all the posted dev quotes and comments look like a company trying to have it both ways. 

"MP is great and will really enhance your SP experience!"
"You'll never notice a difference in your SP experience if you don't touch the MP!" 

Both are correct, but 1# is optional.

I really don't think both can be true at the same time...

[didymos1120]

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

It's not that any one is being taken as Gospel Truth, it's that as a whole all the posted dev quotes and comments look like a company trying to have it both ways. 

OK, fine, but then why are you so determined to keep on with the "I get a better ending if I do co-op and only if I do co-op" thing.  That's what you seem to have taken as gospel, when, if it truly is so ambiguous, your position should simply be "This is a bit too equivocal, and you and me Bioware, we got some trust issues, so I'm not willing to commit to any position at this time."

[NOD-INFORMER37]

Brenon's relaying our concerns to the rest of the crew ppl, there may be hope!

Because I really dont want to press this http://nooooooooooooooo.com/ when Mass Effect 3 comes out. xP

Modifié par NOD-INFORMER37, 12 octobre 2011 - 09:04 .

[JD196]

For best ending play multiplayer?" It's an alternative - possible to get best #ME3 ending through SP alone. @CaseyDHudson

That is the truth. MP will affect SP if you play it.
If you don't it won't.

[bigheadzach]

For levity's sake:

(use sparingly and in good form)

http://pull.imgfave....64287467568.jpg

Modifié par bigheadzach, 12 octobre 2011 - 08:55 .

[TheGreenAlloy]

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

TheGreenAlloy wrote...

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

didymos1120 wrote...

1136342t54 wrote...

Not sure about the name calling since I never read those posts only read the ones in which people were attempting to argue that quote without resorting to name calling.

Also Casey hudson in the same video directly after that quote says "If you wanna do a really complete single player playthrough. Then you can absolutely get to the highest level of success in the endgame."

Here's what really confuses me:  why is one dev quote being treated as the irrefutable Gospel Of The Worst-Case Scenario by Killjoy, and yet another quote from that very same person that soundly contradicts his interpretation,  not to mention those from other devs, automatically suspect and not to be entered into evidence? 

It's not that any one is being taken as Gospel Truth, it's that as a whole all the posted dev quotes and comments look like a company trying to have it both ways. 

"MP is great and will really enhance your SP experience!"
"You'll never notice a difference in your SP experience if you don't touch the MP!" 

Both are correct, but 1# is optional.

I really don't think both can be true at the same time...

Lol.

[SilentNukee]

Ah yeah, the excitement continues. I like this.

[Killjoy Cutter]

JD196 wrote...

For best ending play multiplayer?" It's an alternative - possible to get best #ME3 ending through SP alone. @CaseyDHudson

That is the truth. MP will affect SP if you play it.
If you don't it won't.

That's a very fine line to cut. 

[JD196]

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

That's a very fine line to cut. 

How so?

[Shifty Assassin]

Please be split-screen

[ratshady]

Need to see more before I play more of the multiplayer than the single player.

[TheGreenAlloy]

JD196 wrote...

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

That's a very fine line to cut. 

How so?

[ElitePinecone]

Very exciting!

[zweistein_J]

it seems to me like the Mass Effect 3: Galaxy at War will be like a totally different game, with a plot parallel to that of Shepard's story in the Mass Effect 3 campaign.
And (if i got it right) by playing the co-op you will be able to free some planets or places of interest from the "enemy", and that will have some impact on the single player campaign like different dialogue options and small storyline issues.
The more im looking into it the more interesting it seems to me.
The co-op mode seems to be made in a way to motivate the players to play it, but not in a way to have to play it as a mandatory feature, so that anyone can finish the SP campaign the way they wish.

[Mako Zalos]

So only six races we can be in CoOp. Well we know five what do you think the sixth will be.

[Strephon Gentry]

I'm just munching on the popcorn while watching the fireworks...

Some people just take things to seriously.

Please. Continue.

[alex90c]

Mako Zalos wrote...

So only six races we can be in CoOp. Well we know five what do you think the sixth will be.

humans
asari
krogan
turian
salarian
drell

there we go

[Savber100]

I like what I'm seeing. Of all the options for the MP, this was the best one.

The hate for ME3 and Bioware is based on two misunderstanding that:

1. MP = Bad SP
2. MP= Bad game mode = Bad game