Aller au contenu

Photo

Origin will be required to play Mass Effect 3


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
3140 réponses à ce sujet

#2751
Killjoy Cutter

Killjoy Cutter
  • Members
  • 6 005 messages
http://www.forbes.co...ch-of-mistakes/

Facebook is being hit with a decent-sized stick by the FTC over a somewhat related issue regarding the use and sharing of their customers' data.

Of note is the long and filthy history of Facebook changing how Facebook constantly changed their privacy policy to evade and avoid customer opt-outs.  Some lowlights: 



[*]In December 2009, Facebook changed its website so certain information that users may have designated as private – such as their Friends List – was made public. They didn’t warn users that this change was coming, or get their approval in advance.
[*]Facebook represented that third-party apps that users’ installed would have access only to user information that they needed to operate. In fact, the apps could access nearly all of users’ personal data – data the apps didn’t need.
[*]Facebook told users they could restrict sharing of data to limited audiences – for example with “Friends Only.” In fact, selecting “Friends Only” did not prevent their information from being shared with third-party applications their friends used.
[*]Facebook had a “Verified Apps” program & claimed it certified the security of participating apps. It didn’t.
[*]Facebook promised users that it would not share their personal information with advertisers. It did.
[*]Facebook claimed that when users deactivated or deleted their accounts, their photos and videos would be inaccessible. But Facebook allowed access to the content, even after users had deactivated or deleted their accounts.
[*]Facebook claimed that it complied with the U.S.- EU Safe Harbor Framework that governs data transfer between the U.S. and the European Union. It didn’t.[/list]

Modifié par Killjoy Cutter, 29 novembre 2011 - 07:18 .


#2752
Killjoy Cutter

Killjoy Cutter
  • Members
  • 6 005 messages

Trekfanboy wrote...

strive wrote...

I don't understand why they don't just make an opt out option regarding "personal data collection" before you install the platform/specific game. Making it an absolute necessity is a poor business choice. The only people who are going to actively look for that tic-box are the ones who give a crap. Look at all the idiots that don't bother reading/unchecking the tic-box for bing and yahoo tool bars.


An "opt out" option isn't a guaranteed solution either ... and I'm not just taking about "idiots who don't bother reading/unchecking the tic-box."

I work for a large company that manages MILLIONS of online registrations for various websites. The laws regarding opt out (at least here in the US) are TOTALLY in favor of companies that want to use (and abuse) customer data.

All you have to do is give people the ability to "opt out" ... even if it's almost impossible to do because of the roadblocks a company puts in place ... and then the company has legal protection and can force everyone to automatically "opt in" when they register a product or sign up for a service.

I suspect that a large company like EA would work in much the same way regarding Origin DRM and the Origin Store even if they give you an opt out. You're signed up to let EA do whatever they want.

Thank big businesses padding the pockets of politicians for the weak laws protecting you from companies misusing and abusing your data.


If it were up to me, all gathering, buying, selling, and sharing of personal data would require an opt-in.  If the data is personally identifiable, the opt-in would have to be in the form of a signed paper dcoument kept on file as long as the data was kept on file.  This would be on the books as criminal law, meaning that any individual knowingly vioating the law would face criminal charges and possible prison time.

#2753
CenturyCrow

CenturyCrow
  • Members
  • 675 messages

lastpatriot wrote...

If EA gets the idea that Origin is costing them more money in sales than they get in benefits, they will change things.

That is the key point on how to get this changed.  The question remains, how can we influence this result before ME:3 is released?

I rather doubt that all the PC users together will affect any of EA's decisions. We're a tiny minority. If anything, it will be the BioWare end that may influence a change and that would more likely be game oriented than policy oriented.

For many of us, the cost of a new game ($50.00 - 70.00) can vary from a minor or major expense (more significant during the recession with much higher unemployment). But for the games industry, a multi-billion dollar business, it's a greater risk and a completely different mindset. We just want a good game; they want to repeat the sales of the next Call of Duty on all platforms, console, tablet, cell phone, PC, etc. So the major corporations do what they can to minimize their risk. Lobbying the governments resulted in significant tax breaks in the US, Canada, Ireland and probably other places for the game industry--an industry that is NOT struggling (do a Google search on tax-breaks for game companies).

IF there's a significant media covered outcry such as what happened in Germany, there will be a response from the policy makers but it's really damage control.

Our PC complaints for the most part are moot, as I've said before. We just have to hope we can live with or work around whatever is decided, unfortunately. Every year a significant portion of the game market sets a new sales record by buying a 'repainted' version of Call of Duty on the console--marketing and development teams seem to have a captive audience. The game industry is more lucrative than the film industry now. The 'social' sites like Facebook have huge numbers, almost another captive audience for marketing and their advertising schemes.

Modifié par CenturyCrow, 29 novembre 2011 - 09:22 .


#2754
Trekfanboy

Trekfanboy
  • Members
  • 57 messages

Killjoy Cutter wrote...

If it were up to me, all gathering, buying, selling, and sharing of personal data would require an opt-in.  If the data is personally identifiable, the opt-in would have to be in the form of a signed paper dcoument kept on file as long as the data was kept on file.  This would be on the books as criminal law, meaning that any individual knowingly vioating the law would face criminal charges and possible prison time.


AMEN.

You'll hear NO complaint from me regarding your suggestion. Despite the fact that my pay check comes from a company that plays it fast and loose with "opt outs" (essentially signing people up for spam lists and recording data when they probably don't want to), I absolutely HATE it when my personal data is misused like that just so a company can make a few extra bucks off of me.

#2755
Lukertin

Lukertin
  • Members
  • 1 060 messages

Zannana wrote...

If they search for other pirated EA games/media/properties/ illegal hacks/mods I'd say that's quite fair.

No it is not. Even the police needs a warrant or express permission to  search your house. EA thinks of itself as something greater?

Because under US law, while evidence collected by the government without a warrant or consent may be excluded in a court of law, such evidence collected by a private person who is not acting for the government, is not excludable, period.

So yea, they think of themselves as something greater because they are.

#2756
CenturyCrow

CenturyCrow
  • Members
  • 675 messages
SOPA has been brought up a few times in this thread but I don't want to derail the discussion on Origin for ME 3. So I started a new post under Off-Topic about a recent court action that is indicative of how SOPA will (probably) work. Please discuss it in the link below, not in this thread.

Thanks

Edit: thanks Salsa, fixed
social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/13/index/8759330

Modifié par CenturyCrow, 29 novembre 2011 - 11:36 .


#2757
SalsaDMA

SalsaDMA
  • Members
  • 2 512 messages

CenturyCrow wrote...

SOPA has been brought up a few times in this thread but I don't want to derail the discussion on Origin for ME 3. So I started a new post under Off-Topic about a recent court action that is indicative of how SOPA will (probably) work. Please discuss it in the link below, not in this thread.

Thanks

http://social.biowar.../index/8759330 


Your link doesn't link proper on my system. it inserts superflous http:// in front.

correct link on my system have been social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/13/index/8759330 ?

#2758
Killjoy Cutter

Killjoy Cutter
  • Members
  • 6 005 messages

Lukertin wrote...

Zannana wrote...

If they search for other pirated EA games/media/properties/ illegal hacks/mods I'd say that's quite fair.

No it is not. Even the police needs a warrant or express permission to  search your house. EA thinks of itself as something greater?

Because under US law, while evidence collected by the government without a warrant or consent may be excluded in a court of law, such evidence collected by a private person who is not acting for the government, is not excludable, period.

So yea, they think of themselves as something greater because they are.


Careful in that thinking -- for example, in many states, a private citizen recording a coversation without informing all parties involved is a felony. 

#2759
InvincibleHero

InvincibleHero
  • Members
  • 2 676 messages
This is going to be obne post to respond to everyone to save time.

1. You buy a product in a store they have anti-theft device and cameras and people spying on you for theft of product. I tend to think a peek at my install list is less invasive than that.

2. Your IP and cell phone companies have a record of each and every call and every site and what you downloaded there. How do you think the MPAA and records companies bust people. They get a screename or IP address from a pirate site and bingo bango you're busted. If you are worried about privacy there are more violations.

3. You're kidding yourselves that what programs you have installed is private. You can bet OS makes MS and Apple know what nad I bet Flash and most other programs reference the master install list too. If you've sent in an error report to any company (or even on help sites like guru) for tech support they have all your running processes and surprise all installed programs.

4. "The proof" cited is weak. It was even said it didn't read anything and it was not said to transmit any of that information. As far as aprogram is concerned your data is a string of 1s and 0s without any being sent then you have nothing to complain about. It is likely looking for specifics like a virus scan and there is only a problem when it comes up positive match and I would assume that is for pirated EA IPs. I do not have to worry because I don't steal anything.

5. Your ultimate right is to not buy it and that's it. If you don't like the terms then don't enter the agreement. It's that simple.

6. Registering for websites to check caps for winning codes etc etc you give up far more personal information than EA is likely to get. You already gave them your name address and IP address and all that jazz when you signed up for online accounts.

7. You don't even know what it is looking for yet say they will sell info to advertisers. What info and about what? Your bank sells info, your credit card, your phone company, any company you've bought from sells your name on a list to another, charities do it just donate to one and you'll get dozens of requests in a month's time. This includes such "personal data" as name age birthdate if they have it address workplace phone number. Your private info isn't private anyways.

I'm extremely careful about it and control all my cookies yet one of those online sites have my age address and everything. it could have been me applying for jobs where this info was sold. If you gave it out online anywhere then it is gone. EA is not going to get anything they couldn't already. The rest is unlike to be of interest to them.

Yet if you agree to it by accepting the terms then you cannot complain about it. I agree with not liking it but the choice becomes accept terms or don't get game. I doubt they are going to bend much on it because they don't have to. Rail all you want because you are wasting your time though maybe get some catharsis from venting.

I could go on but that's enough. My regards to those that kept it civil. :)

You've been a wonderful audience, IH has left the building.

#2760
Bogsnot1

Bogsnot1
  • Members
  • 7 997 messages

InvincibleHero wrote...
1. You buy a product in a store they have anti-theft device and cameras and people spying on you for theft of product. I tend to think a peek at my install list is less invasive than that.

You are on private property when you do so. As long as you have been informed you are under surveillance, they have the right to do so. To use your analogy, think of it like the shop's security staff follow you home, walk around taking notes of all of your possessions, and then can have you charged with theft if you cannot produce a receipt for anythnig they query.

2. Your IP and cell phone companies have a record of each and every call and every site and what you downloaded there. How do you think the MPAA and records companies bust people. They get a screename or IP address from a pirate site and bingo bango you're busted. If you are worried about privacy there are more violations.

Many courts have ruled that an IP address cannot be used to personally identify somenoe, especially as there have ben many cases were they have sued people whose computer history has showed they have never once attended any pirate sites. The MPAA have even sued a 78yo grandmother for downloading gangsta rap.
Most of the "pay us or go to court" notices are now being thrown out, along with the "John Doe" lawsuits, as they have been shown to violate peoples rights to a fair trial.

3. You're kidding yourselves that what programs you have installed is private. You can bet OS makes MS and Apple know what nad I bet Flash and most other programs reference the master install list too. If you've sent in an error report to any company (or even on help sites like guru) for tech support they have all your running processes and surprise all installed programs.

Its not just whats installed, its the private and personal data that is also being scanned, accessed and uploaded by Origin. OS manufacturers do not do this. THIS is the privacy violations that has people concerned.
I cannot speak for the CUlt of Jobs, but the only infromation MS receives about my system is the Windows version, service packs, and relevant hardware. They have no idea if I'm running the LOIC, or AutoCAD, or any other software.

4. "The proof" cited is weak. It was even said it didn't read anything and it was not said to transmit any of that information. As far as aprogram is concerned your data is a string of 1s and 0s without any being sent then you have nothing to complain about. It is likely looking for specifics like a virus scan and there is only a problem when it comes up positive match and I would assume that is for pirated EA IPs. I do not have to worry because I don't steal anything.

Read up on the Sony Rootkit Debacle, and then say the same thing.

5. Your ultimate right is to not buy it and that's it. If you don't like the terms then don't enter the agreement. It's that simple.

Very true. We are letting the powers that be we dont want it. Smoe of us will still buy the game, but then download a cracked version of it to avoid it. Others wont buy the game, and will still download the cracked version. Most of us however, would prefer to support the devs.

6. Registering for websites to check caps for winning codes etc etc you give up far more personal information than EA is likely to get. You already gave them your name address and IP address and all that jazz when you signed up for online accounts.

I dont sign up for competitions. Many people dont. Even if I did, that website would not be scanning my PC for phone records, tax records, or any other form of financial information.

7. You don't even know what it is looking for yet say they will sell info to advertisers. What info and about what? Your bank sells info, your credit card, your phone company, any company you've bought from sells your name on a list to another, charities do it just donate to one and you'll get dozens of requests in a month's time. This includes such "personal data" as name age birthdate if they have it address workplace phone number. Your private info isn't private anyways.

Then why do they need to do such an in depth scan on what I have installed, what I browse on the net, what letters I write, and whom I contact, if not for marketting, either for their own sales departments, or to on-sell to others?

I'm extremely careful about it and control all my cookies yet one of those online sites have my age address and everything. it could have been me applying for jobs where this info was sold. If you gave it out online anywhere then it is gone. EA is not going to get anything they couldn't already. The rest is unlike to be of interest to them.

Then that was a failure on your part. Cookies only store personal information that you have directly entered into some website, or online form.
Either the website purchased your information from a third party, or accessed your cookies after you had entered that information in elsewhere, and before you had gotten around to clearing out your cookies.

Yet if you agree to it by accepting the terms then you cannot complain about it. I agree with not liking it but the choice becomes accept terms or don't get game. I doubt they are going to bend much on it because they don't have to. Rail all you want because you are wasting your time though maybe get some catharsis from venting.

The problems is the EULA doesnt cmoe out and say exactly what it will be doing. Gamers familiar with Steam, would simply assume its going to do teh same form of cheat checknig, instead, the EULA is left deliberately vague, and its up to curious individuals to determine exactly what its doing. Because of the very natuer of what it scans, and that nothign appears to be off limits, is the reason why we are rebelling against it.

We paid for the product. We supported the developers. We are legitimate customers, and yet we are being treated as criminals. The actual criminals do not have to suffer these indignities. The more we are forced to suffer for actually being honest, the less likely we are to be honest in the future.

EA, Ubisoft and Blizzard are currently doing a pretty good job of convincing me that pirating games is the way of the future. After all, I cant complain about being treated like a criminal, if I actually act like one, can I?

#2761
Embrosil

Embrosil
  • Members
  • 338 messages

Lumikki wrote...

Embrosil wrote...

Yes, that is why most of motherboards and graphics cards comes with a software for overclocking, right? In other words, no, overclocking does not voids your varranty.

Actually overclocking can avoid you warranty.

Issue isn't can you action break the warranty? What it can do, but has the company rights to check do you break of the warranty, inside you privacy. They don't have that right. They can check it only after you have bring the issue outside of you private zone. Do you understand the different?

Going inside the privacy is very stricticted by laws.

Problem here with Origin client is that companies thinks they have rights to check they rights inside someone private property. THEY DO NOT HAVE THAT RIGHT. Any company doing it, would BREAK LAWS.


Well then it is different here in the Czech Republic. Here you do not lose warranty if you overclock, especially if you are given a software by the manufacturer to do so.

But I agree in you in the rest. I will not install Origin no matter what. And half year ago I was arguing similary against Steam (why do I need Steam if I buy a hard copy). But there were some games that I simply wanted to play so now I am a Steam user :) But still agree that it is a nonesence to force it on hardcopies. At least Steam does not scan my PC and has an offline mode.

Modifié par Embrosil, 30 novembre 2011 - 08:36 .


#2762
Cheesy Blue

Cheesy Blue
  • Members
  • 1 381 messages
I like Origin :3

#2763
Adugan

Adugan
  • Members
  • 4 912 messages
Edit: Post removed. Name calling will get you banned. :devil:

Modifié par Chris Priestly, 30 novembre 2011 - 04:19 .


#2764
Cheesy Blue

Cheesy Blue
  • Members
  • 1 381 messages
Edit: quote removed. :devil:

Modifié par Chris Priestly, 30 novembre 2011 - 04:19 .


#2765
Lumikki

Lumikki
  • Members
  • 4 239 messages
This is little outside of topic, but related how ever. It tells that many (75%) of EU people have conserns how corporation use they personal information. Meaning companies has been missusing the private information they gather from people. So, EU is going to renew hole EU laws related data protections.

http://news.yahoo.co...-152922933.html

EU regulators have been concerned about how commercial online services use customers' personal data to attract advertisers, saying they want to make sure that citizens' Internet privacy rights are respected.


Modifié par Lumikki, 30 novembre 2011 - 10:50 .


#2766
SalsaDMA

SalsaDMA
  • Members
  • 2 512 messages

Adugan wrote...

Cheesy Blue wrote...

I like Origin :3


I hope you are not serious.


While I haven't tried Origin, I can imagine there is nothing preventing him from actually liking the program in its performance as a 'steam copy'.

The big poo of the issue which we all object to is somewhat hidden from the user if not looked for. At least if we only consider the privacy issue. The unified acount access making subtle threats towards users as well as EA's lack of security making people log into wrong acounts should be a clear sign to steer clear of the program, though.

#2767
SalsaDMA

SalsaDMA
  • Members
  • 2 512 messages

Lumikki wrote...

This is little outside of topic, but related how ever. It tells that many (75%) of EU people have conserns how corporation use they personal information. Meaning companies has been missusing the private information they gather from people. So, EU is going to renew hole EU laws related data protections.

http://news.yahoo.co...-152922933.html

EU regulators have been concerned about how commercial online services use customers' personal data to attract advertisers, saying they want to make sure that citizens' Internet privacy rights are respected.


I believe Facebook also got a reprimand recently in the states, and would be under surveilance for the next 20 years. Infractions would cost them 16k$ which could prob turn out to be alot of money if it is counting the amount of users they infract on as individual cases when making their poo-poos.

So at least something is being done in the states every now and then too. Although the entertainement industry seem hellbent on destroying what is left of civilian rights...

#2768
Killjoy Cutter

Killjoy Cutter
  • Members
  • 6 005 messages
I posted a link about Facebook's situation upthread, both as an aside that even in the US companies can go too far and get nailed by regulators, and as an example of the kind of fast and loose, highly dishonest, customer-as-dupe behavior that companies engage in when it comes to gathering and using YOUR information.

And by the way, the real change we need to see in both attitudes and laws is a realization that information about YOU is YOUR information.

#2769
Shepard the Leper

Shepard the Leper
  • Members
  • 638 messages

Bogsnot1 wrote...

We paid for the product. We supported the developers. We are legitimate customers, and yet we are being treated as criminals. The actual criminals do not have to suffer these indignities. The more we are forced to suffer for actually being honest, the less likely we are to be honest in the future.

EA, Ubisoft and Blizzard are currently doing a pretty good job of convincing me that pirating games is the way of the future. After all, I cant complain about being treated like a criminal, if I actually act like one, can I?


Indeed. It's hilarious that illegal versions are actually more user-friendly, easier to install, have faster loading and without any other pointless fuss compared to the real deal. Consumers are actually punished for using the legit version.

And the industry keeps complaining about piracy ... yeah right :(

#2770
DanaScu

DanaScu
  • Members
  • 355 messages
http://reviews.cnet....8-10391702.html

"Over the coming years, we will transform EA from a packaged goods company to a fully integrated digital entertainment company," Riccitiello told investors during an earnings call last month. "We're transforming EA to a games-as-a-service model."

http://www.vg247.com...tail-this-year/

"At the end of [2011], the digital business is bigger than the packaged goods business, full stop. No questions in my mind. Then, you know, I think that we'll find ways to even sell our packaged goods content in chunks and in pieces and subscriptions and micro-transactions."

Found this somewhere else. This seems to be the start of the digital only/microtransactions they were shooting for with the EADownloader. Now its called Origin. And the privacy issue is still there.

I would like to finish Shepard's story. But there is no way I will ever install Origin on any system I use. The future, for me, seems to be going back to ignoring any title EA touches. I did it with no problems for 10 years; going back to that will be no problem.

#2771
dahoughtonuk

dahoughtonuk
  • Members
  • 70 messages

Shepard the Leper wrote...

Bogsnot1 wrote...

We paid for the product. We supported the developers. We are legitimate customers, and yet we are being treated as criminals. The actual criminals do not have to suffer these indignities. The more we are forced to suffer for actually being honest, the less likely we are to be honest in the future.

EA, Ubisoft and Blizzard are currently doing a pretty good job of convincing me that pirating games is the way of the future. After all, I cant complain about being treated like a criminal, if I actually act like one, can I?


Indeed. It's hilarious that illegal versions are actually more user-friendly, easier to install, have faster loading and without any other pointless fuss compared to the real deal. Consumers are actually punished for using the legit version.

And the industry keeps complaining about piracy ... yeah right :(


Yes, and that is the most anoying thing. But DRM was never really about punishing pirates, it was usually about squeezing more stuff out of the legit consumers.  I can understand why downloading software use DRM(even if I don't like it) But when it crosses from understandable(if ineffective) lock on their blackbox to installing their CCTV cameras in my home....

#2772
Killjoy Cutter

Killjoy Cutter
  • Members
  • 6 005 messages

DanaScu wrote...

http://reviews.cnet....8-10391702.html

"Over the coming years, we will transform EA from a packaged goods company to a fully integrated digital entertainment company," Riccitiello told investors during an earnings call last month. "We're transforming EA to a games-as-a-service model."

http://www.vg247.com...tail-this-year/

"At the end of [2011], the digital business is bigger than the packaged goods business, full stop. No questions in my mind. Then, you know, I think that we'll find ways to even sell our packaged goods content in chunks and in pieces and subscriptions and micro-transactions."

Found this somewhere else. This seems to be the start of the digital only/microtransactions they were shooting for with the EADownloader. Now its called Origin. And the privacy issue is still there.

I would like to finish Shepard's story. But there is no way I will ever install Origin on any system I use. The future, for me, seems to be going back to ignoring any title EA touches. I did it with no problems for 10 years; going back to that will be no problem.


EA is losing me as a customer, then.  Games are not a service, they are a product.  You buy and own the product.  The only reason to pay an ongoing fee on a game is the game design legitimately requires ongoing continuous access to an online system, such as an MMORPG, and the customer willing engages in that model of transaction. 

Software as a "service" is bull$#!+.

#2773
SalsaDMA

SalsaDMA
  • Members
  • 2 512 messages

DanaScu wrote...

http://reviews.cnet....8-10391702.html

"Over the coming years, we will transform EA from a packaged goods company to a fully integrated digital entertainment company," Riccitiello told investors during an earnings call last month. "We're transforming EA to a games-as-a-service model."

http://www.vg247.com...tail-this-year/

"At the end of [2011], the digital business is bigger than the packaged goods business, full stop. No questions in my mind. Then, you know, I think that we'll find ways to even sell our packaged goods content in chunks and in pieces and subscriptions and micro-transactions."

Found this somewhere else. This seems to be the start of the digital only/microtransactions they were shooting for with the EADownloader. Now its called Origin. And the privacy issue is still there.

I would like to finish Shepard's story. But there is no way I will ever install Origin on any system I use. The future, for me, seems to be going back to ignoring any title EA touches. I did it with no problems for 10 years; going back to that will be no problem.



Reading those links, the thing that strikes me the most is the profound lack of earthconnection in some companies these days.

It's not about earning money while supplying a service.
It's a bout having a misguided idea that the consumers are an infinite market you can wrangle ever more money from if you just squeeze harder...

And I bet these are the kind of guys that dole out ever increasing wage increases to themsleves, while continually cutting salaries at the ground floor "to make the company more competitive..."

I can't help but feel that at one point things will just boil over and the kettle explode in so much pain for everyone:?

#2774
Feanor_II

Feanor_II
  • Members
  • 916 messages

DanaScu wrote...

http://reviews.cnet....8-10391702.html

"Over the coming years, we will transform EA from a packaged goods company to a fully integrated digital entertainment company," Riccitiello told investors during an earnings call last month. "We're transforming EA to a games-as-a-service model."

http://www.vg247.com...tail-this-year/

"At the end of [2011], the digital business is bigger than the packaged goods business, full stop. No questions in my mind. Then, you know, I think that we'll find ways to even sell our packaged goods content in chunks and in pieces and subscriptions and micro-transactions."

Found this somewhere else. This seems to be the start of the digital only/microtransactions they were shooting for with the EADownloader. Now its called Origin. And the privacy issue is still there.

I would like to finish Shepard's story. But there is no way I will ever install Origin on any system I use. The future, for me, seems to be going back to ignoring any title EA touches. I did it with no problems for 10 years; going back to that will be no problem.

I saw this coming a long time ago, these means more money to spend for users and also more restrictions to them, gaming wil become much more expensive (if you want to play the whole game)...... But as I have seen people seem to be glad to waste their money, not many people has the critical view to see how consumers (an citizens) are being ripped off.

#2775
Killjoy Cutter

Killjoy Cutter
  • Members
  • 6 005 messages

SalsaDMA wrote...

DanaScu wrote...

http://reviews.cnet....8-10391702.html

"Over the coming years, we will transform EA from a packaged goods company to a fully integrated digital entertainment company," Riccitiello told investors during an earnings call last month. "We're transforming EA to a games-as-a-service model."

http://www.vg247.com...tail-this-year/

"At the end of [2011], the digital business is bigger than the packaged goods business, full stop. No questions in my mind. Then, you know, I think that we'll find ways to even sell our packaged goods content in chunks and in pieces and subscriptions and micro-transactions."

Found this somewhere else. This seems to be the start of the digital only/microtransactions they were shooting for with the EADownloader. Now its called Origin. And the privacy issue is still there.

I would like to finish Shepard's story. But there is no way I will ever install Origin on any system I use. The future, for me, seems to be going back to ignoring any title EA touches. I did it with no problems for 10 years; going back to that will be no problem.



Reading those links, the thing that strikes me the most is the profound lack of earthconnection in some companies these days.

It's not about earning money while supplying a service.
It's a bout having a misguided idea that the consumers are an infinite market you can wrangle ever more money from if you just squeeze harder...

And I bet these are the kind of guys that dole out ever increasing wage increases to themsleves, while continually cutting salaries at the ground floor "to make the company more competitive..."

I can't help but feel that at one point things will just boil over and the kettle explode in so much pain for everyone:?


At least we can hope that EA goes the way of more than a few companies that become this detached from reality. 

Unfortunately, they have the exclusive NFL franchise for years to come, giving them an income stream to survive mistakes that would kill other companies.