So, what do you guys think of this? Is it a good idea to have your companions develop relationships with each other? Do you like how it was implemented?
Modifié par Zanallen, 13 octobre 2011 - 10:28 .
Modifié par Zanallen, 13 octobre 2011 - 10:28 .
TheJediSaint wrote...
Well, all the companions develop relationships with each other, though not romantic for the most part. Aveline and Isabella have a kind of vitriolic friendship, Varric is everybody's buddy, Merrill and Isabella have a of little sister-big sister thing going. Which makes sense in the context of DA2's storyline, these people know each other for years, after all.
Quinnzel wrote...
I've always had a dislike for inter-party romancing, especially with the available LI's PC can romance.
A lot of the times people mention it, or speak in favor of it, I just remember the whole Haer'Dalis/Aerie thing from Baldurs Gate, which was such a damn pain way back when. Having to go into the CLAUconsole to fix things. (I do believe I just killed the damned tiefling in the end)
I can understand why people would want to see more of them, but I simply cant come to the same conclusion. Hell, I routinely bring Carver into the deeproads to die/ be tainted simply for talking to Merrill (foreveraloneCarver.jpg)
Non LI interparty romances (Aveline and Donnic eg.) I can totally get behind.
Modifié par TheJediSaint, 13 octobre 2011 - 12:57 .
Modifié par whykikyouwhy, 13 octobre 2011 - 12:56 .
Zanallen wrote...
So, as most of you may know, in DA2 your companions can develop relationships outside of the usual PC x Companion scenario. There is a whole quest to get Aveline to hook up with Donnic and they can eventually get married. It is implied that, if Hawke doesn't romance either of them, Isabela and Fenris have a thing going on. In MotA, it seems like Bethany has the hots for Seb and we all know that Carver has a thing for elves.
So, what do you guys think of this? Is it a good idea to have your companions develop relationships with each other? Do you like how it was implemented?
dreadpiratesnugglecakes wrote...
Zanallen wrote...
So, as most of you may know, in DA2 your companions can develop relationships outside of the usual PC x Companion scenario. There is a whole quest to get Aveline to hook up with Donnic and they can eventually get married. It is implied that, if Hawke doesn't romance either of them, Isabela and Fenris have a thing going on. In MotA, it seems like Bethany has the hots for Seb and we all know that Carver has a thing for elves.
So, what do you guys think of this? Is it a good idea to have your companions develop relationships with each other? Do you like how it was implemented?
I didn't think it was implemented very well at all. For all of their strong friendships, nobody helped Fenris clean his ****ing house for almost a decade! How do live in a house full of garbage and dead bodies? Entertaining friends..romancing them? It was annoying. I hated going in there.
Modifié par TheJediSaint, 13 octobre 2011 - 01:38 .
Dave of Canada wrote...
I'd be pro-inter-party romances provided it has some role in the story (You leave one to die in the Deep Roads and the other is absolutely furious with you, slowly growing to understand you did what needed to be done but still providing constant conflict, ect) or it's after the protagonist is past the "point of no return" for romances.
I don't like catfights.
TheJediSaint wrote...
Something along the lines of Khalid and Jaheria in BG1, I take it?
Dave of Canada wrote...
TheJediSaint wrote...
Something along the lines of Khalid and Jaheria in BG1, I take it?
Didn't play the first one, I'm afraid.
Modifié par TheJediSaint, 13 octobre 2011 - 01:43 .
JJDrakken wrote...
I would like to see the current relationships with your current love, to evolve into something more, perhaps marriage, kids, exploding a Tevinter Tower together, something.
Oneiropolos wrote...
But yeah, I just... didn't care for it. I don't need to be the ultra special snowflake, but my instant reaction is "Wait, would Isabelle and Fenris be more happy together than when they are with my Hawke? What if being with my Hawke is the bad decision and I'm ruining their chance at actual love?" It's...conflicting and a bit disturbing for me. /
whykikyouwhy wrote...
I think the inter-party relationships give the companions additional depth and nuance. It makes complete sense for people who have adventured together for so many years to meet and interact outside of said adventuring and romps, away from the spiders and dragons. So we hear about card games at the Hanged Man and solstice parties - it simply adds layers, makes them less static and much more interesting.
I'm not especially keen on the companion-companion romances, but that
could just be my own bias regarding Isabela's relationship with my canon
Hawke. Selfish of me, I know.
Modifié par thats1evildude, 13 octobre 2011 - 06:45 .
I also agree. I'd like to see these interactions fleshed out in future BioWare games. And instead of just hearing about the companions hanging out together, it'd be nice to actually see that one or two times.thats1evildude wrote...
whykikyouwhy wrote...
I think the inter-party relationships give the companions additional depth and nuance. It makes complete sense for people who have adventured together for so many years to meet and interact outside of said adventuring and romps, away from the spiders and dragons. So we hear about card games at the Hanged Man and solstice parties - it simply adds layers, makes them less static and much more interesting.
I'm not especially keen on the companion-companion romances, but that
could just be my own bias regarding Isabela's relationship with my canon
Hawke. Selfish of me, I know.
I agree with your first point, but less with your second. I don't mind the other party members "hooking up" when I don't romance them. I think Bethany's crush on Sebastian is cute, and if I'm not romancing Isabela, I don't object to her pouncing on Fenris.
Modifié par Fidget6, 13 octobre 2011 - 07:00 .
The Big Nothing wrote...
"Intra-companion"? As in, the relationship between the stomach and intestines?