Nyoka wrote...
KenKenpachi wrote...
That woman is from an Army that hasn't fought a real war since 1945. and barely has enough willing recruits.
True, also irrelevant.
as to the later.
They aren't men, only cannon fodder fit for the slaughter.
They are men. I'm sorry if the fact that they are men upsets you to the point of denying reality.
Not a mute point on the battle field, they will only be caputerd and raped. (Yes you have rules on such, but look around how many of those conventions are fallowed?) That is the way of War son. Nevermind in todays world the Western forces basic training in praticular for infantry is a joke, while Eastern forces still train with live ammo and brutality that is nearly equal to a real war. So while the Dutch soldier or American may get his rights and stress guard, the Spetsnaz is getting machine gun rounds fired past his head, and crawling in literal pools of blood....well what will such a soldier do to a female that has the nerve to wear uniform or dare to fight him? Its rather simple.
In Fact in us Military women run a shorter corse in basic, do less fitness training and are rotated out of units in far faster norms than the male counterpart, as rape is panademic in Military units (in fact its reported at %40 versus invistigations that hold the view of it being as high as %80, praticularly the infantry ( awoman in uniform runs a 10 times greater chance of being raped while in uniform than as a civilian). Women however do not report it for the most given threats of death from the stonger more aggressive male counter part, of peer preassure to "protect the honor of the unit" and this is not just an American problem.
But it is clear from those statistics they clearly can not resist......uhh "physical" aggression. The only reason for the growth in numbers among them is political bull ****, and lastly the sad state of the modern urbanized western male.
In the nations where these problems arn't rampant, these women stand in base facilities, or in all female units, reserve, or guard forces, as is the case with the IDF, JSDF, PLA-AF-N-M-armed police. The Russian MVD, boardguards, and the Army.
And no, no they arn't, it takes more than the dangelly bits to make a man. They are worth less and scum for the most, who's best purpose is to serve as human shields to more able soldiers. Then again I don't connect on the Human Element as you do, and can see them as being less than ideal if needed in a military context.
In fact in real military units the guy walking point is ment to die first and tends to be who the squad leader hates. So its not so strange to think that way.
Anyways this is reaching temp ban and topic lock region. So yeah I'll leave it be.
As an edit to women in the armed services, I fully support them in support roles or manning defenses, but not in front line infantry units. Hell I even support them in the Airforce as combat pilots, or snipers in the Army. Mainly as the propaganda risks are light, as a person thats in a bad way in those units won't survive to be captured.
And in the defense role if they are threatend and important homeland defenses, you've lost or will need to call up your whole population anyways.
Modifié par KenKenpachi, 14 octobre 2011 - 09:58 .
Ce sujet est fermé
Guest_Nyoka_*
Retour en haut
