69 réponses à ce sujet

[Bubbajoe2010]

I'm just wondering weither or not yout think that their should be another dragon age game, if so what do you think they should change and keep.


Personally i think they need to bring back to crossbows, well i've always been a fan of bows of anykind but have become attached to the crowssbow,

Now what do you think?

[Bubbajoe2010]

i see what you are saying, i wanna see them open up the map where you have to actually walk or run, to the spot not go to a map and just click on where you wanna go. i wanna actually wanna see the world that I'm passing by

[seraphymon]

theres already tons of threads asking what they should keep, bring back, or dismiss. As for another DA game. Well nothing is official but i think they have made it clear there will be. and im willing to guess that the future of it will depend on its success. BUt the way they are talking, honestly its just looking like more of DA2.

[Bubbajoe2010]

i mean dot get me wrong i love DA2 (which i havent beat) but i think they need to branch it off some how, bring in something new like a new monster a new class something!

[Cutlass Jack]

Yes there will be a DA3.

What do I think they need to bring back? Pickpocketing and other thieving abilities that work outisde of combat. Also Swords for rogues. Or give them Rapiers if they really insist on keeping the silly class gear limitations. A duelist without fencing blades is embarassing.

[KilrB]

Another Dragon Age?

You'll have to ask The Divine about that, but it won't be any time soon as the current one isn't over yet ...

Seriously though ...

If EA comes to it's senses and looks at the numbers from DA2, and the current sentiments toward it in the gaming "community", it wouldn't surprise me if they pull the plug on what's currently in development for DA3 ... and possibly the entire DA IP.

Thanks a WHOLE freaking lot Laidlaw & co.

[Ihatebadgames]

EA in the 90's liked to buy properties run them down(streamlined)change things around say something like Gee no one wants to buy these sort of games anymore so here is more football.I really wish I still had thos old game mags.It would be interesting to see the games they let die vs. the games they kept alive.What a kick in the pants it would be if they kept more alive than killed off.
But I do worry about a new Dragon Age.

[AlexXIV]

Cutlass Jack wrote...

Yes there will be a DA3.

What do I think they need to bring back? Pickpocketing and other thieving abilities that work outisde of combat. Also Swords for rogues. Or give them Rapiers if they really insist on keeping the silly class gear limitations. A duelist without fencing blades is embarassing.

They should really look at Bethesda/Obsidian. As much as they probably dislike (to admit) that their competition is doing things better, compared to Fallout for example Bioware lockpicking is a joke. The only use of it is to get some extra loot. But it could be more, it could be an optional way to solve quests. As in, if you need to bring back an item you have the choice to kill everyone on the way, or, you sneak them by (i.e. with the main character or a sneaky companion) and recover the item without anyone noticing. Bioware is just putting too much emphasis on killing stuff, it's not Diablo.

Modifié par AlexXIV, 17 octobre 2011 - 09:07 .

[Garden of Heaven]

I agree, Dragon Age should have more minigames like Fallout, they will add more variety to the game.

[Cutlass Jack]

AlexXIV wrote...

They should really look at Bethesda/Obsidian. As much as they probably dislike (to admit) that their competition is doing things better, compared to Fallout for example Bioware lockpicking is a joke. The only use of it is to get some extra loot. But it could be more, it could be an optional way to solve quests. As in, if you need to bring back an item you have the choice to kill everyone on the way, or, you sneak them by (i.e. with the main character or a sneaky companion) and recover the item without anyone noticing. Bioware is just putting too much emphasis on killing stuff, it's not Diablo.

I agree on this, and it does tie into what I was saying. Lockpicking, even though it was still in, was completely trivialized in DA2. Unlocking a complex chest only to get a pair of torn trousers was rediculous. They were completely afraid to put anything worthwhile in locked chests because people might complain they were forced to bring rogues around.

[Eudaemonium]

KilrB wrote...

Another Dragon Age?

You'll have to ask The Divine about that, but it won't be any time soon as the current one isn't over yet ...

Seriously though ...

If EA comes to it's senses and looks at the numbers from DA2, and the current sentiments toward it in the gaming "community", it wouldn't surprise me if they pull the plug on what's currently in development for DA3 ... and possibly the entire DA IP.

Thanks a WHOLE freaking lot Laidlaw & co.

The game shipped over 2 million copies, regardless of reasons that is enough to garner the funding for a sequel. It is not a small amount.

EDIT: I should note that I am aware that this is less than half what Origins shipped, however this is still a sizable quantity of copies - enough to merit future investment.

Cutlass Jack wrote...

I agree on this, and
it does tie into what I was saying. Lockpicking, even though it was
still in, was completely trivialized in DA2. Unlocking a complex chest
only to get a pair of torn trousers was rediculous. They were completely
afraid to put anything worthwhile in locked chests because people might
complain they were forced to bring rogues around.

I definitely agree here. I think what irks me more is they could have got around the issue by having the areas *returnable to*, which for some inexplicable reason they weren't 99% of the time (and were at really random ones). It wasn't as if the various caves/tunnels/warehouses even used teh same entrances within the same act, so it's not like that was a problem.

Modifié par Eudaemonium, 17 octobre 2011 - 01:50 .

[Aaleel]

I'm sure there will be. But a DA3 will probably have to stand completely on it's own. I doubt it will pull the amount of pre-orders that DA2 did. I think it will have to get a good initial response to be successful.

[Slayer299]

Yeah, there'll be another DA3. It was enough of a "Success" (and I use that term lightly) that it probably exceeded its cost. But if DA3's going to succeed its going to need to really address a boatload of issues that the DLC's have started to touch on several of.

Aaleel wrote...
I'm sure there will be. But a DA3 will probably have to stand completely on it's own. I doubt it will pull the amount of pre-orders that DA2 did. I think it will have to get a good initial response to be successful.

I disagree, at least to the extent that DA3 won't exist in a complete vacuum and it will probably reference events (based on imports), since the setup ending, the beginning with Varric and talk with Flemeth all seem to say events have spun out of control.

[Aaleel]

Slayer299 wrote...


Yeah, there'll be another DA3. It was enough of a "Success" (and I use that term lightly) that it probably exceeded its cost. But if DA3's going to succeed its going to need to really address a boatload of issues that the DLC's have started to touch on several of.

Aaleel wrote...
I'm sure there will be. But a DA3 will probably have to stand completely on it's own. I doubt it will pull the amount of pre-orders that DA2 did. I think it will have to get a good initial response to be successful.

I disagree, at least to the extent that DA3 won't exist in a complete vacuum and it will probably reference events (based on imports), since the setup ending, the beginning with Varric and talk with Flemeth all seem to say events have spun out of control.

You misunderstood my point.  I didn't mean stand alone as in completely new game.  I meant stand alone as in not having a huge wave of popularity and critical success from it's predecessor generating a ton of pre orders.  I think it will be more wait and see this time. 

[Bmeszaros]

I think there has to be another one. I believe its been all but officially confirmed it will happen, they left the previous one with a "cliffhanger" and I think the poor sales numbers will provide a solid excuse to attempt to "repair some bridges" with the franchises' fanbase that loved the first one and didn't much care for DA2.

The outcry over this game is still pretty strong among the hardcore fans of the first game, making a DA3 seems like money in the bank just by making it, not necessarily addressing concerns from the second game. The people complain, but they will still likely buy it....

Mr. Laidlaw's "promotion" to Creative Director (which was my tipping point in favor of not purchasing DA3 new) of the franchise seems to ensure continued work on future Dragon Ages as well....

I honestly think the game will sell well initially, just like DA2, and may taper off slower than DA2's drop simply because I think retrograde improvements or features will be added back into the franchise or expanded upon, I think it will end up being closer to what we thought DA2 maybe should have been....

Modifié par Bmeszaros, 17 octobre 2011 - 03:11 .

[Feanor_II]

Yes, no doubt about that.

But depending how it turns out could be the last one.

[Bio Addict]

As others have said there's been no "official announcement" yet but we know they're in the earliest stages of designing it. All we've really heard thus far is talk of "marrying the best of Origins and DA2."

[Phaedros]

After DA2 who cares?

[King Minos]

They pretty much confirmed it without saying announcing Dragon Age 3, said the next game will be the best of both worlds.

[devSin]

I think the real question is what all these people would be doing if there wasn't. Sure, some could go to ME3, but not all. Maybe some for TOR, but probably not much (if any).

I guess it would have to be Jade Empire 2 or something brand new. The problem with brand new, of course, is that they've already wasted a bunch of time on Thedas, and there's not much business case to be made for starting over again that I can see.

So yeah, it'll be Dragon Age something. That or there'll be a short run on pink paper in Edmonton.

[NOD-INFORMER37]

I actually never played Dragon Age.

How is that series anyway? I heard the first was better than second but other than that I have no idea what its about...

[MagmaSaiyan]

devSin wrote...

I think the real question is what all these people would be doing if there wasn't. Sure, some could go to ME3, but not all. Maybe some for TOR, but probably not much (if any).

I guess it would have to be Jade Empire 2 or something brand new. The problem with brand new, of course, is that they've already wasted a bunch of time on Thedas, and there's not much business case to be made for starting over again that I can see.

So yeah, it'll be Dragon Age something. That or there'll be a short run on pink paper in Edmonton.

ha! i would probably play out the rest of my playthroughs in Origins, and DA2, once im done ill be playing some of my wii games

[Feanor_II]

NOD-INFORMER37 wrote...

I actually never played Dragon Age.

How is that series anyway? I heard the first was better than second but other than that I have no idea what its about...

First game is great, specially on PC (mouse & keyboard), the game was designed with PC on mind, later ported to consoles with some serious flaws in terms of combat.

The Sequel is a button smasher with lightened RPG elements, contrary to DA:O this time it was designed for consoles, but combat on XB360 or PS3 is miles away from what you can see in, let's say, God Of War, the port to PC is quite crappy, combat can be terrible!

[naledgeborn]

DA3 yes. DA4 and future installments is still up in the air. It's all dependent on DA2 DLC/Expac and DA3 sales