It's actually extremely easy to prevent him Kal'Reegar from dying. Even on Insanity difficulty I can tell him to fight and still keep him alive.Prince Zeel wrote...
Even now, I'm remembering that Tali recruit missions, where the dude with the Rocket launcher was suppose to flank me. What happened? He has a bloody rocket launcher, yet the moron still dies.
"We've Got the Whole Quarian Fleet Waiting in Orbit."
#26
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:07
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
#27
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:08
I mean, isn't that much obvious?
#28
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:08
Prince Zeel wrote...
Yeahhh okay. The marijuanna haze must be blocking your vision, bog. Why don't you return to your abyss and think of some more "witty" butthurt jokes. I'm sure I haven't heard them all yet.
I never enter a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. In this case, I just used a performance reducing substance to make it fairer for you. Still doesnt make it fair, but at least you have a vague hope of being able to see a glimmer of victory.
@EternalAmbiguity: I was referring to your sig.
#29
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:09
EternalAmbiguity wrote...
Bogsnot1 wrote...
There are several ways to derail topics, just ask EternalAbiguity.
The fact that you never sem to be able to do it with any success, and it takes mere microseconds worth of thought to either refute your pathetic aguments, or even less time to re-troll you, goes to show you are never really on it to begin with.
Not sure what you mean, Bog. Should I be insulted or flattered?
He means you contribute nothing to the dialogue. You only spam. I already pointed this out.
#30
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:10
please don't tell me you got that from rush limbaughBogsnot1 wrote...
Prince Zeel wrote...
Yeahhh okay. The marijuanna haze must be blocking your vision, bog. Why don't you return to your abyss and think of some more "witty" butthurt jokes. I'm sure I haven't heard them all yet.
I never enter a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. In this case, I just used a performance reducing substance to make it fairer for you. Still doesnt make it fair, but at least you have a vague hope of being able to see a glimmer of victory.
@EternalAmbiguity: I was referring to your sig.
#31
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:11
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
You mean people actually look at my sig? That's pretty cool.
Prince Zeel wrote...
EternalAmbiguity wrote...
Bogsnot1 wrote...
There are several ways to derail topics, just ask EternalAbiguity.
The fact that you never sem to be able to do it with any success, and it takes mere microseconds worth of thought to either refute your pathetic aguments, or even less time to re-troll you, goes to show you are never really on it to begin with.
Not sure what you mean, Bog. Should I be insulted or flattered?
He means you contribute nothing to the dialogue. You only spam. I already pointed this out.
Oh Zeel, you're so cute! We talked to much last night for me to ever be offended at you again. Now you just make me lol.
Modifié par EternalAmbiguity, 17 octobre 2011 - 06:12 .
#32
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:11
Cthulhu42 wrote...
It's actually extremely easy to prevent him Kal'Reegar from dying. Even on Insanity difficulty I can tell him to fight and still keep him alive.Prince Zeel wrote...
Even now, I'm remembering that Tali recruit missions, where the dude with the Rocket launcher was suppose to flank me. What happened? He has a bloody rocket launcher, yet the moron still dies.
Bull. I will not believe that. I was just going down the steps, I look back, the dude is dead.
Quarians are weak. The fact that tali fights alongside us, is a clear example of a plot hole.
#33
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:12
You can expect to hear from Priestly and Woo over the next few days.
@Everyone else.
Please do not quote or carry on quoting Prince Zeel's comments. Continue with on topic discussion
#34
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:13
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Believe it or not, it happened. Just because you were unable to do something doesn't mean that the rest of us can't.Prince Zeel wrote...
Cthulhu42 wrote...
It's actually extremely easy to prevent him Kal'Reegar from dying. Even on Insanity difficulty I can tell him to fight and still keep him alive.Prince Zeel wrote...
Even now, I'm remembering that Tali recruit missions, where the dude with the Rocket launcher was suppose to flank me. What happened? He has a bloody rocket launcher, yet the moron still dies.
Bull. I will not believe that. I was just going down the steps, I look back, the dude is dead.
Quarians are weak. The fact that tali fights alongside us, is a clear example of a plot hole.
#35
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:15
Sajuro wrote...
please don't tell me you got that from rush limbaugh
Ive been using that line for longer than cable TV (and thus fox news) has been available in Australia, so no, i didntget it from that right wing nutjob.
#36
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:19
javierabegazo wrote...
@Prince Zeel
You can expect to hear from Priestly and Woo over the next few days.
Thank god
On topic: That sounds pretty rad, I wasn't a huge fan of Quarians at all when I played though ME. After reading the books I kinda warmed up to them. Wish more info about their day-to-day lives was available in game!
#37
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:20
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
Bogsnot1 wrote...
Sajuro wrote...
please don't tell me you got that from rush limbaugh
Ive been using that line for longer than cable TV (and thus fox news) has been available in Australia, so no, i didntget it from that right wing nutjob.
I suddenly feel unique for being a conservative. I don't like Rush, but still...
#38
Guest_aLucidMind_*
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:22
Guest_aLucidMind_*
Thats why I said they're best for cyber-warfare. I think Reeger also says they're best at orbital bombardments, using their ships rather than being a ground force. Being a ground force, like you said, renders them as nothing more than liabilities. Every group has it's weaknesses and strengths, their weakness is being on the front lines. On the ground, they should be considered as a sniper at best and even that is stretching it. Their strength is that they are masters in the technological and mechanical fields.Prince Zeel wrote...
aLucidMind wrote...
Even "liabilities" could be good. At their worst, they could be a good use for a distraction. Best not turn away an actual ally when the galaxy is being purged. Even as a liability (in your opinion), they are still an ally since the two are not mutually dependant. Cyber-warfare is the best way to use the Quarians, though. On the other hand, we don't really know how strong their military actually is. All we know is they've kept good care of ships a few centuries old. A sword from the 1500's can be just as lethal as one made today.Prince Zeel wrote...
Why the hell would Shepard need a bunch of flimsy Quarians to fight the Reapers. I thought we needed allies not liabilities.
A simple puncture in their body suits would send them into seizures Unless this is some sort of military that doesn't use infrantry men, they would be quite useless in the war.
Even now, I'm remembering that Tali recruit missions, where the dude with the Rocket launcher was suppose to flank me. What happened? He has a bloody rocket launcher, yet the moron still dies.
Useless, utterly.
Even as a distraction, I can see them failing at it.
#39
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:27
#40
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:30
Eh, one's political stance has little to no bearing on his or her intelligence or character.EternalAmbiguity wrote...
I suddenly feel unique for being a conservative. I don't like Rush, but still...
Seriously, I'd rather be in a room full of smart, nice people that I completely disagree with than a bunch of pricks that share my views.
I've been in both situations, and they're both uncomfortable as all hell, but boy let me tell you, the worst kind of dirtbag is the one that shares your political stance but for all the wrong reasons.
#41
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:31
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nortraship
apply that concept to the quarian navy and we have a gamechanger on our hands.
#42
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:34
Since when did that annoying piece of filth pull a Jesus?Gh0st_00 wrote...
You could mention that Tali should stay behind to 'distract' the reaper while everyone else escapes....
She wouldn't last long, but that's not the point.
#43
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:35
EternalAmbiguity wrote...
I suddenly feel unique for being a conservative. I don't like Rush, but still...
If its any consolation, I hate left wing nutjobs just as much as I hate right wing nutjobs.
I feel that being a nutjob should transcend politics.
#44
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:38
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Oh great, we eliminated one troll, and another appears. They breed like rabbits.Kasai666 wrote...
Since when did that annoying piece of filth pull a Jesus?Gh0st_00 wrote...
You could mention that Tali should stay behind to 'distract' the reaper while everyone else escapes....
She wouldn't last long, but that's not the point.
#45
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:41
Didn't mean to come off trollish, but I dont like Tali. She is useful on only a few missions, I am not a fan of Quarians and their attitude of the Geth and her voice is irritating.Cthulhu42 wrote...
Oh great, we eliminated one troll, and another appears. They breed like rabbits.Kasai666 wrote...
Since when did that annoying piece of filth pull a Jesus?Gh0st_00 wrote...
You could mention that Tali should stay behind to 'distract' the reaper while everyone else escapes....
She wouldn't last long, but that's not the point.
Modifié par Kasai666, 17 octobre 2011 - 06:44 .
#46
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:42
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
AdmiralCheez wrote...
Eh, one's political stance has little to no bearing on his or her intelligence or character.
Seriously, I'd rather be in a room full of smart, nice people that I completely disagree with than a bunch of pricks that share my views.
I've been in both situations, and they're both uncomfortable as all hell, but boy let me tell you, the worst kind of dirtbag is the one that shares your political stance but for all the wrong reasons.
I agree.
Bogsnot1 wrote...
If its any consolation, I hate left wing nutjobs just as much as I hate right wing nutjobs.
I feel that being a nutjob should transcend politics. [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/ninja.png[/smilie]
Roger, nutjobs are nutjobs.
#47
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:45
I mean, having 50,000 ships in 1 fleet is not exactly a good idea.
Quarians most certainly have many fleets, just that is commonly said those 50k ships are Quarian fleet.
#48
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:45
- make someone drop shield, pull, warp and detonate...
- make someone drop shield, pull, warp and detonate...
- make someone drop shield, pull, warp and detonate...
- make someone drop shield, pull, warp and detonate...
- make someone drop shield, pull, warp and detonate...
- make someone drop shield, pull, warp and detonate...
- make someone drop shield, pull, warp and detonate...
- make someone drop shield, pull, warp and detonate...
- make someone drop shield, pull, warp and detonate...
...
Modifié par Dariuszp, 17 octobre 2011 - 06:45 .
#49
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:47
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Well, you're entitled to your opinions, but "annoying piece of filth" is definitely going too far.Kasai666 wrote...
Didn't mean to come off trollish, but I dont like Tali. She is usful on only a few missions, I am not a fan of quarians and their attitude of the Geth and her voice is irritating.Cthulhu42 wrote...
Oh great, we eliminated one troll, and another appears. They breed like rabbits.Kasai666 wrote...
Since when did that annoying piece of filth pull a Jesus?Gh0st_00 wrote...
You could mention that Tali should stay behind to 'distract' the reaper while everyone else escapes....
She wouldn't last long, but that's not the point.
That being said, I look forward to fighting with the quarians in ME3. Regardless of what the haters think, they're going to end up being useful.
#50
Posté 17 octobre 2011 - 06:48
Mesina2 wrote...
Shepard probably meant 1 Quarian fleet.
I mean, having 50,000 ships in 1 fleet is not exactly a good idea.
Quarians most certainly have many fleets, just that is commonly said those 50k ships are Quarian fleet.
I'd hate to imagine the logistics of parking 50,000 ships in orbit over a planet
Modifié par Hathur, 17 octobre 2011 - 06:48 .





Retour en haut







