Someone With Mass wrote...
SNascimento wrote...
.
So, the Geth showing up in a planet under their control is unexpected? I don't think so. And in a operation, you blame who is in charge.
.
But I do agree that there are some things that are out of contro. This, and Freedom Progress were not this kind of situation though.
.
I think Tali in a battlefield situation reflects the Quarians perfectly, they just don't have the resources to get the job done.
Okay, tell me how a geth patrol spotting them is their fault.
Tali is also remarkably good in battle against synthetic enemies and when it comes to distractions. She also got the job done. She figured out why Haestrom's sun was dying faster than usual, which was the whole goal with her mission there.
.
How is it not her fault? You in a planet controled by the Geth, so you have to go under cover. But you are spotted. How can this not be your fault?
.
And I agree what really matters in the end is getting the job done, but does she? It's really not up to Tali succeeding or not in those missions, it's up to Shepard. In Freedon's Progress you decide if she get Victor or not and in Haestrom she only gets out of there if you go rescue her, which you can not do.
.
We can easily nail three facts in this debate:
.
1) There are two missions that Tali is in charge, Freedon's Progess and Haestrom. In both she doesn't control the outcome. (Shepard does)
2) Miranda and The Shadow Broker make remarks how Tali is a lesser leader.
3) She can't lead a group in the SM.
.
So, if you really are a Tali's fan, the better you can do is say she is a ok leader, but she is nothing close to Garrus or Miranda, for exemple.
.
And I'm trying to make a point here that this isn't about Tali as an individual, but about the Quarians as a race. When was the last major fight they had in land? When did we see a good Quarian operative? They just don't have the resources to be effective outside the Migrant Fleet.
Modifié par SNascimento, 18 octobre 2011 - 10:50 .