thats1evildude wrote...
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
I hated having to kill all of the Mabari in the game. Why Bioware why?!?!
Oh yeah, geez, BW! Give us construct dogs or hell hounds or something! Just stop making me have to kill mabari; that pitiful whining when I stab the poor doggies is killing me!
:crying:
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
jlb524 wrote...
A good thief should make sure all bases are covered, have multiple escape plans, make sure the Duke's vicious (I think Leopold's just tragically mis-understood, though) pet is ill just in case the unforeseen happens.
No, a good player should.
Zjarcal wrote...
We should start a group asking for hell hounds in DA3. [smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/wizard.png[/smilie]
Modifié par jlb524, 17 octobre 2011 - 07:23 .
jlb524 wrote...
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
jlb524 wrote...
A good thief should make sure all bases are covered, have multiple escape plans, make sure the Duke's vicious (I think Leopold's just tragically mis-understood, though) pet is ill just in case the unforeseen happens.
No, a good player should.
Why shouldn't Hawke do the same?
Ramante wrote...
In the playthrough that I poisoned the food I had Leopold (and the Duke) fall almost of the cliff halfway through the battle, gave my party the option to hit them hard without them fighting back. they crawled back onto the platform but it cost them a lot of health.
Modifié par thats1evildude, 17 octobre 2011 - 07:28 .
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
Because the PC isn't aware of enough to reasonably anticipate the contingencies that would necessitate such advance planning.
Gervaise wrote...
I didn't really like poisoning Leopold's food - after all it's not his he is owned by the Duke but I did have the feeling that if we got the relic that I thought we were after, that may be he might use Leopold as a sort of gigantic blood hound to track us down, so it seemed expedient to slow him up a bit. Thinking back, he didn't seem as sharp in the second fight as the first time round so may be that was it. For preference I would rather have seen Prosper go straight over the cliff and been able to rescue and liberate poor Leopold but I guess he was devoted to his master in his own way so wouldn't have appreciated the gesture. Forget the scroll, Prosper is monumentally stupid if he hadn't realised that he had a great secret weapon living on his property - not the most tractible of beasts but they are trainable and large. But who knows, may be a future game will see a cavalry of wyvern riders.
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
My issue with this was that there was no reason to poison the food without the meta-game knowledge that you'd have to fight Leopold at some point. The PC has way of knowing that, so poisoning Leopold is really just a pretty dick move.
Just played this DLC a couple of times in the past week. My Hawke is fully prepared to make Leopold sickly. Face it- you're already there to steal something- if that isn't a dick move I don't know what is. So while my Hawke is generally agreeable and takes the high road whenever feasible she's faced with having to raise enough gold to get into the expedition to make her mark for her family. Tallis mentions several times how incredibly fortified/guarded Duke Prosper's property is- it only makes sense for my Hawke to consider hmmm a whole legion of guards and there's this harnessed pet Wyvern. Let's make sure that doesn't bite us in the ass later. As for pity for Leopold- he's collateral unfortunately- just like all the Ghasts that decide to accost my crew 
I haven't read all the posts here but you are supposed to get 10 seconds of sluggish wyvern. Huzzah!
Retour en haut
