Confess-A-Bear wrote...
^ lol Wut?
Are you asking the part about skyrim or Dragon's Dogma in that comment?
If it was the Skyrim part, to be fair, the writing wasn't that great. Even the main plot was a bit mediocre, imo.
Confess-A-Bear wrote...
^ lol Wut?
Modifié par M U P P 3 T Z, 21 mai 2012 - 10:20 .
M U P P 3 T Z wrote...
Am I the only one that thinks the dragon's voice doesn't match the model? I guess I expected the stereotypical deep, raspy voice or something, rather than just a regular dude voice.
M U P P 3 T Z wrote...
@TNT1991: I think the writing for DD is going to be below Skyrim, even. It is Capcom we're talking about.. haha. I think the fun of the game will be in wandering around and killing s***.
Confess-A-Bear wrote...
namely at skyrim. I don't see DD being any better really, if the OXM review is right its really not worth mentioning.
Modifié par TNT1991, 21 mai 2012 - 10:53 .
Modifié par horacethegrey, 21 mai 2012 - 10:49 .
Guest_Logan Cloud_*
Guest_jollyorigins_*
Modifié par M U P P 3 T Z, 21 mai 2012 - 11:20 .
Rockworm503 wrote...
Decent scores but I'm looking forward to hearing what Angry Joe has to say about all this.
OF course no matter what he says I'm not touching this game until the "not ripping you off by charging your for what should've been there to begin with" edition.
Story= forgettable (-) dragons (+)
Gameplay= Useful pawns (+), deliberate exploration(+), epic boss battles(+)
presentation= "Japan Fantasy"(+), spell effects(+), sound and visual blemishes(-)
Modifié par TNT1991, 22 mai 2012 - 01:50 .
Ghost Lightning wrote...
Gametrailers review just got posted.
Story - 6
Design - 8.8
Gameplay - 9
Presentation - 8
Overall - 8.7
This erases most of my apprehension.
Modifié par Hellbound555, 22 mai 2012 - 09:35 .
Guest_jollyorigins_*
Modifié par M U P P 3 T Z, 22 mai 2012 - 03:13 .