348 réponses à ce sujet

[Doctalen]

Huh, Lot's of stuff I did not know. Pretty excited for it now.

[rallyfan]

I support bots! Please add this bioware!

[Ghost-621]

 Hey guys! I have 45 MINUTES OF ME3 MULTIPLAYER GAMEPLAY!

[Doctalen]

Ghost-621 wrote...

 Hey guys! I have 45 MINUTES OF ME3 MULTIPLAYER GAMEPLAY!

Yeah, I called it Horde 2.0. I am a gears fan and when you say it's survival with objectives that's what my mind goes to. Well played though. I wasn't saying that Mass effect copied it. The first survival mode that I know of is from the first AvP game so Gears and everyone else took that idea from them unless it was around before that. Sorry for drawing a comparison. 

Modifié par Doctalen, 09 janvier 2012 - 06:32 .

[Ghost-621]

Doctalen wrote...

Ghost-621 wrote...

 Hey guys! I have 45 MINUTES OF ME3 MULTIPLAYER GAMEPLAY!

Yeah, I called it Horde 2.0. I am a gears fan and when you say it's survival with objectives that's what my mind goes to. Well played though. I wasn't saying that Mass effect copied it. The first survival mode that I know of is from the first AvP game so Gears and everyone else took that idea from them unless it was around before that. Sorry for drawing a comparison. 

Wait, that was from Gear of War 3? 

An honest mistake, I honestly thought it was Mass Effect 3's Galaxy at War! It's amazing how...similar they are!

[Doctalen]

Ghost-621 wrote...

Doctalen wrote...

Ghost-621 wrote...

 Hey guys! I have 45 MINUTES OF ME3 MULTIPLAYER GAMEPLAY!

Yeah, I called it Horde 2.0. I am a gears fan and when you say it's survival with objectives that's what my mind goes to. Well played though. I wasn't saying that Mass effect copied it. The first survival mode that I know of is from the first AvP game so Gears and everyone else took that idea from them unless it was around before that. Sorry for drawing a comparison. 

Wait, that was from Gear of War 3? 

An honest mistake, I honestly thought it was Mass Effect 3's Galaxy at War! It's amazing how...similar they are!

The idea of survival with objectives is where I draw the comparison. Not gameplay. 

[Ghost-621]

Doctalen wrote...

Ghost-621 wrote...

Doctalen wrote...

Ghost-621 wrote...

 Hey guys! I have 45 MINUTES OF ME3 MULTIPLAYER GAMEPLAY!

Yeah, I called it Horde 2.0. I am a gears fan and when you say it's survival with objectives that's what my mind goes to. Well played though. I wasn't saying that Mass effect copied it. The first survival mode that I know of is from the first AvP game so Gears and everyone else took that idea from them unless it was around before that. Sorry for drawing a comparison. 

Wait, that was from Gear of War 3? 

An honest mistake, I honestly thought it was Mass Effect 3's Galaxy at War! It's amazing how...similar they are!

The idea of survival with objectives is where I draw the comparison. Not gameplay. 

See, I was fooled! I have watched the MP demo gameplay, all of it. It looked and played almost exactly like Gears of War 3 Horde 2.0! Wow, was I fooled!

[argonian persona]

I support no multiplayer whatsoever. What an absolute waste of time and resources. It's existence takes away from not only the feel of the game, but Shepard's characterization.

The reason multiplayer exists is due to an EA mandate. Anyone who denies this fact is very naive, unfortunately.

The tacked on, lame and unneeded multiplayer will be dead in three months. Tops.

[Ghost-621]

PDesign wrote...

Ghost-621 wrote...

 Hey guys! I have 45 MINUTES OF ME3 MULTIPLAYER GAMEPLAY!

It's actually better. ME3 Co-op is slow and boring, in the beta at least.

So..you're telling me that Bioware can't even ripoff another game's feature correctly? 

[RAF1940]

argonian persona wrote...
The tacked on, lame and unneeded multiplayer will be dead in three months. Tops.

Unfortunately, this is likely true.

I can't see anyone besides serious ME fans putting real time into it.

[Commander N44]

 well in my opinion bots for the multiplayer would be epic...those who say that is not a good idea or that it consumes resources and time listen to this....the game was expected to be realeased on december 2011...but they decided to delay it for improvement on graphics,gameplay,multiplayer and combat system...in a recent search bots for multiplayer is going to be a second priority if they can put the same mechanics of single player to that of multiplayer...so yea  there will be bots for multiplayer no matter what the opinions or comments...we are nobody to judge the way the game is developed...and yes there is a reason and a strong base to support the idea of bots for multiplayer...if you say that it is a bad idea it means that you do not support call of duty black ops bots. the fans asks for bots in multiplayer...the fans demands to be bots for multiplayer...is up to bioware montreal to chose to if there is bots or will not be in the multiplayer...in another quote im very familiar with the mechanics of AI controlled bots...and from my experience i can say that bots in multiplayer(for mass effect at least) is an easy delopment and not a waste of time, resources,money. but as and fan of mass effect i say....PUT SOME GODDAMN BOTS FOR MULTIPLAYER BIOWARE!!!!

[Commander N44]

  well in my opinion bots for the multiplayer would be epic...those who say that is not a good idea or that it consumes resources and time listen to this....the game was expected to be realeased on december 2011...but they decided to delay it for improvement on graphics,gameplay,multiplayer and combat system...in a recent search bots for multiplayer is going to be a second priority if they can put the same mechanics of single player to that of multiplayer...so yea  there will be bots for multiplayer no matter what the opinions or comments...we are nobody to judge the way the game is developed...and yes there is a reason and a strong base to support the idea of bots for multiplayer...if you say that it is a bad idea it means that you do not support call of duty black ops bots. the fans asks for bots in multiplayer...the fans demands to be bots for multiplayer...is up to bioware montreal to chose to if there is bots or will not be in the multiplayer...in another quote im very familiar with the mechanics of AI controlled bots...and from my experience i can say that bots in multiplayer(for mass effect at least) is an easy delopment and not a waste of time, resources,money. but as and fan of mass effect i say....PUT SOME GODDAMN BOTS FOR MULTIPLAYER BIOWARE!!!!

[ediskrad327]

argonian persona wrote...

waste of time and resources

did you know it's another team developing the multiplayer?

[Commander N44]

well in my opinion bots for the multiplayer would be epic...those who say that is not a good idea or that it consumes resources and time listen to this....the game was expected to be realeased on december 2011...but they decided to delay it for improvement on graphics,gameplay,multiplayer and combat system...in a recent search bots for multiplayer is going to be a second priority if they can put the same mechanics of single player to that of multiplayer...so yea there will be bots for multiplayer no matter what the opinions or comments...we are nobody to judge the way the game is developed...and yes there is a reason and a strong base to support the idea of bots for multiplayer...if you say that it is a bad idea it means that you do not support call of duty black ops bots. the fans asks for bots in multiplayer...the fans demands to be bots for multiplayer...is up to bioware montreal to chose to if there is bots or will not be in the multiplayer...in another quote im very familiar with the mechanics of AI controlled bots...and from my experience i can say that bots in multiplayer(for mass effect at least) is an easy delopment and not a waste of time, resources,money. but as and fan of mass effect i say....PUT SOME GODDAMN BOTS FOR MULTIPLAYER BIOWARE!!!!

[Apocsapel91]

Bumping for support.

[Homey C-Dawg]

Hey I remember this thread.

I still support bots in multiplayer.

[mkk316]

ediskrad327 wrote...

argonian persona wrote...

waste of time and resources

did you know it's another team developing the multiplayer?

Dont bother, he'll just ignore your attempt at reasoning.

[shenlonzero]

the bots idea is not bad as long as they aren't able to be used in importing. if you create the bots especially. only characters listed to have never been bots should be imported.

[Storm Farron]

please give us bots

[No Snakes Alive]

I def support bots.



And splitscreen. >=|

[Gwolf14]

GIVE US BOTS OR GIVE US DEATH....OF ME3 MULTIPLAYER. Sorry couldn't myself, but bots pwease with sugar on top. Perfect dark and Golden Eye made bots epic and I demand bots. I am a hermit who lives on a mountain and therefore have no need of online multiplayer, just bots.

[Silc]

BUMP for supporting bots. Sometimes i like to play by myself - of course i can solo but im not rally good in solo mode. With bots, it helps.

[Zjarcal]

I would support this.

While I do have readily available friends to play, it would be really nice to have bot support like in other team based multiplayer games, like Counter Strike.

It would also help out to fill out empty slots so that in case there aren't four players available, the team still gets a decent chance at succeeding.

[Giggles_Manically]

Bots would be a welcome addition.