sympathyforsaren wrote...
Ah yes....and this is the other phenomenon I pointed out earlier....the same people who worship BioWare
Seeing as it is generally not considered a good thing to argue with deities, and as many people know, I have openly criticized two BioWare employees (Which I regret, they are just people trying to do their jobs), I'd say that I am, according to you, about to receive a sacred thunderbolt to the buttocks.
and always post on BSN high-fiving each other
This is indeed a great compliment to be recieving from the masters of the ancient art of circlejerking.
and resorting to immature insults that is actually trolling but mods would never get the likes of Phaedon in trouble (or simply held accountable at a fair and equitable standard compared to others) thinking that because they post in here all of the time they are the majority and speak consensus for everybody in existence.
Well, while on the one hand, it is very intriguing to be accused of such stuff from the guy, who when called out on his repeated attacks on shooter fans replied "Or I can do whatever the f*ck I want, how does that sound?" (with impunity, at that), I do have to remind you that, I hold the record of "locked threads in a row without trolling, which happens to be 4, more than Smuddy's in fact.
It is a very honourable distinction, and I am very disappointed at how much it ruffles your feathers.
Multiplayer looking mighty tacky there, Phaedon, unless these sources you deem as viable for other confirmed content is all of a sudden moot.
Some of these sources, including IGN, share our direct opinion, with an attempt to be unbiased for journalistic reasons. But I'm not crying....I'm giving a wait and see approach and have ME3's best interests in mind. I also 'uninvested' money in the game and am waiting.
Your "direct opinion" is bollocks until you play the demo in January, right now, it is diabetes-inducing tears and further lovely unbased generalizations.
BG also had co-op, but of course, no! That's
different.Or maybe BG was a GoW-inspired third person shooter? Hmm, I don't know which sounds less silly, to be honest.
I would gladly post some "sources" that you might like, but the possibility of being reported by 5 to 6 different people on the grounds of "personal attack" is not something I am willing to risk over a typical post of yours.
It's obvious more than ever that multiplayer, of course, doesn't belong in ME3. Unless you want to complain to every source that belittled it and basically said folks like myself have a legitimate gripe.
No, folks like you don't have a legitimate gripe at all. You have the logic of a beheaded chicken.
You haven't played the co-op mode, and even if you dislike it, I assumed that you weren't interested in it enough to care? Which definitely allows you just to ignore it completely.
The reviewers had reportedly 10 minutes or so to check the co-op and their impressions are quite mixed overall (Compare Game Informer to IGN, etc). What remains is to play the demo on January, or wait until March for the impressions of the same journalists after several hours of gameplay, on the final product.
Co-op doesn't belong to ME3?
You mean, co-op isn't necessary in ME3, surely, because that other statement is utterly retarded. While unecessary by itself, and although I would have much preferred an offline "Terrorist Hunt" of sorts, it definitely provides a couple of advantages. For one, I'll be able to play this awesome game with friends, or even fellow forumites, and it also contributes to providing the real scale of the war. Unlike, the major Eden Prime War conflict and ME1, which handled it more poorely than a tightwadish anthropomorphic duck who wears a top hat.
Retour en haut
