Aller au contenu

Photo

Mass Effect 3 Development Decisions


280 réponses à ce sujet

#101
BeefoTheBold

BeefoTheBold
  • Members
  • 957 messages

leonia42 wrote...

BeefoTheBold wrote...

leonia42 wrote...

So ME3 is also by Bioware. If your criteria is "Bioware label" and not "Traditional old-school RPG" then you should still buy it. RPGs have been changing for years and if you don't like those changes, that's fine but you can't expect Bioware to keep producing the same identical product every time. The industry would gobble them up if they kept that up. But to deny that ME3 has RPG elements is to ignore a LOT of information we've been given. Maybe it doesn't suit your personal definition of RPG but I bet very few games do any more. Either you accept the changes and play it (there will still be great story and all the things you normally expect from Bioware) or you give Bioware the finger and ride away on your RPG Elitist horse.


Oh?

CD Projekt doesn't seem to be being swallowed up.

Rather they seem to have said, "You don't want this segment of the industry Bioware? We'll definitely take it!"

They seem to be doing just fine.


I like my stories and characters to be a bit deeper than those presented in the Witcher but hey we all have different tastes. They've not made as many games as Bioware either so the metric is hardly comparable. But if you want to distort facts to support your paranoia, by all means go ahead.


If you want to throw out an assertion utterly not backed by the facts go ahead.

The Witcher's storyline, which is STRONGLY INFLUENCED by player choice, is definitely at least as deep as Mass Effect's.

And we're not giving out a lifetime achievement award. We're talking about the present. Lifetime achievement, Bioware definitely wins out over CD Projekt.

Who's making the better RPGs CURRENTLY? It's CD Projekt and it isn't even close.

#102
DiebytheSword

DiebytheSword
  • Members
  • 4 109 messages

BeefoTheBold wrote...

DiebytheSword wrote...
  Nothing stops you, or any other playing from RPing during the event other than you won't have a dialogue wheel, you'll need to use your mouth.


I never realized that games like Gears of War, Uncharted, Call of Duty, Rainbow Six, Halo, etc. were all RPGs in disguise given that nothing was stopping the 14 year old screaming the N word on the phone from RPing during the session!

Yes, you're right. Simply saying that people CAN RP if they want TOGETHER obviously means that ALL MP is RP based at heart. :wub:

*sips tea*

Yes, it all becomes so clear in the light of your patronizing wisdom.

Your rebuttal is logically flawed - even setting aside your condescension - because you are trying to say that nothing is PREVENTING a group of people from deciding to have an impromptu D&D session over the lan line while they gun down hordes of spawning enemies ala Dragon Age 2.

By that logic, ANY game with an online coop is an RPG.

Otherwise, no, you're essentially an identity lacking Master Chief shooting an identity lacking alien.


It was a condoscending as it needed to be, you made blanket moronic statments concerning multiplayer games that were blatantly false. Also, I've never, not once, disagreed with your assertion that it isn't RPG enough, I agreed there.  I only pointed out a possible way for you to have meaningful conversations with your squadmates.

Sadly, I'm too COD for that, apparently.

Actually I'm from the camp of people that says that you can RP anytime, anywhere, game be damned.  I can RP on a bus, a train.  On a dock floating on a lake.  By your immense, bloated straw man, the D&D game held at my dining room table cannot be an RPG, because it has multiple people!  It cannot be co-op because it has combat!

Glad you sorted that out for me.  I thought I was having a deep RPG experience.  But the moment one of those wiley PC's wanders off and does something else, they aren't part of my single player story experience anymore.  Boohoo!  I hate this game.

Now lets break this laughable shclock down:

I also take issue with your argument that it fits within the story. Once again, it all boils down to whether you are making an incredibly tenuous connection that any fifth grader can see through or whether or not you are TRULY INCORPORATING WHAT IS HAPPENING into the storyline.

Sure you can toss out a one-liner, "BTW, you're fighting a horde of bad guys that Shepard's too busy to personally gun down. After all, there are millions of bad guys and only one Shepard." Technically, yes, that is tying the MP into the story.

It's also complete crap.

Tying the MP into the story necessitates WRITING MORE STORY. In other words, it requires more than, "Here's a different group of gun toting idiots. Shoot them." It actually needs to say what the tie is, how this is effecting Shepard, the motivations of whomever your character is shooting them down, etc.


Did you get and advance copy of ME3 that I don't know about?  Does it load with "Call of Mass Effect: No Company" at the start screen and proceed to throw you at things without any context?  I believe you know the context good sir, you're actually too smart not too. (yes, that's a compliment)

Based only on what is said and shown, the story is simple but present.  Admiral Hackett (oh dear, a character, stories must be about!) orders these groups into battle to secure objectives.  It may not be fun playing the grunt on the fetch quest for you, but that does not make it storyless.  It has wooden actors who don't want to speak, and it has no discernable character development, but it does have a protagonist, a plot, an antagonist, and presumably a climax, and a resolution.  That makes it a story, whether you hate that story or not is irrelevant.  This is not a stretch, it is a stretch to say there is no story.

Now, back to your flawed understanding of what co-op means?  Did you have a rebuttal to that, or are you still wrong?

As a final comment, I will apologize for being a bit too rough on the sarcasm and condoscendence.  I was in a bad mood and did take it out on you a bit.  My point is this, you grossly misunderstand what the MP experience is about, and mischaracterized co-op play.  I will reiterate that I do think more RPG elements in co-op would have gone a long way to making people happy, myself one of them.

Modifié par DiebytheSword, 28 octobre 2011 - 02:40 .


#103
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages
I actually hate "pure" RPGs and could care less about the Witcher series.

Oh ho ho yes.

#104
Ricinator

Ricinator
  • Members
  • 446 messages

AdmiralCheez wrote...

I actually hate "pure" RPGs and could care less about the Witcher series.

Oh ho ho yes.


makes sense you didn't play alot of ME1

#105
slimgrin

slimgrin
  • Members
  • 12 481 messages

AdmiralCheez wrote...

I actually hate "pure" RPGs and could care less about the Witcher series.

Oh ho ho yes.


Bioware would do well to borrow some of the chutzpah CDPR has. It would help to steer them out of the 'we can appeal to everyone' phallacy.

#106
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages

Ricinator wrote...

makes sense you didn't play alot of ME1

I've actually completed five playthroughs (twice with one character), and I plan on doing it plenty more.  I love ME1.

Can't imagine the combat without shooting, though.

#107
C9316

C9316
  • Members
  • 5 638 messages

AdmiralCheez wrote...

I actually hate "pure" RPGs and could care less about the Witcher series.

Oh ho ho yes.

It's dangerous to go alone! Take this!

http://t1.gstatic.co..._651eG88sdXbwbf

#108
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages

slimgrin wrote...

Bioware would do well to borrow some of the chutzpah CDPR has. It would help to steer them out of the 'we can appeal to everyone' phallacy.

I dunno, I kind of like the whole hybrid thing Mass Effect has going.

#109
BeefoTheBold

BeefoTheBold
  • Members
  • 957 messages

DiebytheSword wrote...

BeefoTheBold wrote...

DiebytheSword wrote...
  Nothing stops you, or any other playing from RPing during the event other than you won't have a dialogue wheel, you'll need to use your mouth.


I never realized that games like Gears of War, Uncharted, Call of Duty, Rainbow Six, Halo, etc. were all RPGs in disguise given that nothing was stopping the 14 year old screaming the N word on the phone from RPing during the session!

Yes, you're right. Simply saying that people CAN RP if they want TOGETHER obviously means that ALL MP is RP based at heart. :wub:

*sips tea*

Yes, it all becomes so clear in the light of your patronizing wisdom.

Your rebuttal is logically flawed - even setting aside your condescension - because you are trying to say that nothing is PREVENTING a group of people from deciding to have an impromptu D&D session over the lan line while they gun down hordes of spawning enemies ala Dragon Age 2.

By that logic, ANY game with an online coop is an RPG.

Otherwise, no, you're essentially an identity lacking Master Chief shooting an identity lacking alien.


It was a condoscending as it needed to be, you made blanket moronic statments concerning multiplayer games that were blatantly false. Also, I've never, not once, disagreed with your assertion that it isn't RPG enough, I agreed there.  I only pointed out a possible way for you to have meaningful conversations with your squadmates.

Sadly, I'm too COD for that, apparently.

Actually I'm from the camp of people that says that you can RP anytime, anywhere, game be damned.  I can RP on a bus, a train.  On a dock floating on a lake.  By your immense, bloated straw man, the D&D game held at my dining room table cannot be an RPG, because it has multiple people!  It cannot be co-op because it has combat!

Glad you sorted that out for me.  I thought I was having a deep RPG experience.  But the moment one of those wiley PC's wanders off and does something else, they aren't part of my single player story experience anymore.  Boohoo!  I hate this game.

Now lets break this laughable shclock down:

I also take issue with your argument that it fits within the story. Once again, it all boils down to whether you are making an incredibly tenuous connection that any fifth grader can see through or whether or not you are TRULY INCORPORATING WHAT IS HAPPENING into the storyline.

Sure you can toss out a one-liner, "BTW, you're fighting a horde of bad guys that Shepard's too busy to personally gun down. After all, there are millions of bad guys and only one Shepard." Technically, yes, that is tying the MP into the story.

It's also complete crap.

Tying the MP into the story necessitates WRITING MORE STORY. In other words, it requires more than, "Here's a different group of gun toting idiots. Shoot them." It actually needs to say what the tie is, how this is effecting Shepard, the motivations of whomever your character is shooting them down, etc.


Did you get and advance copy of ME3 that I don't know about?  Does it load with "Call of Mass Effect: No Company" at the start screen and proceed to throw you at things without any context?  I believe you know the context good sir, you're actually to smart not too.

Based only on what is said and shown, the story is simple but present.  Admiral Hackett (oh dear, a character, stories must be about!) orders these groups into battle to secure objectives.  It may not be fun playing the grunt on the fetch quest for you, but that does not make it storyless.  It has wooden actors who don't want to speak, and it has no discernable character development, but it does have a protagonist, a plot, an antagonist, and presumably a climax, and a resolution.  That makes it a story, whether you hate that story or not is irrelevant.  This is not a stretch, it is a stretch to say there is no story.

Now, back to your flawed understanding of what co-op means?  Did you have a rebuttal to that, or are you still wrong?

As a final comment, I will apologize for being a bit too rough on the sarcasm and condoscendence.  I was in a bad mood and did take it out on you a bit.  My point is this, you grossly misunderstand what the MP experience is about, and mischaracterized co-op play.  I will reiterate that I do think more RPG elements in co-op would have gone a long way to making people happy, myself one of them.


So...to apologize for your sarcasm and condescenion you write a post laced with both and say, "Oh and I didn't mean it" at the end and I apologize?"

You've spent a lot of time talking about definitions. You may want to spend a few minutes looking up how an apology works. Generally... it flows a little different than this:

1. You're an idiot
2. And an ****
3. But I'm sorry that you're an idiot and an ****. I only pointed it out because I'm in a bad mood.

Now, I'm just an assholish idiot, but I'm seeing something wrong with your logic there. Must be me.

To your points:

Basically you're saying that if it isn't IMPOSSIBLE to RP, then the game is an RPG. This is a weak argument to me because while, yes, it is technically possible to have a great, story driven and immersive RP under any circumstances, the actual likelihood gets increasingly remote and lower quality under certain circumstances.

I went to a college football game with my wife on Saturday. Technically, she and I could have slipped into our table-top RPG characters and had an impromptu roleplay. Realistically, that was impossible with 33K screaming fans all around us.

Games like Gears of War aren't called RPGs for a reason: They ARE NOT RPGs. Making a Mass Effect game MORE LIKE Gears of War makes it LESS OF an RPG.

DiebytheSword
It may not be fun playing the grunt on the fetch quest for you, but that
does not make it storyless.  It has wooden actors who don't want to
speak, and it has no discernable character development, but it does have
a protagonist, a plot, an antagonist, and presumably a climax, and a
resolution.  That makes it a story, whether you hate that story or not
is irrelevant.  This is not a stretch, it is a stretch to say there is
no story.


Forgive me if I was unclear. I didn't mean to be confusing.

I wanted a GOOD RPG. Not a crap one. Everything you say describes a crap one. And hence, my original argument about how adding in MP and Kinect elements leads to crap RPG.

Stop me if I'm going too fast for you. Sorry if I'm condescending. I'm in a bad mood because you have treated me like an idiot who's too dumb to realize what you're doing in your previous post. If you weren't doing that, I'd be responding to you like I did Jeff and Isaac.

Modifié par BeefoTheBold, 28 octobre 2011 - 02:49 .


#110
Ricinator

Ricinator
  • Members
  • 446 messages
@admiralcheez
nobody is suggesting to get rid of combat...

#111
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*

Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
  • Guests
So...what is this thread about? I read the OP, it doesn't look like that's being discussed.

#112
C9316

C9316
  • Members
  • 5 638 messages

EternalAmbiguity wrote...

So...what is this thread about? I read the OP, it doesn't look like that's being discussed.

Standard RPG elitists vs Pro-RPG/TPS fans...

#113
Ricinator

Ricinator
  • Members
  • 446 messages
@eternalambiguity
its about the development of mass effect 3 through decisions Bioware has introduced... good or bad pick your side

#114
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages

slimgrin wrote...

AdmiralCheez wrote...

I actually hate "pure" RPGs and could care less about the Witcher series.

Oh ho ho yes.


Bioware would do well to borrow some of the chutzpah CDPR has. It would help to steer them out of the 'we can appeal to everyone' phallacy.


Yeah, and turn Mass Effect into Dragon Age with guns. That'd be so much fun.

Is there some kind of contract somewhere that says BioWare must only make RPG games?

Because I found Mass Effect to be an enjoyable combination between RPG and shooter, since I've seen so many generic RPG games at that point it wasn't even funny.

Fantasy setting, magic and mana, orcs, elves, swords and arrows, fetch quests in dark dungeons filled with monsters and all that crap.

Been there, done that.

#115
111987

111987
  • Members
  • 3 758 messages
Isn't this like, your third/fourth thread on how much you dislike multiplayer and wish it was gone?

Just get over it. Wait for reviews, or don't get the game. It's pretty simple. Your incessant whining changes nothing.

#116
Ricinator

Ricinator
  • Members
  • 446 messages
@c9316
answers like that make you lose a lot of credibility.... if you had any to begin with Gears pansy

#117
BeefoTheBold

BeefoTheBold
  • Members
  • 957 messages

111987 wrote...

Isn't this like, your third/fourth thread on how much you dislike multiplayer and wish it was gone?

Just get over it. Wait for reviews, or don't get the game. It's pretty simple. Your incessant whining changes nothing.


Third thread. It took some effort to get a thread that the mods would allow to stay open.

And your advice is so brilliant that I'm amazed I didn't think of it!

The thought of NOT GETTING THE GAME never crossed my mind. NEVER! Seriously! HOOOOONESTLY!

#118
BeefoTheBold

BeefoTheBold
  • Members
  • 957 messages

Ricinator wrote...

@eternalambiguity
its about the development of mass effect 3 through decisions Bioware has introduced... good or bad pick your side


Thank you.

Very much.

#119
111987

111987
  • Members
  • 3 758 messages

BeefoTheBold wrote...

111987 wrote...

Isn't this like, your third/fourth thread on how much you dislike multiplayer and wish it was gone?

Just get over it. Wait for reviews, or don't get the game. It's pretty simple. Your incessant whining changes nothing.


Third thread. It took some effort to get a thread that the mods would allow to stay open.

And your advice is so brilliant that I'm amazed I didn't think of it!

The thought of NOT GETTING THE GAME never crossed my mind. NEVER! Seriously! HOOOOONESTLY!


Then don't get the game, and move on with your life.

#120
RocketPropelledGrenade

RocketPropelledGrenade
  • Members
  • 7 messages

111987 wrote...

BeefoTheBold wrote...

111987 wrote...

Isn't this like, your third/fourth thread on how much you dislike multiplayer and wish it was gone?

Just get over it. Wait for reviews, or don't get the game. It's pretty simple. Your incessant whining changes nothing.


Third thread. It took some effort to get a thread that the mods would allow to stay open.

And your advice is so brilliant that I'm amazed I didn't think of it!

The thought of NOT GETTING THE GAME never crossed my mind. NEVER! Seriously! HOOOOONESTLY!


Then don't get the game, and move on with your life.


Isn't the entire purpose of this message board to discuss ME3?

#121
BeefoTheBold

BeefoTheBold
  • Members
  • 957 messages

111987 wrote...

BeefoTheBold wrote...

111987 wrote...

Isn't this like, your third/fourth thread on how much you dislike multiplayer and wish it was gone?

Just get over it. Wait for reviews, or don't get the game. It's pretty simple. Your incessant whining changes nothing.


Third thread. It took some effort to get a thread that the mods would allow to stay open.

And your advice is so brilliant that I'm amazed I didn't think of it!

The thought of NOT GETTING THE GAME never crossed my mind. NEVER! Seriously! HOOOOONESTLY!


Then don't get the game, and move on with your life.


Thank you for your sage advice. You've changed my life forever. Godspeed. You can move on now knowing that I will take your advice deeply to heart.

Unless, of course, you actually have any thoughts about the development decisions not personally about me but rather the positive/negative impact of those decisions themselves on the game development.

Which is, actually, the topic of this thread.

#122
C9316

C9316
  • Members
  • 5 638 messages

Ricinator wrote...

@c9316
answers like that make you lose a lot of credibility.... if you had any to begin with Gears pansy

Are you implying something just because I play gears? Aww someone insulted me over the internet! OH NOES!!!

But to properly respond to your point, calling someone out and then calling them a "insert shooter game" pansy says a lot more about you than it says about me.

#123
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages

Ricinator wrote...

@admiralcheez
nobody is suggesting to get rid of combat...

Yes, but the way everyone fussing about it, it's like good gunplay is some horrible, awful creature that takes your brains away and turns you into a racist, homophobic, pre-pubescent jock.

Yeah, Kinect is a gimmick.  Yeah, ME3 doesn't need multiplayer.  They're both obvious grabs for cash, and I'm annoyed by EA's money-grubbing as much as everyone else.  But these features can still be implemented well, natural for the player to engage in, and fun as hell.

I play Mass Effect for the experience.  The combat, universe, characters, mechanics--they're all part of that.  From the demos and press reviews I have seen, and from developer comments (minus the obvious hype), I don't think that experience has been weakened.  So EA's overselling their product; the most that will be is a nuisance.

I am slightly concerned about Origin, though.  Thanks to Battle.net and Steam.  Jerks.

#124
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*

Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
  • Guests
Well I personally don't agree with any of the things OP is worried about (By that I mean I don;t like that they're in the game), but there's nothing I can do about it.

#125
Xeranx

Xeranx
  • Members
  • 2 255 messages

leonia42 wrote...

If you were expecting DA2 to play like DA:O after playing the demo then that doesn't speak very highly of your intelligence. Did you expect Bioware to produce something completely different from the demo after how late they were in the development cycle?


Wow.  Seriously?  You can cut the elitist speak here.  

Many people gave Bioware the benefit of the doubt after looking at the demo.  Questioning someone's intelligence is not your right in any way, shape, or form.  Especially in this regard.

Modifié par Xeranx, 28 octobre 2011 - 03:02 .