Xeranx wrote...
CyberDirectorFreedom wrote...
Xeranx wrote...
CyberDirectorFreedom wrote...
It was leading to sex. You are seriously broken if you can't see that.
How are you sure? You're seriously broken if you can actually think your assumption can be used as proof.
How are you sure it wasn't leading to sex? You are using your assumption as proof too. But my assumption is much more likely.
Actually I said it could be anything which is a fact. I made no assumption about her motives after she started having you recite her words. I posited what it could be, but never made a distinction as to what it actually was.
Fine. Then what do you think she was doing. What do you assume. I'd really like to know.





Retour en haut






