That's another problem with this theory. The Reapers would be expending some severe energy to create mass effect fields large enough to push the mass of the star past the supernova point. Would such an artificial supernova even create eezo in sufficient quantity to be worth that massive energy cost? This is along with the fact that there are other, bigger stars that would require less manipulation to go supernova. Why not use them? And as I've already said, there are plenty of "primary" sources of eezo that are virtually untapped already in existence. Why not use them? This whole "eezo farming" theory just doesn't work on many levels.25ryanator wrote...
To get a star to deliberately go supernova would require massive ammounts of energy and mass to push a star to the supernova threshold and it would take a long time to do that. But the Reapers seem quite capable of doing that in a reasonable amount of time.But there are many things that could go wrong during the process and after such as,the star reaches the threshold too quickly before the Reapers can get to a safe distance,the star might reach the threshold but fail to go supernova,the star might go supernova but fail to create any element zero at all and finally the Reapers might expend all their energy and the star won't reach the threshold and go supernova.So alot of things could go wrong and the Reapers will be back at square one.
The Reapers are the most likely culprit from what we've seen so far, we just don't know why they would do this.





Retour en haut






