Does choosing Anderson or Udina actually matter at all?
#1
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 05:18
#2
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 05:23
#3
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 05:36
111987 wrote...
Hopefully it does matter. In the books Anderson is an advisor, and he ends up being fired, or he retires, something like that.
He quits before anyone can get around to firing him. Also, it's only in Retribution where he's an advisor (technically, ambassador).
#4
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 05:37
#5
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 05:39
Some dialogue may change to fill in the non-book-readers, but as far as story-line, it is not likely to matter a whole lot. My guess is that they had to save money on the production and keep the divergent story-lines limited.
#6
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 05:39
#7
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 05:42
game-zerox wrote...
I hope the fact I got back my spectre status because I choose Anderson will at least mean something. It seem that's the difference Shepard gets from this choice.
Actually, it only matters if you killed the Council. If you saved them, you can still get your Spectre status even if you chose Udina. It's only when the old Council is dead and he's on the new one where he can exercise enough control to prevent that happening.
#8
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 05:42
-Polite
#9
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 05:45
#10
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 05:50
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
#11
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 06:13
SandTrout wrote...
Most likely, that is one of the choices that will not matter much. It is generally accepted that Anderson Resigns his post during the events of Retribution, regardless of previous councilor status.
Some dialogue may change to fill in the non-book-readers, but as far as story-line, it is not likely to matter a whole lot. My guess is that they had to save money on the production and keep the divergent story-lines limited.
But does he only resign if he is the adviser, and not the councillor? Perhaps if Anderson is Councillor, he simply doesn't quit in ME: Retribution, but everything else happens exactly the same.
#12
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 06:20
#13
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 06:38
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Dave of Canada wrote...
I'd like to see Anderson as Councilor resulting in little change, Udina had to spend his short time in the role fixing all the political ****storms that Anderson conjured up by leaving the role. Udina would create a stronger political force behind the Alliance and more respect, despite being a "politican" at heart.
Yeah, as if.
That's not gonna happen.
#14
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 07:04
#15
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 07:16
#16
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 07:48
#17
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 08:00
WOLF_00 wrote...
I don't think this choice will be valid because of Anderson stepping down of his position on citedal. But what are implication of Anderson leaving the Councilor position empty? Assuming Udina lose it for an alien like Turions for instance
No, because humanity has the Council seat. It doesn't belong to any one human, nor can it ever belong to a non-human. It would never go to a turian because then the turians would have two votes. The Council does not work that way. And for another species to get a seat, they'd have to expand the Council again, so that it had 5 member species instead of 4. In any case, speculation is pointless because we already know that Udina is the Councilor, period.
Modifié par didymos1120, 31 octobre 2011 - 08:01 .
#18
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 08:10
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
They've already ensured continuity with other events in the games. I don't believe a councilor really needs to be one of them but it's already done.PoliteAssasin wrote...
It's necessary to ensure continuity. Some things have to be linear. This is one of them.
-Polite
#19
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 08:20
didymos1120 wrote...
WOLF_00 wrote...
I don't think this choice will be valid because of Anderson stepping down of his position on citedal. But what are implication of Anderson leaving the Councilor position empty? Assuming Udina lose it for an alien like Turions for instance
No, because humanity has the Council seat. It doesn't belong to any one human, nor can it ever belong to a non-human. It would never go to a turian because then the turians would have two votes. The Council does not work that way. And for another species to get a seat, they'd have to expand the Council again, so that it had 5 member species instead of 4. In any case, speculation is pointless because we already know that Udina is the Councilor, period.
But what will happen if you choose all Council members to be humans in ME1. I recall there is an option to form a council of one species, human members only. Could Udina find himself as chairman in this case?
#20
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 08:26
#21
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 08:29
How many decisions have end up as Junk mail in Shep inbox in ME2? My Guess, 99.99%
#22
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 08:31
WOLF_00 wrote...
But what will happen if you choose all Council members to be humans in ME1. I recall there is an option to form a council of one species, human members only. Could Udina find himself as chairman in this case?
We already know what happened: Udina's nifty "all-human Council" idea didn't pan out. And that's all it was: Udina spouting off. The game ends right after that conversation, so the "all-human Council" never existed.
#23
Posté 31 octobre 2011 - 08:39
#24
Posté 03 novembre 2011 - 01:18
PoliteAssasin wrote...
It's necessary to ensure continuity. Some things have to be linear. This is one of them.
-Polite
I agree, some things have to be linear, but what is the point of giving us an important choice like this one if it won't mean anything. I hope that even if Anderson steps down, that whatever choice was made is worth something. I didn't like the fact that in ME2 my choices meant nothing at all except for some extra dialogue.
#25
Posté 03 novembre 2011 - 01:26





Retour en haut







