This is unrealistic if there is a compromise in the next game ? What the hell ? You already have the answers ? You already know what will happen in the future ? No and that's a bit arrogant. The truth is that as fanatics, you deny this script, that's it. The chantry must be completely destroyed, your revolution must not stop until you have what you want. I'd like this too for my fanatic mage, but that's it. For you, It is mandatory, " otherwise it is not realistic, because DO NOT WANT. " Your agenda is more important to you than the story. The story makes sense to you if it sticks to your own agenda,. And that's where it's wrong.
What are all these subliminal Messages ? : IF I AM NOT MAGE, IF I CAN NOT DEFEND THE MAGES IN THE NEXT GAME, I WON'T BUY DA3 ! Really ? No, but Really ?
In DAO and DA2 you couldn't play the mage class and defend the mages ? No. So I don't know what are you f!cking about.
What does that mean, " if bioware done this or that, that means it is an anti-MAGE or have an anti-mage agenda ? You speak as if it was a violation of human rights, racism and you were the defenders of a minority. And they deserve to be tried. It makes no sense. Bioware have no particular position to have, its purpose is to place events, advance their story as he wants to tell, with positive or negative consequences for a faction, a character or another. To say that Bioware is pro-mage or pro-templar, or pro-anti chantry makes no sense. Bioware does not care about all these considerations.
If mages lose the war - and it's possible - if the mages fail their revolution in the next game, That is not something you have to take personally, IT WON'T BE A DEFEAT FOR YOU PRO MAGE ON THIS BOARD, it wouldn't mean they hate you or hate mages. Instead that will be interesting for the story and to see the evolution. The news elements, the new situation, and without that this event could change your will and possibilities to help mage, with your own agenda.
Bioware doesn't have to save mages, because that's what you want, because it's your agenda, because otherwise YOU WILL BE ANGRY. Their story is not written according to the interests of each small private group. When they write their story they won't say for themself, here I have to meet some pro-mage expectations, and there the pro Templar expectations, and here pro qunari expectations, etc.
I am an opponent of Qunari, yet if Qunari conquer Thedas and win easily against the nation of Thedas and the chantry. I won't scream s : BIOWARE IS PRO-QUNARI, ANTI-HUMAN. That's not at all what counts for me, my agenda. On the contrary, it will be absolutely interesting to see this in the story, and yet my human pro-position wouldn't change at all. Because the story matters to me more than my own agenda, which is simply a reflection of what I think or what I want, but do not go further than that.
And I won't cry either,: AN ALLIANCE BETWEEN HUMAN AND QUNARI is UNREALISTIC IN THE FUTURE ? Do I know the future? Do I have all the answers that I can already determine what could and what couldn't be ? No.
The Chantry, I like the chantry. If the chantry was destroyed completely, and the revolution mage wins, I won't scream BIOWARE DECIDED TO SIDE WITH PRO-MAGE, BIOWARE IS ANTI-RELIGION, etc. etc..
Instead, I will be excited by the prospect of a major upheaval and its implications later.
When bioware brings a new dimension of the Templars, that's not because he wants to convince you that they are better than what you think. But because it is their story and that the Templars do not necessarily correspond to what you describe or think of them. If you want to think they are bad, okay that's your opinion, but bioware is not forced at all to follow you in this idea, they have their point of view of what the Templars are. ( thanks god, because they are all evil.... it's getting old )
For descriptions of mage in DA2, you can disagree with the excessive brutality in the concept, but intend to bring a new dimension compared to mages is good, not at all bad and especially not against you or the Mages.
The aim was to enlighten you on the risks involved in being a mage, details that couldn't be provided only in a single game, and there will be again lots of things you will discover in future games. And we should not think like some of you did.
With all that you forget the most important, The story as a whole. And not your agenda. If your own agenda is everything, or what counts first, of course, you will never be satisfied with your faulty logic. And every detail will be examined to see if Bioware has well portrayed mages to you, as if you were the defenders of a minority that monitors if they are not doing something stupid.
And let me tell you that you are a small minority, you are not at all representative of the majority outside. What they want isn't that mages are better portrayed, or templars better portrayed, or a revolution or, etc, but a story intelligent, interesting, with choices, yes, but there is no necessity that it fits absolutely with their agenda.
Modifié par Sylvianus, 05 novembre 2011 - 01:40 .
Retour en haut
