Sylvianus wrote...
There is something wrong with you. It is to believe that the purpose of bioware is to satisfy you, or match with your interests as a private group, such as a lobby. The purpose of bioware is not to write the destiny of mages based on what you think, or you plan for the future, depending on interest from a group or another. To expect choices, many choices, it's cool, it's reasonable. But to think that their view must necessarily stick to your point of view goes too far.
I don't think there's anything wrong with people who want significant choices, who want engaging factions that don't consist only of "stupid and insane mages" or "sadistic rapist templars," who want to see ramifications for the choices that could be made. When the protagonist takes a seat to the demands of the Plot, especially when the act makes no sense in the context of the narrative, then it takes me out of the moment, and it ruins my immersion and my enjoyment from the storyline.
Sylvianus wrote...
This is unrealistic if there is a compromise in the next game ? What the hell ? You already have the answers ? You already know what will happen in the future ? No and that's a bit arrogant. The truth is that as fanatics, you deny this script, that's it. The chantry must be completely destroyed, your revolution must not stop until you have what you want. I'd like this too for my fanatic mage, but that's it. For you, It is mandatory, " otherwise it is not realistic, because DO NOT WANT. " Your agenda is more important to you than the story. The story makes sense to you if it sticks to your own agenda,. And that's where it's wrong.
People have their own opinions about the templars and the mages. Both Origins and Dragon Age 2 invite the player to make a choice between the dichotomy of these two factions, so clearly people will make their own decisons about how they feel about the Order of Templars and the Circle of Magi.
People have an opinion about the schism between templars and mages, and some people feel that it's unrealistic for a compromise to be reached when the apparent goals of both factions are in complete opposition to one another. I don't see why you felt the need to make an entire thread about the fact that you dislike that people have a differing opinion than you do. You have an opinion, and some people have a different opinion, that's all.
Sylvianus wrote...
What are all these subliminal Messages ? : IF I AM NOT MAGE, IF I CAN NOT DEFEND THE MAGES IN THE NEXT GAME, I WON'T BUY DA3 ! Really ? No, but Really ? 
You are upset because people would prefer to have multiple choices as opposed to none at all?
I really don't understand why you are so upset about this. If people don't agree with the Chantry or the templars, why should they want to play the next game if they are forced to side with the Chantry or the templars as a Seeker? If people exclusively play as mages in Dragon Age series, and don't favor playing as a warrior or a rogue, why would they purchase the game if mages aren't avaliable?
Sylvianus wrote...
In DAO and DA2 you couldn't play the mage class and defend the mages ? No. So I don't know what are you f!cking about.
The issue seems to be that some people don't like the idea of being forced to play as a member of an organization that they don't personally find any enjoyment from, which is what some people were speculating about based on rumors. I don't see why you are so irate about their opinions.
Sylvianus wrote...
What does that mean, " if bioware done this or that, that means it is an anti-MAGE or have an anti-mage agenda ? You speak as if it was a violation of human rights, racism and you were the defenders of a minority. And they deserve to be tried. It makes no sense. Bioware have no particular position to have, its purpose is to place events, advance their story as he wants to tell, with positive or negative consequences for a faction, a character or another. To say that Bioware is pro-mage or pro-templar, or pro-anti chantry makes no sense. Bioware does not care about all these considerations.
So you're upset that people feel that the storyline was badly handled on multiple fronts? That virtually all the mage antagonists were insane and stupid, and all the templar antagonists were sadists and rapists? That there was no attempt to provide any depth to the two factions? That the "two endings" were virtually identical to one another despite siding with the opposing faction?
I don't know what to tell you, because I didn't think it was properly handled myself. I think people would prefer to have a storyline where virtually everyone wasn't a complete idiot, if you want my honest opinion. Putting a few codex entries and saying everyone is insane and stupid because of the Band of Three or because of the imprisoned darkspawn in Legacy doesn't really cut it. Not to mention a pro-active protagonist who doesn't stand idly by while someone is murdered right in front of him, or continues to let dangerous people walk away because the Plot Dictates that this happens.
Sylvianus wrote...
If mages lose the war - and it's possible - if the mages fail their revolution in the next game, That is not something you have to take personally, IT WON'T BE A DEFEAT FOR YOU PRO MAGE ON THIS BOARD, it wouldn't mean they hate you or hate mages. Instead that will be interesting for the story and to see the evolution. The news elements, the new situation, and without that this event could change your will and possibilities to help mage, with your own agenda.
Bioware doesn't have to save mages, because that's what you want, because it's your agenda, because otherwise YOU WILL BE ANGRY. Their story is not written according to the interests of each small private group. When they write their story they won't say for themself, here I have to meet some pro-mage expectations, and there the pro Templar expectations, and here pro qunari expectations, etc.
Everyone has an opinion about who might win the war - templars or mages. That's all it is - an opinion. Personally, I doubt the protagonist will have any choice in choosing between templars or mages unless the creators force the protagonist to side with one over the other, because I doubt future sequels to the third game will accomodate such a distinct choice between the templars or the mages in every single sequel to the game.
Sylvianus wrote...
I am an opponent of Qunari, yet if Qunari conquer Thedas and win easily against the nation of Thedas and the chantry. I won't scream s : BIOWARE IS PRO-QUNARI, ANTI-HUMAN. That's not at all what counts for me, my agenda. On the contrary, it will be absolutely interesting to see this in the story, and yet my human pro-position wouldn't change at all. Because the story matters to me more than my own agenda, which is simply a reflection of what I think or what I want, but do not go further than that.
Is this about the controversy over Hawke letting Tallis walk away for people who opposed the Qunari? Because I think people are tired of the protagonist doing nothing when it's within his power to do something. At least, I am.
Sylvianus wrote...
And I won't cry either,: AN ALLIANCE BETWEEN HUMAN AND QUNARI is UNREALISTIC IN THE FUTURE ? Do I know the future? Do I have all the answers that I can already determine what could and what couldn't be ? No.
People have opinions. If people have a different opinion than you, it's nothing personal.
Retour en haut
