Captain Anderson belongs in Jail
#151
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 02:50
#152
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 02:52
#153
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 02:55
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Takio wrote...
Cerberus's motives are sound, but their execution, consistently endangers humanity and the Galaxy at large.
No it doesn't. The only example I can think of is Overlord, but even that is debatable. They endanger everybody about as much as anyone else does. That's just the nature of Mass Effect.
#154
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:04
Saphra Deden wrote...
Takio wrote...
Cerberus's motives are sound, but their execution, consistently endangers humanity and the Galaxy at large.
No it doesn't. The only example I can think of is Overlord, but even that is debatable. They endanger everybody about as much as anyone else does. That's just the nature of Mass Effect.
No Overlord, is not debatable. If released, then it would have been catastrophic.
The Teltin, project ultimately released a mentally broken super-biotic upon the galaxy. She would go on to launch a Space Station into a moon.
The attempts to weaponize the Rahni, backfired horribly, and they could potentially have had a new Rachni infestation in the galaxy.
Their attempts to weaponize Reaper technology produced another potential threat to society, in the form of a super reaperized Saren-esque abomination.
The sheer amount of times Cerberus has failed, leaves me having no confidence in them.
#155
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:08
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Takio wrote...
No Overlord, is not debatable. If released, then it would have been catastrophic.
No, I doubt that. Overlord was limited by the Human/VI interface which provided the guts of the VI and is what made it so powerful. However because Overlord is fundamentally based on hardware then there are limits to how much it can control at once. I doubt it could have done much once it reached the Normandy, even if it got to another inhabited system.
Takio wrote...
The Teltin, project ultimately released a mentally broken super-biotic upon the galaxy. She would go on to launch a Space Station into a moon.
A biotic who proved very useful in the end on a mission critical to the survival of the human race.
Takio wrote...
The attempts to weaponize the Rahni, backfired horribly, and they could potentially have had a new Rachni infestation in the galaxy.
They had no queen so that's out of the question. Paragon Shepard on the other hand certainly risked this happening.
Takio wrote...
Their attempts to weaponize Reaper technology produced another potential threat to society, in the form of a super reaperized Saren-esque abomination.
The blame for that falls on Anderson and his turian cohorts. It was Cerberus who put an end to that menace with Anderson and Kahlee attempting to stop them all the way.
Takio wrote...
The sheer amount of times Cerberus has failed, leaves me having no confidence in them.
You feel that way because you have a very liberal definition of the word fail. If you actually look at how many Cerberus projects attained their goals you'll be surprised by how often they succeeded, which is quite a lot. Their only real 'failures' are the rachni and Teltin.
#156
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:12
Only one person will ever have a better grasp of a character then the actor playing them, so Sheens opinion holds a lot of weight. He knows what TIM says, what TIM thinks what TIM does and why. He knows when TIM lies.Saphra Deden wrote...
AntiChri5 wrote...
Any excuse to discount evidence that does not agree with your view, right buddy?
I was being sarcastic and maybe a bit silly. If you have evidence then show it to me. Martin Sheen saying he doesn't trust the Illusive Man isn't evidence. Anderson doesn't trust him either. Neither does Jacob, or Ashley, or Kaidan, or Joker, or anybody. However most people use a different meaning of "trust" than I do.
As I've explained, I trust TIM is truthful when it comes to his broad goals of advancing mankind. He doesn't elaborate on the specifics and I don't doubt for a moment that he'd have Shepard killed if he got in the way. TIM is not 'my' friend and I've never regarded him as such.
The problem is how vauge he is about what advances mankind. He feels advancing mankind includes biotics, so he has an entire colony exposed to potentially lethal radiation to get a few dozen test subjects. He is going to impose his vision of what humanity should be on humanity, no matter what humanity has to say about it. He even thinks that his small organisation of hand picked individuals adequately represents humanity.
AntiChri5 wrote...
Im sure Cerberus has never done anything untrustworthy. They were just labeled a terrorist organisation for funsies.
They are labeled terrorists by organizations that have no business trying to take the moral highground.
They are labeled terrorists by pretty much everyone.
Modifié par AntiChri5, 06 novembre 2011 - 03:13 .
#157
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:12
Agreed. Their actions may have broken Alliance protocol, but they were taken for the sake of a greater loyalty to the human race that the Alliance serves and the galactic community of which it is a part.Mesina2 wrote...
Why don't we also jail Shepard for stealing the Normandy?
Both Anderson and Shepard did what can be considered actions of traitors, but yet none got penalized?
Why?
Cause they did it to stop greater threat.
Shepard to stop Saren once and for all, while Anderson the same with Cerberus.
Even though Cerberus wasn't stopped, they got hit really hard and if didn't joined Reapers they would have crumble by the start of ME3.
#158
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:14
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
#159
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:17
And there was no "selling". They didn't pay him.
#160
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:17
I can understand why "Removing moles from the Alliance, who belong to a group which the Alliance has declared war towards" as an ends doesn't justify "giving Alliance officers to turians" as means for you, as you are actively practicing pagan worship to that naughty Greek doggie who got its ass kicked by a mere demigod.
But, consider this.
Anderson did what he did. He revealed that the Alliance has Cerberus moles in it. That looked bad.
Now, what'd be worse? Arresting someone who just proved that you are infiltrated by terrorists and aided towards their arrest, or letting him go?
Of course, when I say "worse", I am not talking about morality, since as we all know, morality should only be used as a tool that causes wars which in turn create profit, eh, Saphra?
When I say worse, I am talking about what would make you look worse, and what would make you lose popular support, and therefore become less powerful.
#161
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:17
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
AntiChri5 wrote...
Only one person will ever have a better grasp of a character then the actor playing them, so Sheens opinion holds a lot of weight.
No, it doesn't.
Sheen is mostly just a voice. He, like almost everyone else who discusses time, neglects to explain himself when he says he doesn't trust the Illusive Man.
AntiChri5 wrote...
He is going to impose his vision of what humanity should be on humanity, no matter what humanity has to say about it.
Yeah, that's life. Those with the means and the will rule.
AntiChri5 wrote...
He even thinks that his small organisation of hand picked individuals adequately represents humanity.
Seeing as they are the only thing that stands between humanity and destruction during the course of ME2, in which those statements are made, he is correct.
[AntiChri5 wrote...
They are labeled terrorists by pretty much everyone.
Which means what? Even you should know better than to fall for that fallacy.
#162
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:18
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Phaedon wrote...
Anderson did what he did. He revealed that the Alliance has Cerberus moles in it. That looked bad.
Anderson had bad ends therefore his means aren't justified in the slightest.
#163
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:20
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
AntiChri5 wrote...
It does when you are enlisting allies to clean house.
And there was no "selling". They didn't pay him.
Yes they did too pay him. Anderson gave them the information they needed and they provided the means. It was a deal. No different from Kohoku agreeing to give Alliance secrets to the Shadow Broker. A betrayal which got him rightly killed. Cerberus was too kind to him.
#164
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:21
Modifié par Takio, 06 novembre 2011 - 03:24 .
#165
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:22
The ends made the Alliance more powerful, whilst looking bad, because they directly hurt a faction which the Alliance is actively fighting.Saphra Deden wrote...
Phaedon wrote...
Anderson did what he did. He revealed that the Alliance has Cerberus moles in it. That looked bad.
Anderson had bad ends therefore his means aren't justified in the slightest.
Also, cut the nationalist cr@p. You have, yourself, condemned empathy or loyalty to anything but yourself and what produces the greatest profit. Loyalty to a nation or a federation is unrenegade.
#166
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:23
[quote]Saphra Deden wrote...
[quote]Takio wrote...
No Overlord, is not debatable. If released, then it would have been catastrophic. [/quote]
No, I doubt that. Overlord was limited by the Human/VI interface which provided the guts of the VI and is what made it so powerful. However because Overlord is fundamentally based on hardware then there are limits to how much it can control at once. I doubt it could have done much once it reached the Normandy, even if it got to another inhabited system. [/quote]
Yes, I'm sure the hack of the most advanced warship in space, would have no consequences at all.
[quote]Takio wrote...
The Teltin, project ultimately released a mentally broken super-biotic upon the galaxy. She would go on to launch a Space Station into a moon. [/quote]
[quote]Saphra Deden wrote...
A biotic who proved very useful in the end on a mission critical to the survival of the human race. [/quote] Not especially, another biotic could be used for the same task.
[quote]Takio wrote...
The attempts to weaponize the Rahni, backfired horribly, and they could potentially have had a new Rachni infestation in the galaxy. [/quote]
[quote]Saphra Deden wrote...
They had no queen so that's out of the question. Paragon Shepard on the other hand certainly risked this happening. [/quote]
Actually, I'm fairly sure they had. They had Nest Warriors, so that implies they had some form of reproducing themselves.
[quote]Takio wrote...
Their attempts to weaponize Reaper technology produced another potential threat to society, in the form of a super reaperized Saren-esque abomination. [/quote]
[quote]Saphra Deden wrote...
The blame for that falls on Anderson and his turian cohorts. It was Cerberus who put an end to that menace with Anderson and Kahlee attempting to stop them all the way. [/quote]
Obviously it was Anderson's fault that they created it, in the first place.
[quote]Takio wrote...
The sheer amount of times Cerberus has failed, leaves me having no confidence in them.
[/quote]
[quote]Saphra Deden wrote...
You feel that way because you have a very liberal definition of the word fail. If you actually look at how many Cerberus projects attained their goals you'll be surprised by how often they succeeded, which is quite a lot. Their only real 'failures' are the rachni and Teltin.
[/quote]
Overlord program to control the Geth? Project not complete and redundant anyway.
Threser Maw research? Nothing was learned, except a cool way to kill your own soldiers, and it a vengeful soldier was produced.
Weaponize husks? Nope.
Reaper research? Nothing I could think of, was learned, except a way to make another Saren.
Heres, a better question? Can Cerberus, do anything without getting massive amounts of people killed?
#167
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:27
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Takio wrote...
Yes, I'm sure the hack of the most advanced warship in space, would have no consequences at all.
Galaxy shattering consequences? I doubt it. As I said, the program was fundamentally tied to the David/VI interface.
Takio wrote...
Not especially, another biotic could be used for the same task.
That another biotic could do the same task doesn't make her any less useful.
Takio wrote...
Actually, I'm fairly sure they had.
I'm quite positive you have no idea what you are talking about. We find out from Cerberus itself where they got the rachni. They had no queen, they only had specimens born from the same queen that Binary-Helix had on Noveria. There was no threat of an infestation until your Paragon Shepard set the queen free.
Good job!
Takio wrote...
Obviously it was Anderson's fault that they created it, in the first place.
It was of no danger until Anderson set it loose.
Takio wrote...
Overlord program to control the Geth? Project not complete and redundant anyway.
Cerberus are such morons for not predicting the future. In any regard, Overlord is not redundant at all. Reprogramming the Heretic geth doesn't put them under human control; it leaves them under geth control. The geth are still dangerous. They are still unfriendly and unpredictable. Overlord is as important now as it was when it was first conceived.
Takio wrote...
Threser Maw research? Nothing was learned...
You don't even know what they were studying or why so I reccomend you just drop this subject before you make a fool of yourself.
Takio wrote...
Weaponize husks? Nope.
How can you judge success or failure in this case? Shepard kicked in the door and shot everything dead.
Takio wrote...
Reaper research? Nothing I could think of, was learned, except a way to make another Saren.
Yeah, I'm starting understand that. I'll help you thought: Reaper research gave us the IFF and EDI, both technologies that were invaluable in defeating the Collectors and may have further applications. Thank Cerberus for that.
Takio wrote...
Heres, a better question? Can Cerberus, do anything without getting massive amounts of people killed?
Probably, but I don't care either way as long as they get the job done and Cerbers gets the job done.
#168
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:28
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Phaedon wrote...
The ends made the Alliance more powerful,
No, it made the Alliance weaker.
Cerberus never hurts the Alliance, it tries to do the opposite.
#169
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:30
Saphra Deden wrote...
AntiChri5 wrote...
Only one person will ever have a better grasp of a character then the actor playing them, so Sheens opinion holds a lot of weight.
No, it doesn't.
Sheen is mostly just a voice. He, like almost everyone else who discusses time, neglects to explain himself when he says he doesn't trust the Illusive Man.
Sheen is an actor. Clearly, you don't understand what is involved in that profession at all.
Saphra Deden wrote...
AntiChri5 wrote...
He is going to impose his vision of what humanity should be on humanity, no matter what humanity has to say about it.
Yeah, that's life. Those with the means and the will rule.
And those with the means and the will stop them.
Saphra Deden wrote...
AntiChri5 wrote...
He even thinks that his small organisation of hand picked individuals adequately represents humanity.
Seeing as they are the only thing that stands between humanity and destruction during the course of ME2, in which those statements are made, he is correct.
First up, he wasn't the only thing satanding between humanity or destruction. The Collectors had one ship, which got it's ass kicked by one alliance placed turret. They could never have taklen earth.
Secondly, even if you were correct, safegaurding something does not mean you represent it. That is absurd.
Saphra Deden wrote...
[AntiChri5 wrote...
They are labeled terrorists by pretty much everyone.
Which means what? Even you should know better than to fall for that fallacy.
Yes, the vast majority of the galaxy thinking you are dangerous criminals means nothing.......
Even i? Shandepard, at least i can post on an internet forum without being banned.
Modifié par AntiChri5, 06 novembre 2011 - 03:31 .
#170
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:33
Even disregarding the direct conflicts caused by Cerberus (squads of marines dead in ME1, high ranking officials abducted, tortured and murdered), they are a massive resource drain either during the Eden Prime War or afterwards, when the Alliance is weak due to BoC, because raids had to be organized and the Counter Intelligence dept is occupied.Saphra Deden wrote...
Phaedon wrote...
The ends made the Alliance more powerful,
No, it made the Alliance weaker.
Cerberus never hurts the Alliance, it tries to do the opposite.
In general, a blow to your enemy is good for you.
That's even more hypocritical of you, btw, because having enemy factions as allies is not "divide and conquer" at all.
Modifié par Phaedon, 06 novembre 2011 - 03:33 .
#171
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:34
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
AntiChri5 wrote...
Sheen is an actor.
Which proves what? He's just expressing an opinion.
AntiChri5 wrote...
First up, he wasn't the only thing satanding between humanity or destruction.
Yes he was. Anyone else was just working for him.
AntiChri5 wrote...
Yes, the vast majority of the galaxy thinking you are dangerous criminals means nothing.......
On second thought, I take back what I said. Apparently I overestimated you.
#172
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:34
#173
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:35
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Phaedon wrote...
Even disregarding the direct conflicts caused by Cerberus (squads of marines dead in ME1, high ranking officials abducted, tortured and murdered),
A few dead marines wasn't hurting the Alliance. It was such a small matter the Alliance didn't even want to investigate it. Kohoku was poised to hurt the Alliance far more with his deal with the Shadow Broker.
#174
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:41
Despite what video games teach you, manpower isn't a simple resource like any other. Training and maintaining marines, or having random marines attacked, lowers morale and costs a lot of money. Also, allowing marines to die gives the enemy faction the chance to think that they can carry out more attacks without consequences which is extremely harmful.Saphra Deden wrote...
A few dead marines wasn't hurting the Alliance. It was such a small matter the Alliance didn't even want to investigate it. Kohoku was poised to hurt the Alliance far more with his deal with the Shadow Broker.
Making a deal with the Shadow Broker was another "ends justify the means" decision. Kahoku gave out the info about some marines missing and what he got was a major info dump on an enemy faction.
Whether you like it or not, Cerberus is classified as an enemy by the Alliance and they have spent resources combating them.
I'll be back later to see you lose more of your self-respect!
Modifié par Phaedon, 06 novembre 2011 - 03:42 .
#175
Posté 06 novembre 2011 - 03:41
Modifié par Nohvarr, 06 novembre 2011 - 03:43 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







