Aller au contenu

Photo

Which species would you abandon?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
127 réponses à ce sujet

#51
The dead fish

The dead fish
  • Members
  • 7 775 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Sylvianus wrote...

So, nobody of you would feel bad to leave Volus, hanar and elcors because they are weak ?


plainly

The hanara and elcor? They're not potent enough to matter either way as far as we know. The volus however are useful allies. Most especially in the aftermath. The economy is going to be in shambles most likely and we'll need their keen grasp of economics to get it back on track.

I agree for the Volus. But it seems the same case for hanara, even if we don't know enough about them. They are the next after humans considered as potential to be member of the council.

#52
C9316

C9316
  • Members
  • 5 638 messages
I'd probably abandon the quarians, and batarians. The quarians and apparently batarians are weak races that'll contirbute little to nothing to the war effort.

#53
C-Sec Nova

C-Sec Nova
  • Members
  • 123 messages

BubbleSauce wrote...

C-Sec Nova wrote...

BubbleSauce wrote...

C-Sec Nova wrote...

I really hate Batarians... so they would be first on my list... Then I would probably get rid of Vorcha, which I am sure would make Captain Gavorn happy... then probably the Humans or Yahg would go third....


Really? your willing to let humans go over, oh I don't know, the drell? or the hanar? or elcor? We have so much more to contribute to galactic society! Or is this just another case of the ridculous self hatred that I see so often on these forums?

I think the Drell have something that can contribute, The elcor on the other hand... as well as the hanar... I totally didn't think about them XD I would put them at second or third!


The drell are barely existant, they have very small numbers, maybe when the regain their numbers, but not in their current state.

But some are Trained Assasins and could be useful >.< but I think the Elcor are definitely pointless as well as the Elcor... but I would still get rid of the Batarians first XD

#54
TCGodzilla

TCGodzilla
  • Members
  • 204 messages

C9316 wrote...

I'd probably abandon the quarians, and batarians. The quarians and apparently batarians are weak races that'll contirbute little to nothing to the war effort.

Quarians have the largest fleet in the galaxy and the batarian could unite all the Terminus Systems under Shepard's banner if convinced.

#55
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Sylvianus wrote...

I agree for the Volus. But it seems the same case for hanara, even if we don't know enough about them. They are the next after humans considered as potential to be member of the council.


plainly

That could mean the hanar will be eligable for Council membership in a decade or in ten decades or in 50 decades. Or never. The Council has a long history going back some 1300 years of not inviting new members.

#56
BioWareM0d13

BioWareM0d13
  • Members
  • 21 133 messages

TCGodzilla wrote...

C9316 wrote...

I'd probably abandon the quarians, and batarians. The quarians and apparently batarians are weak races that'll contirbute little to nothing to the war effort.

Quarians have the largest fleet in the galaxy and the batarian could unite all the Terminus Systems under Shepard's banner if convinced.


The Quarians have a large fleet of obsolete space junk held together with duct tape, chewing gum and a prayer.

Yes, the Quarians have the largest fleet in the galaxy. But most of the ships are far from being combat ready and are packed with civilians. The combat effeciency of the Quarians would be far below that of the Turians, Asari, Salarians, Humanity, the Geth, and probably below that of the Hanar as well.







The hanara and elcor? They're not potent enough to matter either way as far as we know. The volus however are useful allies. Most especially in the aftermath. The economy is going to be in shambles most likely and we'll need their keen grasp of economics to get it back on track.


Agreed on the Volus.

In ME1 there was some speculation that the Hanar would be next in line for a Council seat. Since one of the requirements for gaining a Council seat is a capability to defend Council space, we can safely assume that the Hanar have a powerful fleet.  No one would be speculating about the Hanar gaining a Council seat if they were considered militarily weak.

The Elcor: Do they even have much of a fleet? Either way, like the Krogan they could make useful ground troops. They apparently go into battle with cannons strapped to their backs.

Modifié par Han Shot First, 06 novembre 2011 - 11:19 .


#57
TCGodzilla

TCGodzilla
  • Members
  • 204 messages

Han Shot First wrote...

TCGodzilla wrote...

C9316 wrote...

I'd probably abandon the quarians, and batarians. The quarians and apparently batarians are weak races that'll contirbute little to nothing to the war effort.

Quarians have the largest fleet in the galaxy and the batarian could unite all the Terminus Systems under Shepard's banner if convinced.


The Quarians have a large fleet of obsolete space junk held together with duct tape, chewing gum and a prayer.

Yes, the Quarians have the largest fleet in the galaxy. But most of the ships are far from being combat ready and are packed with civilians. The combat effeciency of the Quarians would be far below that of the Turians, Asari, Salarians, Humanity, the Geth, and probably below that of the Hanar as well.

If they were below combat readiness they shouldn't have been able to knocked out that Reaper for a few moments and convince Shepard it look like it's hurt from that shot.

Modifié par TCGodzilla, 06 novembre 2011 - 11:34 .


#58
Dreadwing 67

Dreadwing 67
  • Members
  • 414 messages
Depends on the shep i'm playing as. I have a pure hearted shepard as my canon, so he will do anything in his power to save everyone and have fluffy bunnies parade at the end.

In reality it will be up to the Shep, and I will have to see how everything will come together March 6

Side note: one of my sheps hate krogan because he couldn't talk Wrex down, has no hope for em, so I go based offf that kind of thing

Modifié par Dreadwing 67, 06 novembre 2011 - 11:50 .


#59
Kaiser Shepard

Kaiser Shepard
  • Members
  • 7 890 messages
Asari and quarians.

#60
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 971 messages
Asari and Turian.

#61
Labrev

Labrev
  • Members
  • 2 237 messages

alex90c wrote...

vorcha

they're just vermin


YOU ARE!

#62
Labrev

Labrev
  • Members
  • 2 237 messages
I'd go asari and male-asari (drell).

#63
kregano

kregano
  • Members
  • 794 messages
Asari and whatever is left of the Batarians.

#64
Vegos

Vegos
  • Members
  • 538 messages
Vorcha for sure. Batarians if I couldn't help it.

And thresher maws, of course. Hate those things.

#65
C9316

C9316
  • Members
  • 5 638 messages

TCGodzilla wrote...

C9316 wrote...

I'd probably abandon the quarians, and batarians. The quarians and apparently batarians are weak races that'll contirbute little to nothing to the war effort.

Quarians have the largest fleet in the galaxy and the batarian could unite all the Terminus Systems under Shepard's banner if convinced.

The largest fleet of obsolete ships in the galaxy sure, and I don't know how the batarians could untie the Terminus systems. Perhaps you mean Aria.

#66
Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*

Guest_Tigerblood and MilkShakes_*
  • Guests
HUMANS

#67
Reptilian Rob

Reptilian Rob
  • Members
  • 5 964 messages
Maybe the Vorcha...

Modifié par Reptilian Rob, 07 novembre 2011 - 02:59 .


#68
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
Geth

#69
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests
That's a... difficult question. I'm going to have to think on it for a while before I can give a real answer.

#70
Sisterofshane

Sisterofshane
  • Members
  • 1 756 messages
Anybody who couldn't significantly contribute to the war effort, apart from Humanity, as they are the reason my Shep is fighting.
Being unwilling to waste any resources on a species that is likely to just hamper the Reaper Defeat seems like a good reason to abandon a species.

#71
suprhomre

suprhomre
  • Members
  • 1 671 messages
Batarian

#72
Guest_greengoron89_*

Guest_greengoron89_*
  • Guests
I wouldn't be so quick to abandon the Batarians - if they could be rallied to Shepard's cause, they might make a powerful ally against the Reapers.

The goal at the point in time ME3 takes place in is to destroy the Reapers at any cost - if it means allying yourself with an enemy race to do so, then that is the price that must be paid.

Modifié par greengoron89, 07 novembre 2011 - 03:12 .


#73
Silentblaze

Silentblaze
  • Members
  • 249 messages
The 3 races on my "first to abandon" list are geth, asari, and humans.

1) Geth can survive being completely wiped out by having a backup of all their run time software downloaded and a safe location. Maybe like a Jupiter brain. Then once the reapers are gone they can download themselves into new mobile platforms built from a hidden factory that survived with their run times.

2) Asari can survived being nearly wiped out because of their gene pool includes other species. Keep like a hundred fertile maidens safe in cryo somewhere and let the reapers blast 'em all. Once when the war is over take them out of cryo, and if at least one species with a viable gene pool survives, they can spend their 1000 year lives breeding like rabbits since asari can breed outside their species.

3) Humans. Plot Armor for one. Another that since Mordin said we have a more diverse gene pool than any other race in ME universe so our species could take the hit of loosing most of mankind. I can see them making a comeback if humanity was reduced to quarian (17 million) and possibly drell (375 thousand) population sizes.Remember! Plot armor!

#74
Unpleasant Implications

Unpleasant Implications
  • Members
  • 1 044 messages
Quarians, most of their accents annoy me.

#75
Clara Shepard

Clara Shepard
  • Members
  • 580 messages

Bekkael wrote...

None! I will save them all.

All of them if it means winning!

As few as possible, but losses are sometimes necessary.

:)

(I don't actually know who I would abandon, but likely whichever race had less strategic importance and fewer war assets.)


I would save everyone, or kill my shep trying!:wizard: