Rykoth wrote...
Ian, I'm going to ask a simple question.
How is it fair that the decisions of ME1/ME2 would matter anyway?
It is entirely fair. It is what Bioware promised us. If they didn't want those decisions to matter, don't allow us to make them and don't tell them that they actually will matter if they don't.
I'm not mentioning any spoilers, because I'm already forgetting them from my accidental glance last night. (and personally, the people responsible for doing this should be shamed for possibly ruining the game for so many since some are quick to judge on lines of text.)
Let's use a hypothetical scenario that all the decisions of the past two games matter in huge ways.
So say you don't play ME1 or ME2. You didn't make the decisions, and therefore, if say, you're entering the series at number 3, you just cannot get say... the good guy prevails and everyone celebrates ending. Fom the perspective of a new entrant into the series, it isn't fair, and wouldn't be right to force people to retroactively play just so that they can get their desired say, ending in ME3.
There are many ways this can be handled. The two most obvious are:
1. Default Shepard. This is how ME2 was originally released and it worked fine.
2. Allow the player to interactively make those choices in a quick sequence at the start of the game (like Genesis only done better).
Next point I'd offer.
Have you played ME3? No? Okay. Don't judge until you play it. The people who are sitting there and reading choppy and potentially unfinished text and saying "OH MY GOD THE SKY IS FALLING" need to take a chill pill, sit back, and wait until March. It would be one thing if it was written like say, a novel, with excruiciating detail and sounding like crap, but its not. From all indication its rough notes and maybe some dialogue. Unspoken, unvoiced, without true context.
I have actually seen the beta version of ME3 and from what I've seen it's as bad as advertised. I was withholding judgement since the visual fine tuning are often the last (and easist) things to fix, but the story is almost certainly in the (near) final state by this late stage.
So how can you judge? You can't, and unless you work at Bioware and have likely seen all of this in its true form, with all the context, then I'd suggest stop blowing a gasket.
I can judge very well based on the lateness of the date, the amount of evidence, and Bioware's (and Microsoft's) reactions as well as other recent Bioware game. Others (such as Game Informer) are making judgements too.
And DA2? Yeah, DA2 wasn't the best game. It was rushed, and the recycled environments made it old quickly. It was also rushed, did I not mention that? ME3 thus far has yet to be rushed, and has a different dev team.
ME2 came out in 2010. ME3 was supposed to come out this year. That seems rushed to me.
So... really, all I can say is, people on this forum need to take a friggin chill pill and stop freaking out over nothing. Be angry at Microsoft for leaking the demo. Be angry at the morons for datamining and spoiling the world. Don't be angry at Bioware until you've actually played the game.
Who are you going to believe? Bioware or your "lying eyes"?
-Polaris