Bioware's had quite a tough week..
#126
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:28
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
#127
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:28
#128
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:29
Saphra Deden wrote...
I don't mind Bioware being tight-lipped. Otherwise they tend to spoil a lot of things about the games ahead of time. (like Jack, say)
What about Jack? Do I want to know? Will I even care?
#129
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:31
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Ravensword wrote...
What about Jack? Do I want to know? Will I even care?
I'm talking about before the release of ME2. She was one of the most advertised characters... However in the actual game it is played up as a surprise that Jack is a girl... except we all knew that.
Same with Archangel being Garrus.
#130
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:32
#131
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:37
IanPolaris wrote...
Drinking Shepard wrote...
Besides, see what happens when you keep fans on a very, very strict information diet <_<
Indeed, this is a good point. Much of this damage is self-inflicted. Sure BW couldn't possibly know that MS would foul things up this badly, but the fact that BW has been agonizingly tight lipped about ME3 made the community ravenous for any detail at all about ME3. Not only that, but had Bioware been a bit more forthcoming a lot earlier, then perhaps the reaction of the community would not come as such a suprise and come early enough to real changes to be considered at least.
Now....now I have little to no hope for ME3 which is a damn shame since I was looking forward to it.
-Polaris
I don't think if they shared the information any sooner any real diffence besides when the complaining started changed and the only reason why they have been so tight lipped is because of the complaining on these very boards about how much they ruined Mass Effect 2, which had pretty much the same level of complaining to what is going on right now.
#132
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:37
IanPolaris wrote...
Now....now I have little to no hope for ME3 which is a damn shame since I was looking forward to it.
-Polaris
Oh I'm getting used to it. I was in particular looking forward to Crysis 2 -> HUGE disappointment. Battlfield 3 - not bad, better than MW3, but still didn't live up to expectations. I'm sad to face that now it's Mass Effect 3 turn
#133
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:38
Examples?DiegoProgMetal wrote...
By Casey's tweets, one can notice that he is extremely pi***d by this story leak.
#134
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:41
Sanunes wrote...
I don't think if they shared the information any sooner any real diffence besides when the complaining started changed and the only reason why they have been so tight lipped is because of the complaining on these very boards about how much they ruined Mass Effect 2, which had pretty much the same level of complaining to what is going on right now.
I'm not so sure. Of course I agree that in ME2, BW probably erred to much the other way (was a bit too generous with it's spoilers), but as I recall the big complaints with ME2 were the 'dumbing down' of RP elements (no armor choices for squaddies, limited skill set, etc) which turned out to be poison in DA2 but worked in ME2 because ME wasn't a pure RPG from the outset. This is different. We have Bioware on record as saying that our big choices in ME1 and ME2 will matter for the grand finale of ME3, yes they really will......and we find out that, no they really won't.
That IMHO is far more serious.
-Polaris
#135
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:44
Genshie wrote...
Your knowledge is good and all, but my point still stand you have never made a game. You can have all the knowledge in the world but unless you actually apply that knowledge then it means utter crap to anyone. In the end you have as much credit as anyone else on these boards and until we recieve actual official confirmation or until the game comes out all we can do is guess. You say your involved but have given no evidence in this.
I don't understand why you gals and guys are so upset over this.
I can see no negative to Ian, Kaisy and Saphra deciding not to buy the game, and subsequently not posting on the forums. It's their choice, isn't it?
#136
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:48
#137
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:49
We also don't have access to their primary-assets-folder, so I will reserve judgement.
#138
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 02:58
I don't care if they don't buy this game. My problem is that he is only looking at the negatives at something that is not even out yet and making full judgemental assumptions based of a rough script that is old as well as being confirmed to already been changed and is still being changed.Phaedon wrote...
Genshie wrote...
Your knowledge is good and all, but my point still stand you have never made a game. You can have all the knowledge in the world but unless you actually apply that knowledge then it means utter crap to anyone. In the end you have as much credit as anyone else on these boards and until we recieve actual official confirmation or until the game comes out all we can do is guess. You say your involved but have given no evidence in this.
I don't understand why you gals and guys are so upset over this.
I can see no negative to Ian, Kaisy and Saphra deciding not to buy the game, and subsequently not posting on the forums. It's their choice, isn't it?
Edit: I don't understand that he/she/it/they are even posting on these forums if they hate it so much already.
Modifié par Genshie, 08 novembre 2011 - 03:00 .
#139
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:02
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
roy.willemsen wrote...
I feel rather sorry for Ian, Kaisy, Saphra and all the other guys/girls.. who are probably crying in their beds, over a rather old script, while nothing is set in stone untill the game releases..
Enough of it is set in stone, that's for certain in. I'm not crying. I'm disappointed, but I'm relieved that my dilemma about which game to buy (this or Skyrim) has been simplified for me.
#140
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:03
ME1 and 2's general plots weren't the strongest or most original but the characters and details really made them spectacular, at least in my opinion.
The leaks has shown, to me at least, a lackluster plot which isn't a big deal. However, it also showed a lot of details, storylines, and character events which I weren't very fond of.
But we have to see the story come to life in its final form in game to see if it works or not. But right now, however premature, it is not looking good to me.
#141
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:05
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
#142
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:06
Why are you deciding between two games that have two very different release dates? It is not like both are out at the same time. And also nothing is certain at this point except for what has been confirmed, they can easily delay it if they want.Saphra Deden wrote...
roy.willemsen wrote...
I feel rather sorry for Ian, Kaisy, Saphra and all the other guys/girls.. who are probably crying in their beds, over a rather old script, while nothing is set in stone untill the game releases..
Enough of it is set in stone, that's for certain in. I'm not crying. I'm disappointed, but I'm relieved that my dilemma about which game to buy (this or Skyrim) has been simplified for me.
#143
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:07
Cool, so they hated it, and decided to judge the actual game based on simple text. You believe that they a) are looking only at the negatives,Genshie wrote...
I don't care if they don't buy this game. My problem is that he is only looking at the negatives at something that is not even out yet and making full judgemental assumptions based of a rough script that is old as well as being confirmed to already been changed and is still being changed.
Edit: I don't understand that he/she/it/they are even posting on these forums if they hate it so much already.
This seems to be a position which you strongly defend, so I am surprised that you don't also think that:
c) people who do a) and
d) them investing their money somewhere else isn't good for you, since the quality of the forums will go up.
I am all for a convo where you can persuade someone, but I don't think that you can earn much from this thread but a headache.
Modifié par Phaedon, 08 novembre 2011 - 03:10 .
#144
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:10
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Genshie wrote...
Why are you deciding between two games that have two very different release dates?
I don't have a lot of money and in addition to wanting a new game I also really need to get a new HDD. I still have the tiny 20GIG one and ME2 alone nearly fills the entire thing up.
#145
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:12
e) They are hypocrites and are still posting in an ME3 forum regardless of their obvious distaste over ME3 as of now.Phaedon wrote...
Cool, so they hated it, and decided to judge the actual game based on simple text. You believe that they a) are looking only at the negatives,Genshie wrote...
I don't care if they don't buy this game. My problem is that he is only looking at the negatives at something that is not even out yet and making full judgemental assumptions based of a rough script that is old as well as being confirmed to already been changed and is still being changed.
Edit: I don't understand that he/she/it/they are even posting on these forums if they hate it so much already.shouldn't judge the game on the leak.
This seems to be a position which you strongly defend, so I am surprised that you don't also think that:
c) people who do a) and, and will decide whether or not they will buy the game from this rather than actual reviews, deserve to be potentially mislead, and that
d) them investing their money somewhere else isn't good for you, since the quality of the forums will go up.
I can understand posting about features you dislike and having your own opinion, but what I don't understand is that if you clearly are not interested in the said product at all and have no interest in it at all why are they still here?
#146
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:14
I was going to comment on money that but I didn't want to offend. Well I have high hopes for Skyrim.Saphra Deden wrote...
Genshie wrote...
Why are you deciding between two games that have two very different release dates?
I don't have a lot of money and in addition to wanting a new game I also really need to get a new HDD. I still have the tiny 20GIG one and ME2 alone nearly fills the entire thing up.
#147
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:14
Im no lawyer. But I think gamers should sue bioware. False advertising.onelifecrisis wrote...
Adugan wrote...
Sue Microsoft
I've been wondering about that actually. I'm no lawyer but I should think that they could sue MS for, well, something.
#148
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:16
Im happy for them. They arent going to waste money and arent blinded by denial.roy.willemsen wrote...
I feel rather sorry for Ian, Kaisy, Saphra and all the other guys/girls.. who are probably crying in their beds, over a rather old script, while nothing is set in stone untill the game releases..
#149
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:16
Mm-hm, I'll go with that option.Genshie wrote...
e) They are hypocrites and are still posting in an ME3 forum regardless of their obvious distaste over ME3 as of now.
I can understand posting about features you dislike and having your own opinion, but what I don't understand is that if you clearly are not interested in the said product at all and have no interest in it at all why are they still here?
#150
Posté 08 novembre 2011 - 03:17
In the end, it is what it is. Until we get the game, we won't know for certain. I'm inclined to believe the leaked document was real and, while aspects may be different, on the whole you don't just completely deviate from an outline -- you have it for a reason. I was generally happy with what I read, and as for what caused me concern, well, I won't know for sure until I play the game or read the reviews.
People all around need to just take a breath and chill.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






