If you could, would you still be working with Cerberus?
#351
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:21
#352
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:30
Guest_Arcian_*
I'm going to use your logic here and say that Grayson breaking free would have happened regardless sooner or later, turians+A or no turians+A. That the turians and Anderson were involved was just fortunate since Cerberus would hardly have been able to contain the situation themselves.Saphra Deden wrote...
Yuoaman wrote...
Yep, the Illusive Man can't save his ass without breaking a few space stations and letting loose the Reaper's puppet.
Wait.
Yeah, that wasn't the turians' and Anderson's fault or anything.
#353
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:34
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Arcian wrote...
I'm going to use your logic here and say that Grayson breaking free would have happened regardless sooner or later, turians+A or no turians+A. That the turians and Anderson were involved was just fortunate since Cerberus would hardly have been able to contain the situation themselves.
You came to this conclusion how considering Grayson wasn't nearly the threat at that point that he would be later and TIM ordered his imminent termination?
If you are walking with a bowl of hot soup and I break into your house and run into you whose fault is it that you dropped the bowl of soup?
#354
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:36
Saphra Deden wrote...
Arcian wrote...
I'm going to use your logic here and say that Grayson breaking free would have happened regardless sooner or later, turians+A or no turians+A. That the turians and Anderson were involved was just fortunate since Cerberus would hardly have been able to contain the situation themselves.
You came to this conclusion how considering Grayson wasn't nearly the threat at that point that he would be later and TIM ordered his imminent termination?
If you are walking with a bowl of hot soup and I break into your house and run into you whose fault is it that you dropped the bowl of soup?
I suppose Project Overlord was Shepard's fault then since he had the bad manners to actually inhibit Cereberus' best weapon against the Geth. Never mind "David" would have killed everyone else and wrecked all other civilizations along with it......
Yeah, really good logic there.
-Polaris
#355
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:36
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
IanPolaris wrote...
I suppose Project Overlord was Shepard's fault then since he had the bad manners to actually inhibit Cereberus' best weapon against the Geth.
-Polaris
No, I'd blame Dr. Archer for that.
#356
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:39
Guest_Arcian_*
If the bowl of soup is a lethal stew controlled by giant, omnicidal mechasquids from lightyears away, then it's obviously my fault. If I pour stuff like that in a fragile bowl and walk around with it in the first place, I better be f***ing prepared to hold on to it to ensure it doesn't spill, regardless of what random events may cross my path.Saphra Deden wrote...
Arcian wrote...
I'm going to use your logic here and say that Grayson breaking free would have happened regardless sooner or later, turians+A or no turians+A. That the turians and Anderson were involved was just fortunate since Cerberus would hardly have been able to contain the situation themselves.
You came to this conclusion how considering Grayson wasn't nearly the threat at that point that he would be later and TIM ordered his imminent termination?
If you are walking with a bowl of hot soup and I break into your house and run into you whose fault is it that you dropped the bowl of soup?
#357
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:43
#358
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:44
Saphra Deden wrote...
IanPolaris wrote...
I suppose Project Overlord was Shepard's fault then since he had the bad manners to actually inhibit Cereberus' best weapon against the Geth.
-Polaris
No, I'd blame Dr. Archer for that.
Dr Archer was working with TIM's blessing and TIM makes it very clear that he approves of the overall idea once the safety protocols are reeximined.
The point is that every Cerberus project that doesn't directly involve Shep blows up in TIM's face. Every. Damn. One. There is no reason to think that Grayson would be any different esp given how powerful the Reapers are and how powerful they can make their selected agents (see Saren).
-Polaris
#359
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:44
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Arcian wrote...
If the bowl of soup is a lethal stew controlled by giant, omnicidal mechasquids from lightyears away, then it's obviously my fault.
How does the soup being more dangerous suddenly make it your fault for dropping it when I was the one who knocked it out of your hands? Keep in mind that if we take this further then you were also the one who cleaned up the mess (how responsible of you!).
I do not think it is fair at all to blame Cerberus when they attacked by an outside party, especially if they have taken reasonable precautions which they clearly had.
You want to blame Cerberus? Blame them for the rachni escape in ME1. You can even blame them for Overlord if you insit since somebody should have had the sense to take better precuations. However don't blame them for something that wasn't their fault. That just hurts your credibility.
#360
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:46
Because I don't want to be indoctrinated/milkshakified/any of the other unpleasant things that Cerberus seems to want.
Besides it looks like killing Cerberus pukes will be fun.
#361
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:46
-Polaris
#362
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:47
Someone With Mass wrote...
Peaceful galaxy?
Good luck having a peaceful galaxy when you've got everybody studying Reaper corpses and learning how to indoctrinate and destroy each other.
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 11 novembre 2011 - 11:48 .
#363
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:49
IanPolaris wrote...
The point is that every Cerberus project that doesn't directly involve Shep blows up in TIM's face. Every. Damn. One.
Um, no. The SR-2 didn't directly involve Shepard. Nor did the creation EDI. You may also want to consult the Shadow Broker dossiers.
#364
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:51
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
IanPolaris wrote...
Dr Archer was working with TIM's blessing and TIM makes it very clear that he approves of the overall idea once the safety protocols are reeximined.
The whole idea is sound so what is your point? The idea of Overlord isn't what caused the accident. It was Dr. Archer's overconfidence and impatience, like Rael'Zorah.
IanPolaris wrote...
The point is that every Cerberus project that doesn't directly involve Shep blows up in TIM's face.
-Polaris
No, that is not true. You want to try with a list again? AdmiralCheez did that and I countered just about every one.
The only real failures on Cerberus' part is the rachni experiments and Teltin.
Overlord was taken care of (with or without Shepard).
The derelict Reaper operation succeeded.
The experiments on Grayson were going fine and ultimately produced useful data in spite of the turians and Anderson doing everything in their power to screw it up.
The experiments on the husks and thorian creepers were wrecked by Shepard before anything could be produced (that we know of anyway).
I could go on and on.
#365
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:51
didymos1120 wrote...
IanPolaris wrote...
The point is that every Cerberus project that doesn't directly involve Shep blows up in TIM's face. Every. Damn. One.
Um, no. The SR-2 didn't directly involve Shepard. Nor did the creation EDI. You may also want to consult the Shadow Broker dossiers.
The SR-2 was built to give to Shepard so he could fight the collector. It most certainly does directly involve Shepard. Same with EDI.
-Polaris
#366
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:52
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Dave of Canada wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
Peaceful galaxy?
Good luck having a peaceful galaxy when you've got everybody studying Reaper corpses and learning how to indoctrinate and destroy each other.
I cant wait to see how Bioware explains this not happening in future games. Most likely they'll just ignore the implications of thousands of dead Reapers littering the galaxy.
#367
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:54
All the races will join hands and destroy the 'evil technology' because they don't want to sacrifice their humanity.Saphra Deden wrote...
I cant wait to see how Bioware explains this not happening in future games. Most likely they'll just ignore the implications of thousands of dead Reapers littering the galaxy.
Because Cerberus gave Shepard the SR2 and EDI their creation can not be considered a successful project?IanPolaris wrote...
The SR-2 was built to give to Shepard so he could fight the collector. It most certainly does directly involve Shepard. Same with EDI.
-Polaris
What kind of ****ed up logic is that?
Modifié par GodWood, 11 novembre 2011 - 11:56 .
#368
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:54
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
IanPolaris wrote...
The SR-2 was built to give to Shepard so he could fight the collector. It most certainly does directly involve Shepard. Same with EDI.
-Polaris
Something being done with Shepard in mind does not mean it involves Shepard. We're talking about the actual development process here.
#369
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:55
IanPolaris wrote...
didymos1120 wrote...
IanPolaris wrote...
The point is that every Cerberus project that doesn't directly involve Shep blows up in TIM's face. Every. Damn. One.
Um, no. The SR-2 didn't directly involve Shepard. Nor did the creation EDI. You may also want to consult the Shadow Broker dossiers.
The SR-2 was built to give to Shepard so he could fight the collector. It most certainly does directly involve Shepard. Same with EDI.
-Polaris
Neither of those was completed because of Shepard's involvement, and thus, no: Shepard was not "directly involved". Shepard was, at best, indirectly involved (mostly because Shepard was kind of, you know, dead at the time).
#370
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:56
Saphra Deden wrote...
IanPolaris wrote...
Dr Archer was working with TIM's blessing and TIM makes it very clear that he approves of the overall idea once the safety protocols are reeximined.
The whole idea is sound so what is your point? The idea of Overlord isn't what caused the accident. It was Dr. Archer's overconfidence and impatience, like Rael'Zorah.
The whole idea was so sound that he virtually destroyed all galactic civilization. This wasn't mere impatience. There seems to be fundamental and serious problems integreating an organic mind with a VI network. An idiot should have seen the possibity of "David" let alone Dr Archer....and the Illusive Man did approve of the project.
IanPolaris wrote...
The point is that every Cerberus project that doesn't directly involve Shep blows up in TIM's face.
-Polaris
No, that is not true. You want to try with a list again? AdmiralCheez did that and I countered just about every one.
The only real failures on Cerberus' part is the rachni experiments and Teltin.
Overlord was taken care of (with or without Shepard).
Without Shepard, all galactic civilization dies.
The derelict Reaper operation succeeded.
If that's a success I'd hate to see what you'd call a failure.....
The experiments on Grayson were going fine and ultimately produced useful data in spite of the turians and Anderson doing everything in their power to screw it up.
And of course the Super-Powerful Grayson/Reaper puppet could never break or defeat Cerberus security....oh wait.....
The experiments on the husks and thorian creepers were wrecked by Shepard before anything could be produced (that we know of anyway).
The husks destroyed the entire colony that was supposed to be studying them. Not a good result. As for the Thorian, that also was an utter failure.
I could go on and on.
Do tell.....
-Polaris
#371
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:56
#372
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:57
Saphra Deden wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
Peaceful galaxy?
Good luck having a peaceful galaxy when you've got everybody studying Reaper corpses and learning how to indoctrinate and destroy each other.
I cant wait to see how Bioware explains this not happening in future games. Most likely they'll just ignore the implications of thousands of dead Reapers littering the galaxy.
That depends on how the Reapers are defeated. It's at least feasible that the way to defeat the Reapers is to somehow terminate all their integral programs (and Reapers are actually communities of AI programs). If those processes are terminated it's reasonable to think that the indoctrination process is as well.
-Polaris
#373
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 11:59
Saphra Deden wrote...
The experiments on Grayson were going fine and ultimately produced useful data in spite of the turians and Anderson doing everything in their power to screw it up.
This is kind of a mischaracterization. They weren't even aware of what was going on with Grayson until they saw him, so it's not like screwing up that project in particular was one of their goals.
#374
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 12:01
IanPolaris wrote...
As for the Thorian, that also was an utter failure.
As for the Thorian, that wasn't Cerberus. It was Exo-Geni (and that includes the overrun colony). Cerberus just bought a couple creepers to study: you see them on the assignment where you find Kahoku's corpse.
#375
Posté 11 novembre 2011 - 12:03
IanPolaris wrote...
There seems to be fundamental and serious problems integreating an organic mind with a VI network. An idiot should have seen the possibity of "David" let alone Dr Archer....
Except it was successful.
and the Illusive Man did approve of the project.
Except he was shutting it down due to lack of progress, forcing Gavin to react with David.
Without Shepard, all galactic civilization dies.
Without Cerberus, Shepard is dead.
If that's a success I'd hate to see what you'd call a failure.....
Something that doesn't get results.
And of course the Super-Powerful Grayson/Reaper puppet could never break or defeat Cerberus security....oh wait.....
Grayson didn't kill a single Cerberus operative.
The husks destroyed the entire colony that was supposed to be studying them. Not a good result. As for the Thorian, that also was an utter failure.
Husks weren't Cerberus, Cerberus created the husks to study.
The Thorian wasn't Cerberus.
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 11 novembre 2011 - 12:03 .





Retour en haut




