He was kidnapping children and sending them to Pragia as test subjects. Kinda have a hard time believing he didn't have at least an inkling of the nature of the experimentations. I also find it suspicious that his cleanup crew conveniently left behind vids attesting to his ignorance of the goings-on there.Dean_the_Young wrote...
When did he do or authorize that?
Certainly not Pragia.
Why Cerberus cannot be defended
#401
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 04:43
#402
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 05:18
There are tests, and then there's tests. Don't confuse scope and scale without an actual basis to.Nightwriter wrote...
He was kidnapping children and sending them to Pragia as test subjects. Kinda have a hard time believing he didn't have at least an inkling of the nature of the experimentations.Dean_the_Young wrote...
When did he do or authorize that?
Certainly not Pragia.
I suppose it was also convenient that the salvage team that was already there left it alone and intact, right?I also find it suspicious that his cleanup crew conveniently left behind vids attesting to his ignorance of the goings-on there.
It was also suspiciously convenient that Jacob's father left the VI functional just outside the ship.
It was also suspiciously convenient that Miranda's loyalty mission was linear corridors to finding Niket.
It was also suspiciously convenient that Legion has zero outside sources of information to collaborate with his claims as to the nature of the Geth.
It was also suspiciously convenient that Shepard took out the entire team right before the Collectors attacked.
Rather than focus on how 'suspiciously convenient' plot-twists come to our notice in a scripted narative, shouldn't you instead focus on the actual theme of the mission... that Jack didn't know half of what she thought she knew?
You hardly need the data recordings to realize that.
Modifié par Dean_the_Young, 19 novembre 2011 - 05:18 .
#403
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 05:26
Dean_the_Young wrote...
There are tests, and then there's tests. Don't confuse scope and scale without an actual basis to.Nightwriter wrote...
He was kidnapping children and sending them to Pragia as test subjects. Kinda have a hard time believing he didn't have at least an inkling of the nature of the experimentations.Dean_the_Young wrote...
When did he do or authorize that?
Certainly not Pragia.I suppose it was also convenient that the salvage team that was already there left it alone and intact, right?I also find it suspicious that his cleanup crew conveniently left behind vids attesting to his ignorance of the goings-on there.
It was also suspiciously convenient that Jacob's father left the VI functional just outside the ship.
It was also suspiciously convenient that Miranda's loyalty mission was linear corridors to finding Niket.
It was also suspiciously convenient that Legion has zero outside sources of information to collaborate with his claims as to the nature of the Geth.
It was also suspiciously convenient that Shepard took out the entire team right before the Collectors attacked.
Rather than focus on how 'suspiciously convenient' plot-twists come to our notice in a scripted narative, shouldn't you instead focus on the actual theme of the mission... that Jack didn't know half of what she thought she knew?
You hardly need the data recordings to realize that.
Even assuming he didn't know they were torturing children, they were still KIDNAPPING them, or buying them from batarians. At some point someone in accounting would've noticed those transactions and red flags should've popped up.
I don't need to know if I even want to bring up Retribution and the length TIM goes to screw over Grayson.
#404
Guest_wiggles_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 06:25
Guest_wiggles_*
I've always felt that the holos were there for convenient exposition. I mean, if the situation was handled even remotely realistically then there wouldn't have been a Teltin facility for Jack to return to.Nightwriter wrote...
I also find it suspicious that his cleanup crew conveniently left behind vids attesting to his ignorance of the goings-on there.
#405
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 07:32
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Someone With Mass wrote...
If you have the full beta leak script, search for the word *spoiler*"Sanctuary"*spoiler* and you'll see a pretty good reason why nobody should take their side.
Yeah, nobody likes terrible writing. None of Cerberus' actions in ME3 make any sense.
Anyway defending Cerberus has never been hard. Most people just define "success" and what is acceptable in ways that make it impossible for them to accept what Cerberus does. Different moral codes and bias.
RiouHotaru wrote...
Even assuming he didn't know they were torturing children, they were still KIDNAPPING them, or buying them from batarians.
Well I'd say Cerberus did those kids a favor buying them from batarians. Otherwise what they did was morally wrong, yes, but it was only step up from what the Alliance did when they hauled in test subjects.
Sorry, "hauled in was impolite". They were "encouraged to submit to an analysis of their biotic abilities..."
In any regard, the red flags did turn up. The logs suppor this. TIM was very suspicious. Now I'm not saying the torture of kids is something he wouldn't approve, but clearly in this case he wasn't aware of what was happening and wasn't happy. Personally, I'd wager that what turned TIM off of the project was that it was costing a lot of money and did not produce cost-effective results. Jack may have proved useful and may have advanced human biotics, but making a more Jacks from the same methods wouldn't be worth it.
Modifié par Saphra Deden, 19 novembre 2011 - 07:36 .
#406
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 07:37
#407
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 07:47
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Someone With Mass wrote...
Yeah, let's ignore the atrocities just because you don't like them/think it's "bad writing" (weakest excuse I've ever seen, by the way).
It is bad writing and you know it. The only reason you want to accept it is because it supports your shallow and biased view of the group. Nothing about Cerberus' actions in ME3 make sense. It is a very cheap ploy by Bioware to make them totally unsympathetic. I suppose it works, but to me it is just an insult to my intelligence.
#408
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 08:02
Also, stop pretending that you know how I see things and that you're somehow have a superior view.
It only makes you look pathetic when it's not going your way.
#409
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 08:17
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Someone With Mass wrote...
Yeah, because Cerberus was so sympathetic before ME3.
Clearly they were as they have many supporters.
#410
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 08:22
Saphra Deden wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
Yeah, because Cerberus was so sympathetic before ME3.
Clearly they were as they have many supporters.
It's not because they have supporters that they are sympatic ... this is 2 different things.
Modifié par Siegdrifa, 19 novembre 2011 - 08:23 .
#411
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 08:24
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Siegdrifa wrote...
It's not because they have supporters that they are sympatic ... this is 2 different things.
How so? Is there some objective definition of whether Cerberus is sympathetic or not? They were sympathetic to me in ME2 and in Retribution.
#412
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 08:32
Can't say I blame them, a similar group could be useful in our society as a power balance today - as the Occupy movements have shown, greed begets greed, and when the greedy are in power, it only gets worse (in the case of this thread, everyone but 'the new guys' having access to citadel council information and whatnot).
#413
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 08:43
Saphra Deden wrote...
Siegdrifa wrote...
It's not because they have supporters that they are sympatic ... this is 2 different things.
How so? Is there some objective definition of whether Cerberus is sympathetic or not? They were sympathetic to me in ME2 and in Retribution.
There not very sympathetic in ME3 though.
#414
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 08:51
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Fixers0 wrote...
They're not very sympathetic in ME3 though.
ME3 is a big pile of tricerotops dung.
#415
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 09:00
Saphra Deden wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
They're not very sympathetic in ME3 though.
ME3 is a big pile of tricerotops dung.
Didn't you declare you were through with the forums?
#416
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 09:04
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
didymos1120 wrote...
Didn't you declare you were through with the forums?
I just couldn't keep away from you.
A lot happened. Turned out I wasn't permabanned and my PC died. I'm on a relative's right now. I'm still debating whether or not to get ME3.
However in the meantime I'm grateful to be on the internet at all as I use my PC for just about everything and losing it has extremely inconvenient.
#417
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 09:07
#418
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 01:04
Why?RiouHotaru wrote...
Even assuming he didn't know they were torturing children, they were still KIDNAPPING them, or buying them from batarians. At some point someone in accounting would've noticed those transactions and red flags should've popped up.
Simply because Cerberus did not sanction the greatest crimes and the scope of Pragia doesn't mean they weren't willing to sanction lesser crimes, for which they can certainly be held to blame for. It wasn't the nature of the procurement that was the issue that the project was trying to hide.
The red flag that did go up (which the project was trying to cover up by falsifying the records sent to TIM) was the number of children they were going through.
Mixing revenge and business, yes. It wasn't 'for the lols' or casual cruelty: it was both in response to a specific betrayal (Grayson's own) and for a specific purpose. What suggests that was his intent with Pragia?I don't need to know if I even want to bring up Retribution and the length TIM goes to screw over Grayson.
Modifié par Dean_the_Young, 19 novembre 2011 - 01:46 .
#419
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 01:19
Jarys wrote...
The problem is, as was mentioned, that Cerberus is being called 'that white supremacist group' by everyone else. The fact of the matter is, without being too political about it at least, that 'that group' has legitimate arguments. Many people believe that it is better to rule in hell than serve in heaven - being that as long as they are in power, they are better off than if they were serving. Who needs utopia when you can have your own private paradise sort of deal. As long as greed and powermongering are a major facet of any society, there will be groups that demand more than their fair share. In regards to the legitimate arguments - humanity is essentially equal in almost all ways with the other races. The tech is all the same, the militaries are similar sizes, the base populations are close. So when certain people saw all this equality, and also saw all the 'nah, your too young/ignorant/new to do this this and this,' there was a hostile reaction.
Can't say I blame them, a similar group could be useful in our society as a power balance today - as the Occupy movements have shown, greed begets greed, and when the greedy are in power, it only gets worse (in the case of this thread, everyone but 'the new guys' having access to citadel council information and whatnot).
I would be hesitant to accept the usefulness as a group that would expose me to hazardous material to see if I develop super powers, would be willing to turn me into a zombie to study the process or perform any other number of experiments.
#420
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:00
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
We haven't been back to earth. How do we know just how democratic earth really is? I would guess it's probably a quasi-fascist world.
Earth's nations are still split up into countries, so we can presume that they are more or less similar to their current political leanings and inclinations (Cerberus daily news mentions stuff about the US senate and President etc). Also the Alliance is run by a Parliament with an appointed Prime Minister, which implies strongly that it is run like a democarcy rather than an autocracy.
#421
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:16
The nature of the Alliance parliament isn't clear. There are votes for Spacer seats, but we don't have any information on how the others are allocated. Do Earth-nations appoint a representative, like a UN-diplomat? Are 'earther' seats up for election?
#422
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 03:05
#423
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 03:45
General User wrote...
If the Alliance has a Parliament with a Prime Minister, does that mean that the Alliance also has a Monarchy, constitutional or otherwise, like Great Britain? Or (more probably) is the Alliance like Israel with a separate Presidency and Prime Minister?
The Alliance probaly wouldnt even need a President, I wouldn't be suprised if it were just a Prime Minister. In the case of Britain, it is the Prime Minister who actually holds all the power with the backing of government, the role of the Monarch is purely ceremonial (although the monarch has certain powers although they would only be used in extreme circumstances). If the same holds true for a President it doesn't sound like the Alliance would need such a figurehead
#424
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 07:07
Modifié par aang001, 19 novembre 2011 - 07:08 .
#425
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 07:19
aang001 wrote...
The OP knows NOTHING on ME's universe, how it works, why Cerberus exist, their cause, paid no attention to the books, comics or games and has no clue about life in general. Anyone or cause can be defended. You are very ignorant. I dont even want to waste the time explaining to you why Cerberus exist. Despite some people in Cerberus being racist or cruel, Cerberus isnt evil. Just like the Council and every alien race in ME can be racist and displays it. Your comprehension levels are clearly too low for me to waste pages breaking it down for you. I only came in here cause your ignorant title pissed me off...
What a lovely attack, thank you
I of course bow to your superior knowledge on everything
Modifié par sponge56, 19 novembre 2011 - 07:20 .





Retour en haut




