The final scene
#1
Posté 13 novembre 2011 - 12:40
Is shep supposed to be looking at that fleet? Is the normandy supposed to have flown outside the galaxy, and joker just took that pic with his kodiak? Or are we just seeing what shep is thinking about, and the pad is a dwawing the collectors did of thier daddy?
#2
Posté 13 novembre 2011 - 02:46
#3
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
Posté 13 novembre 2011 - 02:52
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
#4
Posté 13 novembre 2011 - 06:03
#5
Posté 13 novembre 2011 - 06:17
Unrelated note: Everytime I hear Harbinger refered to as "Harby" I keep picturing this bad photoshop of a reaper themed Arby's by adding an H before the A. Probably a bad catchphrase like, "Assume Direct Control of Your Hunger." .... God, what is wrong with me?
#6
Posté 13 novembre 2011 - 02:18
Rifneno wrote...
Hmm. You know, I never really gave that scene much thought, but it doesn't really make much sense does it?
No, makes perfect sense: they're on their way and they're almost here. That's really all it's saying.
Then again we don't really know how the reapers got back to the Milky Way. Maybe it'll make sense after we find out.
Yes we do: they flew here using standard FTL. It was discussed in Arrival (in fact, the delay of using said FTL was the entire rationale behind destroying the Alpha Relay), and Mac Walters reaffirmed it on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/#...371078473003008
http://twitter.com/#...469649889247232
http://twitter.com/#...824047890927616
http://twitter.com/#...846409365532672
#7
Posté 13 novembre 2011 - 02:58
didymos1120 wrote...
No, makes perfect sense: they're on their way and they're almost here. That's really all it's saying.
What's the deal with the datapad though?
Yes we do: they flew here using standard FTL. It was discussed in Arrival (in fact, the delay of using said FTL was the entire rationale behind destroying the Alpha Relay), and Mac Walters reaffirmed it on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/#...371078473003008
http://twitter.com/#...469649889247232
http://twitter.com/#...824047890927616
http://twitter.com/#...846409365532672
Standard FTL requires discharging on a planet after a long enough journey. I'm sure the reapers can go further than most ships, but even for them two years is pretty well past the point of believability. Besides which, if it were as easy as just spending a couple years flying back (and two years to an entity that's been around for tens, perhaps hundreds of millions of years is like a few minutes to us) then why did Sovereign spend a thousand years or more trying to fix the prothean's sabotage? I know, the initial surprise attack on the Citadel is a strategic advantage, but I'm quite sure they could make it to the Citadel undetected regardless. Space is huge. Far beyond our comprehension. The chances of the reapers accidentally getting spotted if they didn't want to be is lottery level odds.
#8
Posté 13 novembre 2011 - 11:38
Rifneno wrote...
Standard FTL requires discharging on a planet after a long enough journey. I'm sure the reapers can go further than most ships, but even for them two years is pretty well past the point of believability. Besides which, if it were as easy as just spending a couple years flying back (and two years to an entity that's been around for tens, perhaps hundreds of millions of years is like a few minutes to us) then why did Sovereign spend a thousand years or more trying to fix the prothean's sabotage? I know, the initial surprise attack on the Citadel is a strategic advantage, but I'm quite sure they could make it to the Citadel undetected regardless. Space is huge. Far beyond our comprehension. The chances of the reapers accidentally getting spotted if they didn't want to be is lottery level odds.
The length of the journey is immatierial, and and in game lore stating otherwise is acting inconsistant with Newton's First Law, which is clearly explained in the "Deadliest SOB in Space" speech given at the Citadel.
The Reapers only need to get up to FTL speeds, and then can switch off the engines, and coast.
#9
Posté 14 novembre 2011 - 05:05
However thats all immaterial, because not every ship has to decharge into hydrogen, only those using the common type of drivecharge. The normandy doesnt cos it has a different type, it has fuel instead, so the reapers with their far advanced tech, presumably have drives that dont require decharging too.
#10
Posté 14 novembre 2011 - 09:14
Jafroboy wrote...
However thats all immaterial, because not every ship has to decharge into hydrogen, only those using the common type of drivecharge. The normandy doesnt cos it has a different type, it has fuel instead, so the reapers with their far advanced tech, presumably have drives that dont require decharging too.
What are you talking about? Discharging the drive core has absolutely nothing to do with the type of thrusters used, or what kind of fuel is involved. The eezo core builds up electrical charge no matter what. And there aren't different kinds of "drivecharge", nor do they "decharge into hydrogen". Read the Codex:
As positive or negative electric current is passed through an FTL drive core, it acquires a static electrical charge. Drives can be operated an average of 50 hours before they reach charge saturation. This changes proportionally to the magnitude of mass reduction; a heavier or faster ship reaches saturation more quickly.
If the charge is allowed to build, the core will discharge into the hull of a ship. All ungrounded crew members are fried to a crisp, all electronic system are burned out, and metal bulkheads may be melted and fused together.
The safest way to discharge a core is to land on a planet and establish a connection to the ground, like a lightning rod. Larger vessels like dreadnoughts cannot land and must discharge into a planetary magnetic field.
As the hull discharges, sheets of lightning jump away into the field, creating beautiful auroral displays on the planet. The ship must retract its sensors and weapons while dumping charge to prevent damage, leaving it blind and helpless. Discharging at a moon with a weak magnetic field can take days. Discharging into the powerful field of a gas giant may require less than an hour. Deep space facilities such as the Citadel often have special discharge facilities for visiting ships.
The Reapers, however, don't have crews and are quite technologically advanced, so the idea that they have ways to cope with internal discharge isn't particularly far-fetched. Also, yes: the Normandy does build up drive charge, just like every other ship. They simply don't make us deal with that (although we almost had to: there's a bunch of cut dialogue from EDI about having to discharge the core).
Modifié par didymos1120, 14 novembre 2011 - 09:17 .





Retour en haut






