Machines Are Us wrote...
CptData wrote...
If it's a Creator God, you -need- a religion.
Explain why? You could believe that there was a being that created the universe and disagree with every single known religions interpretation of how that came about, could you not?
Okay, maybe I wasn't really precise here. Let me explain a difference:
A creator god like "God" did all the detail work, made stars, sun, earth, plants, animals etc etc. He spent a lot of his (unlimited) time to craft our world, right?
Now, that kind of god violates logic. If you start to explain how and why he did what he did by claiming "godly logic cannot be understand" then you're already on the path to create your own religion. Religions need some part the ordinary guy can't understand to ensure priests and clerks and whatnot always will have a "greater understanding" and therefore a "higher standing in society".
You simply run into so many complicated questions like "what did God before he did what he did" or "who created the Creator" ...
Lets pick the "other" god: the "big bang". Whatever the reason was why our universe exist, it's beyond our imagination. We could be part of a simulation (Matrix anyone), we could just exist as a thought of some being. Or there are reasons we just can't explain since science didn't get that far yet. As long as it's not clear what "made" our universe we could say "god". But this god is no "creator god" like "God". This god just pushed a button and was not seen since then. The creation was just one single event, everything else simply happened without "god's" influence.
That leads me to the idea what I said before:
You -need- a religion to explain a creator god like the christian / jew / muslim God.
You -don't need- a religion for the other kind of "creator" god.
But maybe I'm wrong.