90% of this forum answered in one post! (Patented Wall of Text Mode)
#51
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 05:42
#52
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 05:44
#53
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 05:45
-Solrek- wrote...
A bit ostentatious. You are the wrong person to do a FAQ, your pompous tone will just upset people and cause flame wars.
Wait, I'm pompous? Commence flame war!
#54
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 05:45
-Solrek- wrote...
A bit ostentatious. You are the wrong person to do a FAQ, your pompous tone will just upset people and cause flame wars.
Is your sarcasm meter broken? May need repairs....
#55
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 06:05
Sheraldan wrote...
how about my avatar picture isn't showing!!!!
Not a terribly common problem but the search feature led me to a couple posts about it. Seems that it isn't a person-to-person bases but rather a characer-to character one. My guess is ongoing problems with the upload features of the forum.
#56
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 08:07
mikey3k wrote...
Is your sarcasm meter broken? May need repairs....
Actually I was pointing out the overuse of sarcasm as coming across as pompous. Perhaps you should look up the word "sarcasm" in the dictionary. Was that sarcasm?
Here are some points of sarcasm, which can also be described as taunts, or cutting remarks.
"Seriously, we are all sick of hearing about it."
" Stop asking."
" Learn to live without."
" please go back to the MMO of the week."
"There is too much talking from your mouth, go back to paying FPS games and leave us alone."
So as you can see, my sarcasm meter is working just fine. In fact, it is your understanding of the word sarcasm that is lacking. You should have paid more attention in school. Was that sarcasm?
Now, if I were to remove my sarcastic remarks, would I come across as more genuine and less pompous? I was just pointing out that if the author of this FAQ wanted it to be genuinely usefull they should remove the insults. Otherwise this FAQ is nothing more than post meant to flame people, or toss insults.
#57
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 08:11
Why can PC people do X and consoles got ripped off?
Because PCs are far more versatile. Consoles didn't get rippd off, they are inherenty limited.
There is too much talking in the game.
There is too much talking from your mouth, go back to paying FPS games and leave us alone.
WIN and WIN
#58
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 08:15
#59
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 08:24
#60
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 08:34
-Solrek- wrote...
mikey3k wrote...
Is your sarcasm meter broken? May need repairs....
Actually I was pointing out the overuse of sarcasm as coming across as pompous. Perhaps you should look up the word "sarcasm" in the dictionary. Was that sarcasm?
Here are some points of sarcasm, which can also be described as taunts, or cutting remarks.
"Seriously, we are all sick of hearing about it."
" Stop asking."
" Learn to live without."
" please go back to the MMO of the week."
"There is too much talking from your mouth, go back to paying FPS games and leave us alone."
So as you can see, my sarcasm meter is working just fine. In fact, it is your understanding of the word sarcasm that is lacking. You should have paid more attention in school. Was that sarcasm?
Now, if I were to remove my sarcastic remarks, would I come across as more genuine and less pompous? I was just pointing out that if the author of this FAQ wanted it to be genuinely usefull they should remove the insults. Otherwise this FAQ is nothing more than post meant to flame people, or toss insults.
Solrek clearly understands sarcasm
#61
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 08:41
Love it!
#62
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 08:43
Mages are balanced. Mages are pound-for-pound tougher than anyone else. That's why they get locked in a tower with a small army of dudes whose sole raison d'etre is to whack them when they get out of line. Mages are artillery and they fix your "issues" with the game's difficulty. If an encounter is too hard and you don't want to come back later or change the difficulty level, bring a second mage. If the game's too easy, leave the mage at camp.
#63
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 08:46
#64
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 08:48
#65
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 08:51
#66
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 08:58
Mages are overpowered!!!!one!!
Singe player party-based game. Your comparisons of the classes are irrelevant, please go back to the MMO of the week.
As person who has always loved mages, it would still be nice if there were 3 fully fleshed-out classes in the game instead of one full class and two half classes.
Yeah, rogues can rip single targets apart and warriors can soak up damage, but neither class is as fully fleshed out as mages are. Especially with an extremely limited stamina pool that cannot be regenerated through potions, both basically just use auto-attack most of the time with very activated abilities thrown in beyond a Taunt every so often or a Mark of Death here and there. I hope in the next DA game these classes will be more fully developed. It would also be nice to have one or two more classes as well.
My guys aren't attacking, they just stand there!
Most likely you have them on 'Hold position' Alternately you may have selected your entire party. In both cases your companions will not do anything unless you specifically order them to.
I also think it could be caused by a bug in some cases. Somtime when I issue an Attack command with only Alistair selected and without "Hold Position," rather than running to the new target there is a significant and annoying delay before he starts moving.
Modifié par scyld, 23 novembre 2009 - 09:03 .
#67
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 09:04
#68
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 09:16
For the waffles: Add some Cheese( Cheese Might or Force Cheese or Cheese Prison for example)
For the FAQ add: DLC content not working
You nOOb did something terribly wrong. TRY IT AGAIN!!!
#69
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 09:44
SheffSteel wrote...
Solrek clearly understands sarcasm
roofles
#70
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 09:52
Oeacle wrote...
0/10. Multiplayer please.
Now that's sarcasm
#71
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 10:15
#72
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 10:15
-Solrek- wrote...
A bit ostentatious. You are the wrong person to do a FAQ, your pompous tone will just upset people and cause flame wars.
This. Suuuuuck it suck it harder.
#73
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 10:35
Also
------------------------------
There is too much talking in the game.
There is too much talking from your mouth, go back to paying FPS games and leave us alone.
------------------------------
Snicker
Modifié par LGWu, 23 novembre 2009 - 10:39 .
#74
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 10:43
#75
Posté 23 novembre 2009 - 10:49
-Solrek- wrote...
mikey3k wrote...
Is your sarcasm meter broken? May need repairs....
Actually I was pointing out the overuse of sarcasm as coming across as pompous. Perhaps you should look up the word "sarcasm" in the dictionary. Was that sarcasm?
Here are some points of sarcasm, which can also be described as taunts, or cutting remarks.
"Seriously, we are all sick of hearing about it."
" Stop asking."
" Learn to live without."
" please go back to the MMO of the week."
"There is too much talking from your mouth, go back to paying FPS games and leave us alone."
So as you can see, my sarcasm meter is working just fine. In fact, it is your understanding of the word sarcasm that is lacking. You should have paid more attention in school. Was that sarcasm?
Now, if I were to remove my sarcastic remarks, would I come across as more genuine and less pompous? I was just pointing out that if the author of this FAQ wanted it to be genuinely usefull they should remove the insults. Otherwise this FAQ is nothing more than post meant to flame people, or toss insults.
sar⋅casm (sahr-kaz-uhm)
1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
2. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms.
i⋅ro⋅ny (ahy-ruh-nee)
–noun, plural -nies.
1. the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, “How nice!” when I said I had to work all weekend.
2. Literature.
a. a technique of indicating, as through character or plot development, an
intention or attitude opposite to that which is actually or ostensibly
stated.
b. (esp.in contemporary writing) a manner of organizing a work so as to give
full expression to contradictory or complementary impulses, attitudes,
etc., esp. as a means of indicating detachment from a subject, theme,
or emotion.
3. Socratic irony
4. dramatic irony
5. an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected. 6. the incongruity of this.
7. an objectively sardonic style of speech or writing.
8. an objectively or humorously sardonic utterance, disposition, quality, etc
Your sarcasm detector IS broken; I hope this helps
Modifié par Conall Cameron, 23 novembre 2009 - 10:54 .





Retour en haut






