forgive me if i stray, go off topic, take mindless tangents or just type too much stuff. feel free to ignore me, but please don't.

re: architect
archie actually struck me as quite as a bit of an androgyn and not definitively male in any sense. coreph, on the other hand...
re: gender roles in general society (excluding TE and the Qun)
i get the general impression that most nations and institutions in Thedas
used to have a lot of gender discrimination, but are transitioning away from that. some countries seem to struggle more with that. if you take the Human Female Noble Origin from DAO, for instance, you can get a lot of dialogue about the differences between the way that Orlais, Antiva, and Ferelden view women/femininity.
it seems like the countries who had to oppose Orlais the most are the most egalitarian (Ferelden, Free Marches). perhaps because female warriors became a necessity, but maybe also because it seemed to tick the Orlesians off a bit. Orlais and Antiva seem to still prefer that women stick to the traditionally female, even if they don't have any rules enforcing that. but there's also some residual sexism left over in other nations (the lines "I didn't think they made women Grey Wardens?" or "Mind your tongue woman!" come to mind) it's like a weird philosophical overlay of a quasi-midevil world with postmodern feminism, but blended VERY well. i think that it's a wonderful effort on bioware's part to make the game feel real to us.
i also get the overall impression, if you play from Origins to Awakenings to DA2 that the Templars have only recently opened up to women. in the DAA party banter, Anders will actually state that they only recently started making female Templars. (this would also explain the HUGE chip on the shoulders of a lot of female Templars...Rylock, Meridith, etc.)
re: gender roles in TE
i get the impression that the TE isn't exactly egalitarian. women are
legally allowed to do a lot, but since when do the Magisters actually pay much attention to the rules? if you dig deep enough into codexes, you find out that things that are routinely practiced up there are
technically against the law. and we
know they put the spin on the Chant. plus, their Chantry and Circle, both of which are pretty much intertwined with the Archon and Imperial Court, are both male dominated. and every mention of the Archon and most Magisters are in the masculine. you run into Hadriana, of course, but if you talk to that slave chick once she's at the Hawke estate (sorry I can't ever remember her name) she'll actually talk about how she felt sorry for Hadriana because none of the other Magisters took her seriously, etc. doesn't say it's because she's female, but i always got the impression that had something to do with it. also, Fenris talks about her being a "social climber" and all that, i get the impression that she's
really trying hard to gain status she wouldn't normally have. Varrania i don't take seriously because i don't think for one second that Danarius actually had any intension of training her at all. plus, she just seemed generally desperate. as for the Tevintir chick in the qunari situation when you're trying to get the relic, the game pegs her as "Tevintir Enchanter" Not exactly a ranking position. And you also get the impression that the whole exchange is so shady, that high officials aren't likely involved.
and if the
current TE is unofficially and culturally sexist, even though it's not a given, how much
worse was the old TE? it's hard to say, given that you don't run into a lot of info. but i always got the impression from things like the ghosts in the sacred ashes quest and that creepy statue lady in the Ferelden Circle, that there was some kind of gender segregation, even in the practice of magic. maybe certain kinds of magic were seen as feminine and others masculine? hard to say, and mostly speculation, but i think that it's easy to infer that the most
powerful magisters in the ancient TE were likely male. and if you want to trespass the golden city, you'd better be pretty freaking powerful!
re: mages more egalitarian?
really? name a female first enchanter. seriously. in the games, the books, anywhere. and aren't
most senior or ranking enchanters in the circles we've seen male? i can only think of two exceptions. Bethany and Wynn. Ines, if you stretch things. granted, magic
seems like it should be more egalitarian. you don't need physical strength to cast a spell as much as you need willpower. you don't need to be able to tank your opponent over. so there's no bio-sex advantage. but it's just a stretch to say that people will be automatically egalitarian on that basis alone. let's not forget how much sexism has, can and will exist in scholarly institutions.
re: fall from grace
i hate to spoil the general impression that monotheism blames chicks, but i think that Lucifer, the devil, the serpant, etc. are all portrayed as masculine if not outright male. and
they're the evil responsible for the fall from grace in Abramic faiths. they don't tempt eve, nothing bad happens. (in fact, i dig eve as a fall from grace character because she only fell for questioning the satus quo and wanting more knowledge. she's a personal freaking hero of mine. but that's neither here nor there.)
and i don't think the magisters and blights are much different from Lucifer's fall and all of that. it's still the same story of an evil and at least somewhat masculine force rebelling against the kind father creator, etc. not that different a phenom when you get down to it. just dudes fighting and dragging chicks into it like they're not that important in the overall spiritual power play.
re: andraste
andraste's story sounds more like Joan of Arc combined with the Holy Virgin Mary. (married to the maker, refuses other men, goes to war because of songs and visions, gets burned at the stake, gets taken up to heaven and crowned queen of the place.) not Jesus. just sayin'
re: gender in the chantry
the fact that the Chantry is female dominated is a) freaking awesome! and

extra awesome in the fact that bioware shows that it doesn't make the Chantry a better religion in their world than a male dominated religion is in ours. way to own up!
that being said, most Chantry priests (with the exception of the notorious M. Petrice) seem to be the epitome of the victorian "female angel" archetype. nothing you don't see in male dominated faith all of the freaking time. way to make us look like wimps.
re: Flemmeth
she is indeed the fly in the ointment, isn't she? i don't buy that she was one of the magisters. the woman is scared of the darkspawn, scared of the blight, and calls it evil. the trespassing magisters
became darkspawn. they didn't fear them. and if she's an old god, why is she scared of other old gods? there's no reason to believe that they held animosity between each other from what
i've gathered.
re: archdeamon/darkspawn gender
they're always called "it" i can't think of any dialogue, cutscene, story tag or party banter in any game or expansion that calls any darkspawn "he" or "she" if you can think of an exception, pls tell me. seriously. i
do want to know.
but let's face it, they look like dudes. other than broodmothers, which are technically ghouls, darkspawn all look like dudes. kinda. hurdocks look like clowns in the second game, but dude-ish clowns.
archdeamons look like high dragons. they're always referred to as "it" but the dragon thing makes them chicks. unless you take the old god thing into account. were the old gods gendered? i don't remember them being gendered. help on this one pls?
Modifié par labargegrrrl, 20 novembre 2011 - 03:27 .