Modifié par Sohe, 19 novembre 2011 - 11:17 .
Are people complaining too much About what might/might not happen in ME3?
#1
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 11:15
#2
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 11:30
#3
Guest_D3MON-SOVER3IGN_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 11:38
Guest_D3MON-SOVER3IGN_*
#4
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 11:44
D3MON-SOVER3IGN wrote...
If people wouldnt have read it in the first place then they wouldnt be in this situation. I'll reserve full judgement until the game comes out
Well I didnt mean JUST the spoilers in general, I meann't, Are people complaining too much about what they can or cannot have?
#5
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 11:46
#6
Guest_D3MON-SOVER3IGN_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 11:57
Guest_D3MON-SOVER3IGN_*
Sohe wrote...
D3MON-SOVER3IGN wrote...
If people wouldnt have read it in the first place then they wouldnt be in this situation. I'll reserve full judgement until the game comes out
Well I didnt mean JUST the spoilers in general, I meann't, Are people complaining too much about what they can or cannot have?
Yep I agree.I think people should just go with the flow and relax.
#7
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:21
Some people feared that mass effect would incorporate some form of MP, bioware gave their traditional non answers when asked countless times about the subject until finally lo and behold revealing that yes indeed MP was incorporated.
We've also had the DA2 debacle fresh in people's minds where again people were told that there was no issues with the complaints they made only to find once released that surprise surprise there really was.
So now we have a script leak and once again some people are annoyed/upset by certain aspects contained in that script, where once again they see in some cases their worst fears regarding mass effect seemingly proved true, bioware come out with their statment that its old, its incomplete and they're actually still working on the script itself so people shouldn't be concerned.
The problem is that when you keep answering with non answers, when you've shown that your willing to almost directly lie to people (in terms of da2) then your word isn't going to be good enough for everyone to take.
Some people are willing to give bioware more of a benefit of the doubt, others who feel they've been burned by doing so in the past are less willing, which of these attitudes turns out to be the correct one will only be proved right once me3 is actually released.
But like i said for some people, bioware have less credit in the bank than they once did and its because of this they're more likely to think negatively rather than postively when they see evidence (no matter how true or complete) or their worst fears being realised.
#8
Guest_D3MON-SOVER3IGN_*
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:26
Guest_D3MON-SOVER3IGN_*
alperez wrote...
The problem with going with the flow and relaxing is that despite what some people believe so far everything that some people feared seems to be coming true.
Some people feared that mass effect would incorporate some form of MP, bioware gave their traditional non answers when asked countless times about the subject until finally lo and behold revealing that yes indeed MP was incorporated.
We've also had the DA2 debacle fresh in people's minds where again people were told that there was no issues with the complaints they made only to find once released that surprise surprise there really was.
So now we have a script leak and once again some people are annoyed/upset by certain aspects contained in that script, where once again they see in some cases their worst fears regarding mass effect seemingly proved true, bioware come out with their statment that its old, its incomplete and they're actually still working on the script itself so people shouldn't be concerned.
The problem is that when you keep answering with non answers, when you've shown that your willing to almost directly lie to people (in terms of da2) then your word isn't going to be good enough for everyone to take.
Some people are willing to give bioware more of a benefit of the doubt, others who feel they've been burned by doing so in the past are less willing, which of these attitudes turns out to be the correct one will only be proved right once me3 is actually released.
But like i said for some people, bioware have less credit in the bank than they once did and its because of this they're more likely to think negatively rather than postively when they see evidence (no matter how true or complete) or their worst fears being realised.
I love your answers
#9
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:31
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
alperez wrote...
The problem with going with the flow and relaxing is that despite what some people believe so far everything that some people feared seems to be coming true.
Some people feared that mass effect would incorporate some form of MP, bioware gave their traditional non answers when asked countless times about the subject until finally lo and behold revealing that yes indeed MP was incorporated.
We've also had the DA2 debacle fresh in people's minds where again people were told that there was no issues with the complaints they made only to find once released that surprise surprise there really was.
So now we have a script leak and once again some people are annoyed/upset by certain aspects contained in that script, where once again they see in some cases their worst fears regarding mass effect seemingly proved true, bioware come out with their statment that its old, its incomplete and they're actually still working on the script itself so people shouldn't be concerned.
The problem is that when you keep answering with non answers, when you've shown that your willing to almost directly lie to people (in terms of da2) then your word isn't going to be good enough for everyone to take.
Some people are willing to give bioware more of a benefit of the doubt, others who feel they've been burned by doing so in the past are less willing, which of these attitudes turns out to be the correct one will only be proved right once me3 is actually released.
But like i said for some people, bioware have less credit in the bank than they once did and its because of this they're more likely to think negatively rather than postively when they see evidence (no matter how true or complete) or their worst fears being realised.
Even though it's only been two posts, I'm quoting for truth.
#10
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:41
By completing negating an entire morality path?Sohe wrote...
So, what do you guys think? Not everyone can get their wish for ME3, But at least Bioware is trying!
#11
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:44
They're not. Renegades can still win.Kaiser Shepard wrote...
By completing negating an entire morality path?Sohe wrote...
So, what do you guys think? Not everyone can get their wish for ME3, But at least Bioware is trying!
#12
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:48
It's not the destination that matters...Xilizhra wrote...
They're not. Renegades can still win.Kaiser Shepard wrote...
By completing negating an entire morality path?Sohe wrote...
So, what do you guys think? Not everyone can get their wish for ME3, But at least Bioware is trying!
#13
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:50
So "the end justifies the means" and all that doesn't apply to Renegades nearly as much as the game says it does?Kaiser Shepard wrote...
It's not the destination that matters...Xilizhra wrote...
They're not. Renegades can still win.Kaiser Shepard wrote...
By completing negating an entire morality path?Sohe wrote...
So, what do you guys think? Not everyone can get their wish for ME3, But at least Bioware is trying!
#14
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:50
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
It's not the destination that matters...Xilizhra wrote...
They're not. Renegades can still win.Kaiser Shepard wrote...
By completing negating an entire morality path?Sohe wrote...
So, what do you guys think? Not everyone can get their wish for ME3, But at least Bioware is trying!
I think you picked the wrong word then, Kaiser. "Negating" implies that it's not possible to win with that path.
#15
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:53
From an in-game perspective it does, most of the time.Xilizhra wrote...
So "the end justifies the means" and all that doesn't apply to Renegades nearly as much as the game says it does?Kaiser Shepard wrote...
It's not the destination that matters...Xilizhra wrote...
They're not. Renegades can still win.Kaiser Shepard wrote...
By completing negating an entire morality path?Sohe wrote...
So, what do you guys think? Not everyone can get their wish for ME3, But at least Bioware is trying!
Looking at the game as a product, however, I want my story to be one I can enjoy. Not some bunch of non-sensical railroading.
#16
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:55
Ahh, and there's the interesting little trick with Renegade.From an in-game perspective it does, most of the time.
Looking at the game as a product, however, I want my story to be one I can enjoy. Not some bunch of non-sensical railroading.
Renegade isn't just about throwing away the ideals you don't agree with in the first place to get the job done, but all of them that are necessary, even if you do agree with them, to get the job done.
#17
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:55
#18
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 12:57
Well, yes, the trail of corpses you leave in the hopes of appealing to politically apathetic bloodthirsty Koopas and gratitude-less corporations may not be so conducive to future content.Seboist wrote...
Of course it's possible to win as "Renegade" as it's nothing more than the Paragon path with less content and joke dialogue.
#19
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 01:01
Guest_EternalAmbiguity_*
#20
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 01:13
EternalAmbiguity wrote...
Now now, this isn't a PvR thread...
agreed!
#21
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 01:14
#22
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 01:18
Modifié par Killjoy Cutter, 20 novembre 2011 - 01:20 .
#23
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 03:02
Killjoy Cutter wrote...
From what I've seen lately, every thread is evidently either a PvR thread, or a thread just waiting for a bitter all-Renegade player to make it into one...
Co-sign. When I first came to this site I thought renegade players had legitimate gripes with the game. Now I see what it really is, they are just one of the many entitled factions of fans on this site. But a particularly loud and annoying one.
First it was "Hayyyy!!! Why do paragornz get the special stuff??" and now that BW has tried specifically not to withhold gameplay from any players based on decisions, it has become "Hayyy!!! We're getting the same stuff as paragornz???"
They only have their own attitudes to blame. They are literally complaining about leaks that should actually not only validate the previous decision they made, but also show they won't be missing out on a mission for it either (particular case-in-point, the rachni spoilers in ME3). Instead it's become a whine-fest about how "our decisions don't matter!"
If they get anything less than not just total victory, but knowing that players who chose the opposite decisions suffer immenselely, then the game is terrible and paragon-biased.
Now, this could have been avoided without BW's awful morality system that punished players who (1) don't play the character extreme towards one side, putting in conflicts that were nigh resolveable without a huge score in the paragon or renegade... or (2) didn't play ME1 and don't have the hefty bonus to help them out. If not for that, the RPG system becomes less a question of morality and more of the choices made.
... But at some point, you still have to take responsibility for the actions you make too, as a player. Like, destroying Maelon's genophage data and then expecting to have the same shot at helping cure the krogan in ME3 (a decision that has the complete opposite line of thinking behind it as saving/destroying the Collector Base).
So now every thread on this site is a soap-box for them to rant and rave. Misery loves company. They are miserable, and want the fans who want to enjoy the game to be miserable too.
As they continue to post away on the message-board for the game they claim to no longer be excited for and will not play, heh
#24
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 03:08
As for the topic, Saphra obviously went way too far and got appropirately banned for it when I saw her posting in all types of threads and insulting people. Otherwise, I don't see a problem in complaining about it in the appropriate threads that are about that.
Modifié par HiroVoid, 20 novembre 2011 - 03:10 .
#25
Posté 20 novembre 2011 - 03:30
HiroVoid wrote...
If you'll don't like topics where renegades are complaining, why are you going to them? I go to threads I get frustrated about, but I don't blame anyone, but myself for going to them in the first place.
As for the topic, Saphra obviously went way too far and got appropirately banned for it when I saw her posting in all types of threads and insulting people. Otherwise, I don't see a problem in complaining about it in the appropriate threads that are about that.
Topics are meant for on-topic discussion. I open these threads to read/talk about the game, not sift through ME3 pessimist whine-fests. Unfortunately, one can't open a topic about NG+'s without obligatory complaint-posts from the likes of Kaiser Shepard.
That side takes it upon themselves to complain, complaint-specific topics aren't even needed. Because this is a thread specifically on the topoc of complaining is the only reason I'm even giving my two-cents on the matter myself.
What's up your arse HiroVoid? If you don't have a problem with complaining in a complain-thread...
Modifié par Hah Yes Reapers, 20 novembre 2011 - 03:33 .





Retour en haut






