1667 réponses à ce sujet

[AlexXIV]

AdmiralCheez wrote...

You guys are still bickering about this bullsh*t?

It seems to be one of the hot topics. Maybe THE hot topic.

[Someone With Mass]

AdmiralCheez wrote...

You guys are still bickering about this bullsh*t?

You know it. Even if I already know the outcome.

[AlexXIV]

Saphra Deden wrote...
You don't have any such confidence. Do you? How can you be so certain? Are you meta-gaming?

Why always play the metagaming card? It gets so cliche. I mean how can anyone not metagame? You know stuff, you can't unknow it. Also, Shepard may in theory know more than we. After all we only get to see scraps. I mean who knows what Shep's doing while I am not looking? Or sleeping? Also my Shep is very confident. Some could say overconfident. He is basically King Cailan just without the fail.

[AdmiralCheez]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Thanks for the worthless post.

Not as worthless as YOUR FACE.

Seriously, guys.  What is this, Groundhog Day?

[Grand Admiral Cheesecake]

Someone With Mass wrote...

AdmiralCheez wrote...

You guys are still bickering about this bullsh*t?

You know it. Even if I already know the outcome.

Spoiler alert; Cerberus is bad! MaGuffins are good!

[Grand Admiral Cheesecake]

AdmiralCheez wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

Thanks for the worthless post.

Not as worthless as YOUR FACE.

Seriously, guys.  What is this, Groundhog Day?

Maybe it is.......

*thinks of all the glorious carnage he could cause*

Yes...this idea is...most appealing.

[Ravensword]

 

[AlexXIV]

Saphra Deden wrote...

AlexXIV wrote...

Why always play the metagaming card? It gets so cliche. I mean how can anyone not metagame?

It's easy to not do. I do it any time I try to explain the reasoning behind a decision in-game based only on what the characters in the game actually know. It is not a complicated subject.

And I could claim you have a bias because you simply don't like the way Bioware handles the base decission. I mean how do I know you don't have reasons for arguing for keeping the base which don't really have anything to do with the in-game situation? I made the decission the first time I played which was as within the first week after release. I didn't know **** about ME3. Granted, I didn't think everything through, I made a morale choice. Now that I know Cerberus is going to be a reaper pet it's really the final nail in the cerberus coffin. Is it metagaming? Maybe, maybe not. You know, at this moment of choice I was Shepard. I made the morale choice and I did not doubt it was wrong. Maybe that's all that counts. I only after wards thought about it and if it maybe had been better to keep it. Sometimes I thought it would be better and sometimes not. It took some time to realize that there is no rational choice. It is an ideological choice. Ever was, ever will be. Because nothing we *know* is enough to base such a decision on.

Modifié par AlexXIV, 10 décembre 2011 - 01:02 .

[AlexXIV]

Ravensword wrote...

 

I am going to say this off-topic. This guy ruined the spider man movies for me.

Modifié par AlexXIV, 10 décembre 2011 - 01:11 .

[AlexXIV]

Saphra Deden wrote...

AlexXIV wrote...

And I could claim you have a bias because you simply don't like the way Bioware handles the base decission.

If you think I am being biased then please explain why. What positions or justifications have I presented that indicate bias?

Well obviously you advocate paragon choices to backfire. So you want this to backfire. I am not going to search the threads for quotes. You know what I mean, we had this not long ago in another thread. The points you argue for keeping the base are all fine.

Basically I see it like this. Keep the base, risk problems. Destroy the base, risk losing ressources. That's a draw. Now you claim that the loss of ressources is worse than the problems keeping/researching it could cause. And I disagree. If I claim the opposite, none of us remains with facts to back up our opinions. Again draw. What I mean is that Bioware probably wrote it as an ideological choice, not a practical one. And that it will be considered as such in ME3. Sorry if that's metagaming again and bothering you. But I am not going to go to war with the game itself just to run into a dead end and then complain about how Bioware ruined the franchise. I like it too much to set myself up for disappointment.

Modifié par AlexXIV, 10 décembre 2011 - 01:13 .

[Kaiser Shepard]

AdmiralCheez wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

Thanks for the worthless post.

Not as worthless as YOUR FACE.

Coming from someone like you, I find that statement to be amusing.

[Someone With Mass]

Saphra Deden wrote...

I ask this in every thread on this topic and never get an answer. SMW mass wussied out and ran off without answering it. Maybe you will take his place.

Nah, I just felt like doing something else for a while.

What you've done that indicates bias?

Besides all those times you've said that Paragon is morally hopeless and that he/she is merely acting on gut feeling instead of the facts like the Renegade apparently does besides essentially giving TIM the finger in the end, which could might as well indicate that they're acting on it out of spite?

Well, then there are those other times you've said that it's pretty much pointless to fight the Reapers.

What benefits one might gain from blowing up the base?

No need to clean up the eventual mess later, not giving potential WMDs to a man who's obviously just in for his own self-gain and not letting the Reapers reacquire more resources. And locking away potential threats from that place forever.

I find that to be more than enough for me.

[Omega4RelayResident]

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

AdmiralCheez wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

Thanks for the worthless post.

Not as worthless as YOUR FACE.

Coming from someone like you, I find that statement to be amusing.

Actually we already saw the good Admiral's face.... not what I would call worthless.... unless you are talking about her forum Avatar....

Besides Cheez you know that wherever there is a Lotion Soronar arguing some point or another we must all be there to tell him hes wrong



After this comment I think I should change my Avatar back to House Harkonnen

Modifié par Omega4RelayResident, 10 décembre 2011 - 01:37 .

[Quole]

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

AdmiralCheez wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

Thanks for the worthless post.

Not as worthless as YOUR FACE.

Coming from someone like you, I find that statement to be amusing.

Yeah, everyone listen to this idiot.

[Omega4RelayResident]

Saphra Deden wrote...

What mess? What WMD's? What resources would the Reapers gain? What potential threats?

A REAPER MANUFACTURING LOCATION is one hell of a resource. A REAPER is a WMD. A REAPER is a potential threat. A REAPER is a mess.

Do you honestly think Cerberus has the firepower, and the resources that would allow them to prevent the reapers taking back their CB?

Modifié par Omega4RelayResident, 10 décembre 2011 - 01:43 .

[Someone With Mass]

Saphra Deden wrote...

What mess? What WMD's? What resources would the Reapers gain? What potential threats?

The ones that comes from the same place you pulled that incredibly useful information that will obviously turn the war around from.

[Someone With Mass]

Omega4RelayResident wrote...

A REAPER MANUFACTURING LOCATION is one hell of a resource.

Let's not forget the technology that can disable entire colonies.