Klidi wrote...
But the composing process she describes—which involves forcing oneself to keep typing without worrying about the writing being terrible and without backtracking to make changes—is my idea of hell. Forcing myself to ignore writing that’s “off” is like forcing myself not to pick out slimy bits of decaying greens as I make a salad.
Refrain from going back to fix the previous sentence when I just thought of a better way to say it? Why? If I don’t change it now, I might not remember the improvement when I come back to do that second draft. And if I suddenly realize I should have taken a different direction a paragraph ago, why not backtrack?[/i]
I did not "misunderstand" the advice. And neither did Ms. Ohlson. We understand. We just disagree. Or rather - we say that this advice does not work for us. At. All.
For her - and for me, too - that advice is a hell. It's about 'don't fuss over that word now, you'll come back to it later' - but for me, similarly as to Ms Ohlson, 'later' might mean 'never', with the result of leaving the poor word in the story.
And I can't proceed with the story knowing that something is not the best I could do. Knowing that will block my mind completely, until it is solved. It takes a lot of time, yes, but it brings satisfaction.
It's not about 'who's better writer', it's about different way of thinking, different approach to the problem. For me, forcing myself to write without editing is just producing quantity, but not quality. I could not be satisfied with the result. But, again - if it works for someone else, and they're satisfied, then it's totally fine by me.
^ This.
...That is all. xD
Modifié par Merilsell, 05 décembre 2011 - 09:07 .





Retour en haut




