Saphra Deden wrote...
You don't think EDI and the IFF were crucial to victory?
It isn't Cerberus' competence that you should be questioning but rather your own.
Should have specified. I meant the Collector Base. EDI and the IFF slipped my mind. Also, the Thanix canon and the Conduit were also kind of important. Competence minus 3.
But EDI, the canon, and the Conduit were all reverse-engineered from disabled/inactive/fragmented/benevolent Reaper tech. If it's intact/active/hostile and you intend on using it directly, that sh*t backfires. Object Rho, Grayson's implants, the Citadel, the derelict Reaper... Even the IFF backfired--it broadcasted the Normandy's location so the Collectors could f*ck your sh*t up. If EDI had not been unshackled (something Cerberus would probably not have done, see Miranda's reaction and the lines of text referencing the event in the leaked script), the ship would have been lost, and if Shepard hadn't been dicking around elsewhere, the mission would have failed right there. So while the IFF was crucial, it was also
bad.So, without Shepard and friends, the mission would have failed. TIM was right in bringing Shep back, but it was still a high risk, high reward venture, much like everything Cerberus does. Now, whether or not Cerberus is competent depends on whether or not you consider Shepard part of Cerberus, and everything (s)he does as credible to Cerberus because they brought him/her back to life. Me, I always considered Shepard a temporary ally, seperate from Cerberus, but working with them for the sake of the mission.