the principal driver for extreme para or ren choices - pour moi - is to open dialog options and get freebie intim/charm pts, and to see what the consequences are - has nothing to do with my "personality"
When I'm not doing that (fully powered playthrough) I'm playing my character - a delicious little bon-bon who takes a straight razor to bed, or a battle-scarred gyrene who dimly remembers a gratuitious kindness done him at age 5 - or any other headcanon I care to create
Finally - I think the OP is way off base - it inherently cleaner - and therefore more rhetoically powerful to argue pragmatism because it is logically consistent and self-validating. OTH, a morality-based position immediately begs the question - whose morality? - and opens itself up to internal soul-searching and debate over competing moral values. This intellectual weakness is not necessarily a weakness IRL taking into consideration the diversity of human nature as we find it, imo.
it is as if the ren/prags are a single. well disciplined army facing a loose coalition given to squabbling among themselves - the analogy may not be wholly apt but I like it. The OP position is just too facile and, in the end just his personal opinion. I've just stated mine.
Modifié par someone else, 06 décembre 2011 - 01:15 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




